When Negative Stereotypic Expectancies Turn Into Challenge or Threat: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus
Abstract
The impact of negative stereotypic expectations on men’s verbal performance was investigated in an experimental study. The study was designed to test a theoretical perspective that relates self-regulatory processes as postulated in Regulatory Focus Theory (Higgins, 1998) to stereotypic expectancy effects on test performance as previously documented in research on stereotype threat. It is argued that negative stereotypic expectancies (e.g., “Men are bad at verbal tasks”) are more likely to result in a threat experience and poorer test performance when a prevention focus and in turn a special sensitivity to potential negative outcomes is activated whereas negative stereotypic expectancies are more likely to result in a challenge experience and better test performance when a promotion focus has been induced. The results indicate that expectancy effects on test performance are indeed moderated by the mode of self-regulation activated in the testing situation.
References
Amthauer, R. , Brocke, B. , Liepmann, D. , Beauducel, A. (1999). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000. I-S-T 2000. [Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000. I-S-T 2000]. Göttingen: HogrefeBaumeister, R. F. , Tice, D. M. (1985). Self-esteem and responses to success and failure: Subsequent performance and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality, 53, 450– 467Brendl, C. M. , Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95-160). San Diego, CA: Academic PressBrunstein, J. C. , Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). Effects of failure on subsequent performance: The importance of self-defining goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 395– 407Cadinu, M. , Maass, A. , Frigerio, S. , Impagliazzo, L. , Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effects of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 267– 285Dixon, T. M. , Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Escaping the self: The moderating effect of self-complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 363– 368Goodhart, D. E. (1986). The effects of positive and negative thinking on performance in an achievement situation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 117– 124Halpern, D. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumHiggins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). San Diego, CA: Academic PressHiggins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217– 1230Hiroto, D. S. , Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311– 327Jäger, A. O. , Althoff, K. (1983). Der WILDE-Intelligenz-Test (WIT). [The WILDE Intelligence Test (WIT)]. Göttingen: HogrefeKeller, J. , Bless, H. (in press). When positive and negative expectancies disrupt performance: Regulatory focus as a catalyst. European Journal of Social PsychologyLewis-Beck, J. A. (1978). Locus of control, task expectancies, and children’s performance following failure. Journal of Educational Research, 71, 207– 210Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003 (Programme for International Student Assessment). Paris, France: OECD Publishing
Oyserman, D. , Uskul, A. , Yoder, N. , Nesse, R. , Williams, D. (2007). Unfair treatment and self-regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 505– 512Seibt, B. , Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38– 56Shah, J. , Higgins, E. T. , Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285– 293Spencer, S. J. , Steele, C. M. , Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4– 28Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613– 629Steele, C. M. , Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797– 811Steele, C. M. , Spencer, S. J. , Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic PressSwim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21– 36Zajonc, R. B. , Brickman, P. (1969). Expectancy and feedback as independent factors in task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 148– 156Zeidner, M. , Nevo, B. (1992). Test anxiety in examinees in a college admission testing situation: Incidence, dimensionality, and cognitive correlates. In K. A. Hagtvet & B. T. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 7, pp. 288-303). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger
