Skip to main content
Original communication

Differences in risk profile associated with varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency – results from the Bonn Vein Study 1

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001115

Summary:Background: The aim of this publication is to demonstrate similarities and differences in the association of risk factors with the prevalence of different manifestations of chronic venous disease (CVD), like varicose veins (VV), venous oedema (C3) and severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in the population-based cross-sectional Bonn Vein Study 1 (BVS). Patients and methods: In the BVS 1 between 13.11.2000 and 15.3.2002, 3.072 participants, 1350 men and 1722 women, from a simple random sample of the general population of the city of Bonn and two rural townships aged 18–79 years were included. The overall response proportion was 59%. All participants answered a standardized questionnaire including information about socio-economic data, lifestyle, physical activity, medical history, and quality of life. Venous investigations were performed clinically and by a standardized duplex examination by trained investigators. The CEAP classification in the version of 1996 was used to classify the findings. Logistic regression models were performed for the association of possible risk factors with VV, venous edema (C3) and severe CVI (C4–C6). The predictive risk (PR) describes the association of the diseases and the possible influencing factors. Results: VV, venous oedema (C3) and severe CVI (C4–C6) have common risk factors like higher age, number of pregnancies, family history of VV and overweight or obesity. Female gender is significantly associated with VV and C3 but not with severe CVI (C4–C6). High blood pressure and urban living are only associated with C3 and C4–C6 disease whereas prolonged sitting is associated with C3 and lower social class with C4–C6 exclusively. Discussion: In many epidemiological studies risk factors were associated with chronic venous disorders in general. Our data show that VV, venous edema and severe CVI may have different risk profiles. Venous edema is more often associated with arterial hypertension and sedentary lifestyle whereas lower social class seems to be a risk factor for severe CVI including venous ulcers. Conclusions: The differences in the association of risk factors to VV, venous edema and severe CVI should be considered if prevention and treatment of chronic venous diseases are planned. As examples, compression stockings could be proposed in sitting profession to prevent oedema, VV patients with risk factors like obesity might benefit from early treatment for VV and obesity. More longitudinal evaluation of risk factors is necessary to evaluate the true risk profile of CVD.

References

  • 1 Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer J, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. AEP. 2005;15:175–84. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • 2 Evans CJ, Fowkes FGR, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population. Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:149–53. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 3 Rabe E, Pannier-Fischer F, Bromen K, Schuldt K, Stang A, Poncar C, et al. Bonner Venenstudie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie – Epidemiologische Untersuchung zur Frage der Häufigkeit und Ausprägung von chronischen Venenkrankheiten in der städtischen und ländlichen Wohnbevölkerung. Phlebologie. 2003;32:1–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4 Rabe E, Guex JJ, Puskas A, Scuderi A, Fernandez Quesada F, Coordinators VCP. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the Vein Consult Program. Int Angiol. 2012;31(2):105–15. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 5 Brand FN, Dannenberg AL, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. The epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham Study. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4:96–101. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 6 Carpentier PH, Maricq HR, Biro C, Poncot-Makinen CO, Franco A. Prevalence, risk factors and clinical patterns of chronic venous disorders of lower limbs: A population-based study in France. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:650–80. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 7 Chiesa R, Marone EM, Linmoni C, Volonté M, Schaefer E, Petrini O. Demographic factors and their relationship with the presence of CVI signs in Italy. The 24-Cities Cohort Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:674–80. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 8 Chiesa R, Marone EM, Linmoni C, Volonté M, Schaefer E, Petrini O. Chronic venous insufficiency in Italy: the 24-cities cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:422–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 9 Fowkes FGR, Evans CJ, Lee AJ. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic venous insufficiency. Angiology. 2001;52:S5–S15. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 10 Hirai M, Naiki K, Nakayama R. Prevalence and risk factors of varcose veins in Japanese Women. Angiology. 1990;41:228–32. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 11 Jawien A, Grzela T, Ochwat A. Prevalence of chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in Poland: multicentre cross-sectional study in 40095 patients. Phlebology. 2003;18:110–22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12 Criqui MH, Jamosmos JM, Fronek AT, Denenberg JO, Langer RD, Bergan J, et al. Chronic venous disease in an ethnically diverse population. The San Diego Population Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:448–56. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 13 Maurins U, Hoffmann BH, Lösch C, Jöckel KH, Rabe E, Pannier F. Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population – results from the Bonn Vein Study. Germany. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:680–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 14 Eklöf B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, Carpentier PH, Gloviczki P, Kistner RL, et al. Revision of the CEAP clasification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1248–52. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 15 Eklof B, Perrin M, Delis KT, Rutherford RB, Gloviczki P, American Venous Forum, European Venous Forum, International Union of Phlebology, American College of Phlebology, International Union of Angiology. Updated terminology of chronic venous disorders: the VEIN-TERM transatlantic interdisciplinary consensus document. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(2):498–501. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 16 The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Complete report. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 17 Winkler J. Die Messung des sozialen Status mit Hilfe eines Index in den Gesundheitssurveys der DHP. In: Ahrens WBellach BMJöckel K-H, editors. Messung soziodemographischer Merkmale in der Epidemiologie (RKI Schriften, 98,1). München: MMV Medizin Verlag; 1998. p. 69–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • 18 Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Bergan J, Langer RD, Fronek A. Risk factors for chronic venous disease: The San Diego Population Study. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:331–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 19 Ruckley CV, Evans CJ, Allan PL, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Chronic venous insufficiency: clinical and duplex correlations. The Edinburgh Vein Study of venous disorders in the general population. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(3):520–5. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 20 Bromen K, Pannier-Fischer F, Stang A, Rabe E, Bock E, Jöckel KH. Lassen sich geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede bei Venenerkrankungen durch Schwangerschaften und Hormoneinahme erklären? Gesundheitswesen. 2004;66:170–4. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 21 Jukkola TM, Mäkivaara LA, Luukkaala T, Hakama M, Laurikka J. The effects of parity, oral contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy on the incidence of varicose veins. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:448–451. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 22 Bérard A, Kahn SR, Abenhaim L. Is hormone replacement therapy protective for venous ulcer of the lower limbs? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(3):245–51. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 23 Pedrinelli R, Dell’Omo G, Melillo E, Mariani M. Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2000;35:621–5. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 24 Robertson LA, Evans CJ, Lee AJ, Allan PL, Ruckley CV, Fowkes FG. Incidence and risk factors for venous reflux in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(2):208–14. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 25 Purwins S, Herberger K, Debus ES, Rustenbach SJ, Pelzer P, Rabe E, et al. Cost-of-illness of chronic leg ulcers in Germany. Int Wound J. 2010;7(2):97–102. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar