Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000197

Abstract. To evaluate the effects of a boundary management intervention on boundary management, recovery experiences, and well-being variables, we conducted a quasi-experimental study using an intervention lasting two consecutive days. The sample consisted of 64 employees of a large international German company; 37 in the experimental group and 27 in the control group. Boundary management, recovery experiences, and well-being outcomes were measured before the intervention and 2 weeks after the intervention. Analyses of covariance revealed an increase in boundary creation and detachment, but, contrary to the hypothesis, a decrease in control during leisure time after the intervention. No effects were found for the well-being variables.


Abgrenzung der Lebensbereiche lernen – Effekte einer Boundary Management Intervention auf Boundary Management, Erholung und Wohlbefinden

Zusammenfassung. Fortschritte in der Kommunikationstechnologie haben es möglich gemacht, jederzeit und überall zu arbeiten. Diese Entwicklungen verwischen die Grenzen zwischen den Lebensbereichen, was das Wohlbefinden und die Erholung beeinträchtigen kann. Wie können Unternehmen und Mitarbeiter die Vorteile der erhöhten Flexibilität nutzen ohne negative Konsequenzen zu erfahren? Die vorliegende Studie evaluiert die Auswirkungen einer Boundary Management Intervention, welche die Grenzziehung zwischen den Lebensbereichen fördert. Untersucht wurden die Auswirkungen auf Boundary Management, Erholung und Wohlbefinden. Dafür wurde ein zweitägiges Training entwickelt und basierend auf einem quasiexperimentellen Design in der Praxis durchgeführt. Die finale Stichprobe umfasste 64 Mitarbeiter eines großen, international tätigen deutschen Unternehmens: 37 Mitarbeiter befanden sich in der Experimentalgruppe und 27 Mitarbeiter in der Kontrollgruppe. Die Intervention beinhaltete zwei Module zur Reflexion möglicher Konflikte zwischen den Rollen in den Lebensbereichen, der aktuellen Situation und Präferenzen zur Abgrenzung von Arbeit und Privatleben sowie zwei Module zur Erarbeitung konkreter Boundary-Management-Strategien und Ziele. Die Variablen wurden direkt vor der Intervention und zwei Wochen nach der Intervention erfasst. Kovarianzanalysen zeigten in der Experimentalgruppe im Vergleich mit der Kontrollgruppe einen Anstieg im Boundary Management und im gedanklichen Abschalten von der Arbeit nach der Intervention. Konträr zu den Hypothesen wurde ein geringeres Maß an Kontrolle während der Freizeit festgestellt. Für die Wohlbefindensindikatoren konnten keine Effekte gefunden werden. Die Ergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass es möglich ist. Boundary Management durch eine Intervention gezielt zu fördern und somit die Erholung von Mitarbeitern unterstützt werden kann.

References

  • Alford, W. K., Malouff, J. M., & Osland, K. S. (2005). Written emotional expression as a coping method in child protective services officers. International Journal of Stress Management, 12, 177 – 187. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278 – 308. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ammons, S. K. (2013). Work-family boundary strategies: Stability and alignment between preferred and enacted boundaries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 49 – 58. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472 – 491. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baldwin, T. T. (1992). Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 147 – 154. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bragard, I., Etienne, A.-M., Merckaert, I., Libert, Y., & Razavi, D. (2010). Efficacy of a communication and stress management training on medical residents’ self-efficacy, stress to communicate and burnout: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 1075 – 1081. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, P. R., & Spellenberg, U. (2014). Best-Practice: Life-Balance bei der Daimler AG. In Kh. SonntagEd., Arbeit und Privatleben harmonisieren. Life Balance Forschung und Unternehmenskultur: Das WLB-Projekt [Best-Practice: Life-Balance at the Daimler AG] (pp. 171 – 184). Kröning: Asanger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brosschot, J. F., Gerin, W., & Thayer, J. F. (2006). The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60, 113 – 124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E. (2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 365 – 375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325 – 334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daley, A. J., Copeland, R. J., Wright, N. P., & Wales, J. K. H. (2008). ‘I can actually exercise if I want to; it isn’t as hard as I thought’: A qualitative study of the experiences and views of obese adolescents participating in an exercise therapy intervention. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 810 – 819. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 12 – 23. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Desrochers, S., Hilton, J. M., & Larwood, L. (2005). Preliminary validation of the work-family integration-blurring scale. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 442 – 466. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 577 – 585. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frissen, V. A. J. (2000). ICTs in the rush hour of life. The Information Society, 16 (1), 65 – 75. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery, well-being, and performance-related outcomes: The role of workload and vacation experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 936 – 945. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Golden, L. (2001). Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them? American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1157 – 1178. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72 – 92. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hahn, V. C., Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2011). Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 202 – 216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Härmä, M. (2006). Work hours in relation to work stress, recovery and health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 502 – 514. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2009). A longitudinal examination of the work-nonwork boundary strength construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 839 – 862. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513 – 524. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337 – 421. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jain, S., Shapiro, S. L., Swanick, S., Roesch, S. C., Mills, P. J., Bell, I., & Schwartz, E. R. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 11 – 21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kossek, E. E., & Lambert, S. J. (2005). “Work-family scholarship”: Voice and context. In E. E. KossekS. J. LambertEds., Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 3 – 16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2012). Work–family boundary management styles in organizations: A cross-level model. Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 152 – 171. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347 – 367. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311 – 328. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 485 – 507. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 704 – 730. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubeck, J. E., Delp, N. D., Haslett, T. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11, 92 – 107. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, D., & Sabatino, K. (1998). Evaluating guided reflection: A US case study. International Journal of Training and Development, 2, 162 – 170. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leiter, M. P., & Durup, M. J. (1996). Work, home, and in-between: A longitudinal study of spillover. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 29 – 47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397 – 422. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. DrenthH. ThierryC. J. de WolffEds., Handbook of work and organizational psychology: Work psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 5 – 33). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montgomery, A. J., Panagopoulou, E. P., Peeters, M. C. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The meaning of work and home. Community, Work & Family, 8, 141 – 161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Myrie, J., & Daly, K. (2009). The use of boundaries by self-employed, home-based workers to manage work and family: A qualitative study in Canada. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 386 – 398. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nippert-Eng, C. (1996). Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work”. Sociological Forum, 11, 563 – 583. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noe, R. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2002). Planning for training impact: Principles of training effectiveness. In K. KraigerEd., Creating, implementing, and maintaining effective training and development: State-of-the-art lessons for practice (pp. 53 – 79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nohe, C., & Sonntag, Kh. (2014). Work-family conflict, social support, and turnover intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, 1 – 12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2009). Making goal pursuit effective: Expectancy-dependent goal setting and planned goal striving. In J. P. ForgasR. F. BaumeisterD. M. TiceEds., Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 127 – 146). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oettingen, G., Hönig, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2000). Effective self-regulation of goal attainment. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 705 – 732. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 432 – 445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osborn, R. L., Demoncada, A. C., & Feuerstein, M. (2006). Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: Meta-analyses. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 36(1), 13 – 34. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Y. A., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 457 – 467. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Y. A., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Work-home boundary management using communication and information technology. International Journal of Stress Management, 18, 133 – 152. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879 – 903. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson, K. M., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 69 – 93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richman-Hirsch, W. L. (2001). Posttraining interventions to enhance transfer: The moderating effects of work environments. Human Resources Development Quarterly, 12, 105 – 119. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., Patrick, H., Deci, E. L., & Williams, G. C. (2008). Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. The European Health Psychologist, 10, 2 – 5. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 74 – 101. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (Eds.). (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksamkeit in Schulen [Scales fort he assessment of teacher and student characteristics: Documentation of the psychometric procedures in the context of the academic support of the pilot project self efficacy in schools]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 114 – 118. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204 – 221. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S., & Ilies, R. (2011). Intra-individual processes linking work and employee well-being: Introduction into the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 521 – 525. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonntag, Kh. (2009). Kompetenztaxonomien und -modelle: Orientierungsrahmen und Referenzgröße beruflichen Lernens bei sich verändernden Umfeldbedingungen. In U. StaudingerH. HeidemeyerEds., Altern, Bildung und lebenslanges Lernen (Vol. 100, pp. 249 – 268) [Competency taxonamy and models: Guiding framework and reference value of occupational learning under changing enviromental conditions]. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sonntag, Kh. (2014a). Vereinbarkeit von Arbeit und Privatleben: Herausforderungen für den Einzelnen, die Organisation und die Arbeitspsychologie. In K. SonntagEd., Arbeit und Privatleben harmonisieren. Life Balance Forschung und Unternehmenskultur: Das WLB-Projekt [Compatibility of work and private life: Challenges for the individual, the organization and work psychology]. Kröning: Asanger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sonntag, Kh. (Ed.). (2014b). Arbeit und Privatleben harmonisieren. Life Balance Forschung und Unternehmenskultur: Das WLB-Projekt [Harmonizing work and privat life: Life Balance research and corporate culture: the WLB Projekt]. Kröning: Asanger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sonntag, Kh., & Stegmaier, R. (2007). Arbeitsorientiertes Lernen: Zur Psychologie der Integration von Lernen und Arbeit [Work-place learning: on the psychology of the integration of learning and work]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stern, R. S., Lipsedge, M. S., & Marks, I. M. (1973). Obsessive ruminations: A controlled trial of thought-stopping technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 11, 659 – 662. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomsen, D. K. (2006). The association between rumination and negative affect: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1216 – 1235. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tietze, K.-O. (2010). Wirkprozesse und personenbezogene Wirkungen von kollegialer Beratung: Theoretische Entwürfe und empirische Forschung [Mechanisms and individual centered effects of peer group supervision: theoretical designs and empirical research]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, P., Dahlgren, A., Akerstedt, T., & Waterhouse, J. (2008). The impact of free-time activities on sleep, recovery and well-being. Applied Ergonomics, 39, 653 – 662. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valcour, P. M., & Hunter, L. W. (2005). Technology, organizations, and work-life integration. In E. E. KossekS. J. LambertEds., Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 61 – 84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and perceived stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 491 – 503. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063 – 1070. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar