Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Do Personality Traits Predict Training Performance?

The Use of a Personality Questionnaire for Air Traffic Controller Selection

Published Online:May 04, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000222

Abstract

Abstract. Most test batteries for the selection of ab initio air traffic controllers (ATCOs) include a personality questionnaire. However, the literature suggests that the relationship between personality and job performance is not straightforward: Correlations are found only for a limited set of personality factors, depend on job characteristics, and are at best small to moderate in size. Moreover, the relationship between personality scores and performance can be curvilinear rather than linear. This research investigates whether a personality test used for the selection of ATCOs predicts subsequent training performance. Training performance was measured in terms of instructor ratings (N = 262) and training outcome (N = 431). The rated training performance correlated positively with general self-efficacy and team orientation, and negatively with negativity and vulnerability. For some traits (i.e., general self-efficacy and rebelliousness), curvilinear relationships were found. A comparison of trait scores between students who had successfully completed and those who had failed the training showed significant differences for 10 of the 17 measured traits, all of which were in the expected direction.

References

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Personality and Performance, 9(1–2), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Batram, D. (1995). The predictive validity of the EPI and 16PF for military flying training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1995.tb00583.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, J. S., Castaneda, M., & Pulos, S. (2009). Meta-analysis of personality assessments as predictors of military aviation training success. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508410903415872 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carter, N. T., Dalal, D. K., Boyce, A. S., O’Connell, M. S., Kung, M.-C., & Delgado, K. M. (2014). Uncovering curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and job performance: How theoretically appropriate measurement makes an empirical difference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 564–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034688 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B., & Eber, H. W. (1962). The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets–hierarchical personality-assessment using the Revised NEO Personality-Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07564-000 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Damitz, M., & Abela, M. (2019, November). The European Air Traffic Control Selection and Assessment System (FEAST). In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luftfahrtpsychologie (DGLP)Ed., Proceedings of the 6th symposium of the German Association of Aviation Psychologists (DGLP) (pp. 51–58). DGLP. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Dryden Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eissfeldt, H. (2003, November). The development and validation of a common FEAST criterion. In EurocontrolEds., Proceedings of the second EUROCONTROL Selection Seminar, Luxembourg (pp. 27–43). EUROCONTROL. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • EUROCONTROL. (2000). Integrated task and job analysis of air traffic controllers – Phase 3: Baseline reference of air traffic controller tasks and cognitive processes in the ECAC area (HUM.ET1.ST01.1000-REP-05). EUROCONTROL. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eyferth, K., Niessen, C., & Spaeth, O. (2003). A model of air traffic controllers’ conflict detection and conflict resolution. Aerospace Science and Technology, 7(6), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1270-9638(03)00064-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Griffith, R. L., Chmielowski, T., & Yoshita, Y. (2007). Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior. Personnel Review, 36(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710731310 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Helmes, E., & Holden, R. R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: One or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00086-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hörmann, H., & Maschke, P. (1996). On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0602_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karson, S. (1969). Some relations between personality factors and job performance ratings in radar controllers. Aerospace Medicine, 40, 823–826. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karson, S., & O’Dell, J. W. (1970). Performance ratings and personality factors in radar controllers (DOT/FAA/AM-70/14). FAA Office of Aviation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1037/e413132004–001 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Le, H., Oh, I.-S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luuk, K., Luuk, A., & Aluoja, A. (2009). Predicting professional success of air traffic control personnel from their personality profile at admission to ab-initio training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508410903415872 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., Dilchert, S., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00099.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pecena, Y., Keye, D., Conzelmann, K., Grasshoff, D., Maschke, P., Heintz, A., & Eißfeldt, H. (2013). Predictive validity of a selection procedure for air traffic controller trainees. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 3(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000039 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Rathje, H., Golany, Z., & Eissfeldt, H. (2004). Pan-European selection test battery for air traffic control applicants. In K. M. GoetersEd., Aviation psychology: Practice and research (pp. 169–199). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315261843 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I.-S., & Le, H. (2006). Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: Testing a new meta-analytic procedure. Personnel Psychology, 59(2), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00065.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schroeder, D. J., Broach, D., & Young, W. C. (1993). Contributions of personality measures to predicting success of trainees in the air traffic control specialist non-radar screen program. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/21349 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Seamster, T. L., Redding, R. E., Cannon, J. R., Ryder, J. M., & Purcell, J. A. (1993). Cognitive task analysis of expertise in air traffic control. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(4), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0304_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Siem, F. M. (1992). Predictive validity of an automated personality inventory for air force pilot selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0204_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spearman, C. (1961). “General Intelligence” Objectively determined and measured. In J. J. JenkinsD. G. PatersonEds., Studies in individual differences: The search for intelligence (pp. 59–73). Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11491-006 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 703–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Tests and measurement techniques. John Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., & Hunter, A. E. (2007). Personality and training proficiency: Issues of bandwidth-fidelity and curvilinearity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X102114 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Bensch, D., Maass, U., Schult, V., Vogel, M., & Bühner, M. (2014). Big Five facets as predictor of job training performance: The role of specific job demands. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar