Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Articles

Assessing Coping With Interpersonal Stress: Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Stress Coping Scale in Japan

Published Online:January 05, 2021https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000002

Abstract

Three studies involving approximately 4,100 Japanese were conducted to estimate the validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Stress Coping Scale (ISCS) in Japan, an instrument designed to measure strategies used to cope with interpersonal stressors. Factor analyses revealed that the ISCS has a stable three-factor structure: distancing, reassessing, and constructive coping. Distancing coping includes strategies that attempt to actively damage, disrupt, and dissolve a stressful relationship. Reassessing coping refers to efforts to patiently wait for an appropriate opportunity to act, such as a change or improvement in the situation. Constructive coping involved efforts that actively seek to improve, maintain, and/or sustain a relationship without aggravating the other individuals involved. The test–retest reliability coefficients of these three factors over a 6-week period were .81, .72, and .76, respectively. Estimates of validity suggested that the ISCS is related to other scales that measure other coping strategies, personality traits, psychological functioning, and relationship satisfaction. Moreover, the ISCS scores were associated with reduced future depression, even after controlling the effects of typical coping strategies and styles of conflict management. Overall, our data indicate that the ISCS scores are a reliable and valid measure.

References

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., Waller, N. G., & Butcher, J. N. (1991). Assessment of coping: An empirical illustration of the problem of inapplicable items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 162–176. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_18 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808–818. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.890 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheng, C., Wang, F., & Golden, D. L. (2011). Unpacking cultural differences in interpersonal flexibility: Role of culture-related personality and situational factors. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 425–444. doi: 10.1177/0022022110362755 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chun, C., Moos, R. H., & Cronkite, R. C. (2006). Culture: A fundamental context for the stress and coping paradigm. In P. T. P. WongL. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 29–53). New York: Springer Science+Business. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cota, A. A., Longman, R. S., Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Xinaris, S. (1993). Interpolating 95th percentile eigenvalues from random data: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 585–596. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coyne, J. C., & Smith, D. A. F. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives' distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 404–412. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.404 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Dreu, C. K. W., van Dierendonck, D., & Dijkstra, M. T. M. (2004). Conflict at work and individual well-being. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 6–26. doi: 10.1108/eb022905 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Desivilya, H. S., & Yagil, D. (2005). The role of emotions in conflict management: The case of work teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 55–69. doi: 10.1108/eb022923 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Floyd, F., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700021644 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hashimoto, T., Mojaverian, T., & Kim, H. (2012). Culture, interpersonal stress, and psychological distress. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 527–532. doi: 10.1177/0022022112438396 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heppner, P. P. (2008). Expanding the conceptualization and measurement of applied problem solving and coping: From stages to dimensions to the almost forgotten cultural context. American Psychologist, 63, 805–816. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.805 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hidano, T., Fukuhara, M., Iwawaki, S., Soga, S., & Spielberger, C. D. (2002). Shinban STAI manual [Manual for STAI-JYZ]. Tokyo, Japan: Jitsumu-Kyouiku. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E., Dunahoo, C. L., Ben-Porath, Y., & Monnier, J. (1994). Gender and coping: The dual-axis model of coping. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 49–82. doi: 10.1007/BF02506817 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Janssen, O., & van de Vliert, E. (1996). Concern for the other's goals: Key to (de-) escalation of conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 99–120. doi: 10.1108/eb022777 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kato, T. (2002). Kyokantekicohpingusyakudo-no sakusei-to seishintekikenko-tono kanrensei-nitsuite [The development of the empathic coping scale and an assessment of the relationship of empathic coping to psychological well-being]. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 73–82. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kato, T. (2008). Taijin-sutoresu-koupingu handoboku [Handbook of coping with interpersonal stress]. Kyoto, Japan: Nakanishiya. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kawakita, J. (1986). KJ hou: Konton wo shite katarashimeru [The KJ method: Let chaos tell]. Tokyo, Japan: Chuokohron. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63, 518–526. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kramer, B. J. (1993). Expanding the conceptualization of caregiver coping: The importance of relationship-focused coping strategies. Family Relations, 42, 383–391. doi: 10.2307/585338 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lam, A. G., & Zane, N. W. S. (2004). Ethnic differences in coping with interpersonal stressors: A test of self-construals as cultural mediators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 446–459. doi: 10.1177/0022022104266108 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Londahl, E. A., Tverskoy, A., & D'Zurilla, T. J. (2005). The relations of internalizing symptoms to conflict and interpersonal problem solving in close relationships. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 445–462. doi: 10.1007/s10608-005-4442-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mattlin, J. A., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1990). Situational determinants of coping and coping effectiveness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 103–122. doi: 10.2307/2137048 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maybery, D. J., & Graham, D. (2001). Hassles and uplifts: Including interpersonal events. Stress and Health, 17, 91–104. doi: 10.1002/smi.891 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Monnier, J., Cameron, R. P., Hobfoll, S. E., & Gribble, J. R. (2000). Direct and crossover effects of prosocial and antisocial coping behaviors. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 570–584. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.14.4.570 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Monnier, J., Stone, B. K., Hobfoll, S. E., & Johnson, R. J. (1998). How antisocial and prosocial coping influence the support process among men and women in the U.S. postal service. Sex Roles, 39, 1–20. doi: 10.1023/A:1018821631246 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nakagawa, Y., & Daibo, I. (1985). Seisinkenkochosahyotebiki: Nihonban GHQ [Manual for the Japanese version of the General Health Questionnaire]. Tokyo, Japan: Nihon Bunka Kagaku. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nakano, K. (1991). The role of coping strategies on psychological and physical well-being. Japanese Psychological Research, 33, 160–167. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O'Brien, T. B., & DeLongis, A. (1996). The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: The role of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775–813. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00944.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Okazaki, S., & Sue, S. (1995). Methodological issues in assessment research with ethnic minorities. Psychological Assessment, 7, 367–375. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.367 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Otsuka, Y., Suzuki, A., Takada, M., Tomotake, S., & Nakata, A. (2008). The Japanese version of the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced: A study of Japanese schoolteachers. Psychological Reports, 103, 395–405. doi: 10.2466/pr0.103.2.395-405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 551–603. doi: 10.1023/A:1020641400589 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roger, D., Jarvis, G., & Najarian, B. (1993). Detachment and coping: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring coping strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 619–626. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90003-L First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sanchez, J. I., Spector, P. E., & Cooper, C. L. (2006). Frequently ignored methodological issues in cross-cultural stress research. In P. T. P. WongL. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 187–201). New York: Springer Science+Business. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2006). Coping with relationship stressors: The impact of different working models of attachment and links to adaptation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 25–39. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-9015-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shima, S. (1998). CES-D scale. Tokyo, Japan: Chiba Test Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Gondo, Y., & Takayama, M. (1999). NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI manual for the Japanese version. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Shinri. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (FormY): Self-evaluation questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889–938). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tweed, R. G., & DeLongis, A. (2006). Problems and strategies when using rating scales in cross-cultural coping research. In P. T. P. WongL. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 203–221). New York: Springer Science+Business. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. doi: 10.1007/BF02293557 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wong, P. T., & Ujimoto, K. V. (1998). The elderly: Their stress, coping, and mental health. In N. W. S. Zane (Ed.), Handbook of Asian American psychology (pp. 165–209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yeh, C. J., Arora, A. K., & Wu, K. A. (2006). A new theoretical model of collectivistic coping. In P. T. P. WongL. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 55–72). New York: Springer Science+Business. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, D., & Long, B. C. (2006). A multicultural perspective on work-related stress: Development of a Collective Coping Scale. In P. T. P. WongL. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 555–576). New York: Springer Science+Business. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar