Walking Back to the Future
The Impact of Walking Backward and Forward on Spatial and Temporal Concepts
Abstract
Abstract. Embodied cognition frameworks suggest a direct link between sensorimotor experience and cognitive representations of concepts (Shapiro, 2011). We examined whether this holds also true for concepts that cannot be directly perceived with the sensorimotor system (i.e., temporal concepts). To test this, participants learned object-space (Exp. 1) or object-time (Exp. 2) associations. Afterwards, participants were asked to assign the objects to their location in space/time meanwhile they walked backward, forward, or stood on a treadmill. We hypothesized that walking backward should facilitate the online processing of “behind”/“past”-related stimuli, but hinder the processing of “ahead”/“future”-related stimuli, and a reversed effect for forward walking. Indeed, “ahead”- and “future”-related stimuli were processed slower during backward walking. During forward walking and standing, stimuli were processed equally fast. The results provide partial evidence for the activation of specific spatial and temporal concepts by whole-body movements and are discussed in the context of movement familiarity.
References
(2016). Situated conceptualization: Theory and application. Perceptual and emotional embodiment: Foundations of embodied cognition. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press. Retrieved from http://barsaloulab.org/Online_Articles/in_press-Barsalou-chap-compositionality.pdf
(2008).
Language and simulation in conceptual processing . In M. de VegaA. GlenbergA. GraesserEds., Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 245–283). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.(2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00142
(2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
(2016). Grounding meaning in experience: A broad perspective on embodied language. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 69, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.033
(2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
(2010). Motor Action and Emotional Memory. Cognition, 115, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002
(2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34, 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01094.x
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
(2014). Embodied cognition, abstract concepts, and the benefits of new technology for implicit body manipulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00757
(2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.009
(2015). To fly or not to fly? The automatic influence of negation on language-space associations. Cognitive Processing, 16, S203–S207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0700-2
(2013). Dimensional overlap between time and space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0431-2
(2016). Conceptual and interactive embodiment: Foundations of embodied cognition. London, UK: Routledge.
(2012). Moving along the mental time line influences the processing of future related words. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1558–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.015
(2015). What makes space-time interactions in human vision asymmetrical? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00756
(2009). How action and context priming influence categorization: A developmental study. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 717–730.
(2006). Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 28(28). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7c57g5w1
(1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464
(2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39, 1764–1801.
(2015). SoSci survey (Version 2.6.00-i), Retrieved from https//www.soscisurvey.de
(2016). The length of words reflects their conceptual complexity. Cognition, 153, 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.003
(2014). Pierced by the number-line: Integers are associated with back-to-front sagittal space. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 946–951). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7740d93z
(1995). New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19, 153–167.
(2016). Time in the eye of the beholder: Gaze position reveals spatial-temporal associations during encoding and memory retrieval of future and past. Memory & Cognition, 45, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0639-2
(2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
(2005). On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_17
(1979). Individual differences in reported visual imagery and memory performance. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 70, 51–57.
(2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
(2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21, 222–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359333
(2015). Psychology (11th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
(2014). Quantitative Methoden 2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
(2016). Walking on a mental time line: Temporal processing affects step movements along the sagittal space. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 78, 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.02.013
. (2015). RStudio. Boston, MA: RStudio. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/
(2013). Patients with left spatial neglect also neglect the “left side” of time. Psychological Science, 25, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612475222
(2011). Embodied cognition. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
(2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.
(2016). Being (un)moved by mental time travel. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.04.014
(2016). What’s on the inside counts: A grounded account of concept acquisition and development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00402
(2012). Abstract spatial concept priming dynamically influences real-world actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00361
(2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008
(2015). The continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science, 2, 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12254
(2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488.
