Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

Taboo Religion?

A Contextual Analysis of the Marginalization of German Psychology of Religion

Published Online:February 26, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.2.85

Abstract

Taking the history of the psychology of religion as a case, two theses are presented: (1) Psychology has always been determined by a multitude of contextual factors, among them seemingly trivial ones such as “market” and “fashion,” and (2) research on its history readily turns into critical reflection on contemporary psychology. Psychology of religion is discussed as a subdiscipline of psychology at large, and it is pointed out that it is both a field of application of psychology in general and a part of theoretical psychology. To explain the lack of institutionalization of this subdiscipline in Germany, a comparison is made with the neighboring country of the Netherlands (where institutionalization has been remarkable). It is claimed that work on the history of psychology is necessary for the development of psychology itself and that if it is to make an impact within psychology it should not be left to professional historians without training in psychology.

References

  • Alper, M. (2001). The “God” part of the brain: A scientific interpretation of human spirituality and God. New York: Rogue Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Azari, N.P. , Missimer, J. , Seitz, R.J. (2005). Religious experience and emotion: Evidence for distinctive cognitive neural patterns. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 263–281. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumgartner, I. (Ed.). (1990). Handbuch der Pastoralpsychologie [Handbook of pastoral psychology]. Regensburg: Pustet. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Belzen, J.A. v. (2003). Aller Generalisierungen Abhold: Die Religionspsychologie nach hundert Jahren [No generalizations. Psychology of religion after 100 years]. In H.P. Brauns (Ed.), Zentenarbetrachtungen: Historische Entwicklungen in der neueren Psychologie bis zum Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts (pp. 69–82). Frankfurt: Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Belzen, J.A. v. (2005). A way out of the crisis? From Völkerpsychologie to cultural psychology of religion. Theory and Psychology, 15, 813–839. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Belzen, J.A. v. (2007). Psychologie en het raadsel van de religie. Beschouwingen bij een eeuw godsdienstpsychologie in Nederland [Psychology and the riddle of religion. Reflections on a century of psychology of religion in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Boom. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Belzen, J.A. v. (2008). The development of early psychology of religion: A Dutch falsification of the received view. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44, 258–272. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bergin, A. , Jensen, J. (1990). Religiosity of psychotherapists: A national survey. Psychotherapy, 27, 3–7. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blattner, J. , Gareis, B. , Plewa, A. (Eds.). (1992). Handbuch der Psychologie für die Seelsorge. Band 1: Psychologische Grundlagen [Handbook of pastoral care. Vol. 1: Psychological foundations]. Düsseldorf: Patmos. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blattner, J. , Gareis, B. , Plewa, A. (Eds.). (1993). Handbuch der Psychologie für die Seelsorge. Band 2: Angewandte Psychologie [Handbook of pastoral care. Vol. 2: Applied psychology]. Düsseldorf: Patmos. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bongar, B. , Brown, L.M. , Beutler, L.E. , Breckenbridge, J.N. , Zimbardo, P.G. (Eds.). (2007). Psychology of terrorism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bromley, D.G. , Melton, J.G. (Eds.). (2002). Cults, religion, and violence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buggle, F. (1991). Warum gibt es (fast) keine deutsche empirische Religionspsychologie? (Forschungsberichte des Psychologischen Instituts der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br., Nr. 73) [Why (almost) no German psychology of religion exists]. Freiburg: Abteilung für Klinische und Entwicklungspsychologie. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bulkeley, K. (2005). Soul, psyche, brain. New directions in the study of religion and brain-mind science. New York: Palgrave. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cashwell, C.S. , Young, J.S. (Eds.). (2005). Integrating spirituality and religion into counseling. A guide to competent practice. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cremer, K.J. (1938). Enkele opmerkingen ter orienteering in “de” godsdienstpsychologie [Some remarks as introduction in “the” psychology of religion]. Vox Theologica, 10, 47–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ebbinghaus, H. , Dürr, E. (1913). Grundzüge der Psychologie (begonnen von Ebbinghaus fortgeführt von Dürr) [Principles of psychology]. Leipzig: Veith. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Farberow, N.L. (Ed.). (1963). Taboo topics. New York: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fields, R.M. (2004). Martyrdom. The psychology, theology, and politics of self-sacrifice. Westport, CT: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiselier, J.A. , van der Waal, A.E. , Spijker, J. (2006). Psychiater, patiënt en religie: Meer dan coping alleen [Psychiatrist, patient, and religion: More than just coping]. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 48, 383–386. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frame, M.W. (2003). Integrating religion and spirituality into counseling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole – Thomson Learning. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, R.B. (Ed.). (2002). Health care and spirituality: Listening, assessing, caring. Amityville, NY: Baywood. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Girgensohn, K. (1921). Der seelische Aufbau des religiösen Erlebens: Eine religionspsychologische Untersuchung auf experimenteller Grundlage [The psychic structure of religious experience: Experimental research in psychology of religion]. Leipzig: Hirzel. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Griffith, J.L. , Griffith, M.E. (2002). Encountering the sacred in psychotherapy. How to talk with people about their spiritual lives. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heimbrock, H.G. (1977). Phantasie und christlicher Glaube: Zum Dialog zwischen Theologie und Psychoanalyse [Phantasy and Christian faith. On the dialogue between theology and psychoanalysis]. München: Kaiser/Grünewald. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Henning, C. , Nestler, E. (Ed.). (2000). Religionspsychologie heute [Psychology of religion today]. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, J.W. (2008). Blood that cries out from the earth. The psychology of religious terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kerssemakers, J.H.N. (1989). Psychotherapeuten en religie: Een verkennend onderzoek naar tegenoverdracht bij religieuze problematiek [Psychotherapists and religion. An explorative study into transference with religious problems]. Nijmegen: Katholiek Studiecentrum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkpatrick, L.A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klessmann, M. (2004). Pastoralpsychologie: Ein Lehrbuch [Pastoral psychology. A textbook]. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koenig, H.G. (Ed.). (2004). Handbook of religion and mental health. San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, E.W. (1911). Ueber Religionspsychologie [On psychology of religion]. Theologische Rundschau, 14, 445–464. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, W.R. (Ed.). (1999). Integrating spirituality into treatment: Resources for practitioners. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, W.R. , Delaney, H.D. (Eds.). (2005). Judeo-Christian perspectives on psychology. Human nature, motivation, and change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moosbrugger, H. , Zwingmann, C. , Frank, D. (Eds.). (1996). Religiösität, Persönlichkeit und Verhalten: Beiträge zur Religionspsychologie [Religiosity, personality and behavior. Contributions to the psychology of religion]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Newberg, A.B. , d’Aquili, E. (2001). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of belief. New York: Ballantine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paloutzian, R.F. , Park, C.L. (Eds.). (2005). The handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Persinger, M.A. (1987). Neurophysiological bases of God beliefs. New York: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pieper, J. , van Uden, R. (1998). Riagg-therapeuten over geloof en levensbeschouwing [Psychotherapists on faith and worldview]. In J. Janssen, R. van Uden, & H. van der Ven (Eds.), Schering en inslag. Opstellen over religie in de hedendaagse cultuur [Essays on religion in contemporary culture] (pp. 52–74). Nijmegen: KSGV. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pieper, J. , van Uden, M. (2005). Religion and coping in mental health care. Amsterdam: Atlanta. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ragan, C.P. , Malony, H.N. , Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1980). Psychologists and religion: Professional factors and personal belief. Review of Religious Research, 21, 208–217. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Richards, P.S. , Bergin, A.E. (1997). A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Richards, P.S. , Bergin, A.E. (2000). Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Richards, S. , Bergin, A.E. (Eds.). (2004). Religion and psychotherapy: A casebook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rümke, H.C. (1939). Karakter en aanleg in verband met het ongeloof [Character and disposition in relation to unbelief]. Amsterdam: Ten Have. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schoof, T.M. (1968). Aggiornamento: De doorbraak van een nieuwe katholieke theologie [Aggiornamento. The breakthrough of a new Catholic theology]. Baarn: Wereldvenster. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shafranske, E.P. (Ed.). (1996). Religion and the clinical practice of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sperry, L. , Shafranske, E.P. (Eds.). (2005). Spiritually oriented psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spilka, B. , Hood, R.W. , Hunsberger, B. , Gorsuch, R. (2003). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stählin, W. (1910). Review of Starbuck, E.D. (1909) “Religionspsychologie” [Psychology of religion]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 18, 1–9. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stählin, W. (1912). Die Verwendung von Fragebogen in der Religionspsychologie [The use of questionnaires in psychology of religion]. Zeitschrift für Religionspsychologie, 5, 394–508. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Straub, J. , Kochinka, A. , Werbik, H. (Eds.). (2000). Psychologie der Praxis: Anwendungs- und Berufsfelder einer modernen Wissenschaft [Psychology of praxis: Applications of and employment within a modern science]. München: dtv. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vergote, A. (1993). What the psychology of religion is and what it is not. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 73–86. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vergote, A. (1995). Debate concerning the psychology of religion. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 119–123. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wulff, D.M. (1997). Psychology of religion. Classic and contemporary (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wundt, W. (1905/1920). Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythos und Sitte. 4.Band: Mythos und Religion [Cultural psychology. An inquiry into the developmental laws of language, myth and customs. Volume IV: Myth and religion]. Stuttgart: Kröner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wundt, W. (1911). Probleme der Völkerpsychologie [Problems of cultural psychology]. Leipzig: Wiegand. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wundt, W. (1915). Völkerpsychologie, Band 6: Mythos und Religion (dritter Teil) [Cultural psychology. Vol. 6: Myth and Religion, part III]. Leipzig: Kröner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Young-Eisendraht, P. , Muramoto, S. (Eds.). (2002). Awakening and insight: Zen Buddhism and psychotherapy. Hove: Brunner-Routledge/Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zwingmann, C. , Moosbrugger, H. (Eds.). (2004). Religiosität: Messverfahren und Studien zu Gesundheit und Lebensbewältigung. Neue Beiträge zur Religionspsychologie [Religiosity: Measurement of and research on health and coping. New contributions to the psychology of religion]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar