Abstract
The current research examines the extent to which individuals endorse “sexblind” versus “sexaware” ideologies. Analogous to colorblind and multicultural ideologies, sexblindness involves ignoring sex categorization when perceiving others, and sexawareness involves recognizing and celebrating sex differences. Results revealed that participants endorsed sexblindness more (and, thus, sexawareness less) in work than in social contexts. Further, sexblindness was correlated with an internal motivation to respond without sexism, suggesting people perceive sexblindness as a way to reduce sexism. Consistent with this view, the more participants endorsed sexblindness in social settings, the less benevolent sexism they harbored. The implications of sexaware and sexblind ideologies and the difference between these ideologies and colorblind and multicultural ideologies are discussed.
References
(2008). Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 918–932.
(2008, October 7). Old gender roles with your dinner? New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com
(2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532–544.
(1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.
(1993). What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In , Gender issues in contemporary society: Applied social psychology annual (pp. 173–196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
(2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.
(2008, 10 15). The worry factor: Why the stress of economic turmoil may affect women more than men – and how to prevent anxiety-related health problems. Newsweek. Retrieved from www.newsweek.com
(2005). Internal and external motivation to respond without sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1237–1249.
(2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 857–869.
(1996). American exceptionalism. New York: Norton.
(1995). Folk theories about sex and race differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 45–57.
(2000). Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (COBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 59–70.
(2006). Color blindness and interracial interaction: Playing the political correctness game. Psychological Science, 17, 949–953.
(2008, July 24). The myth of the math gender gap. Time Magazine. Retrieved from www.time.com
(2002). Cultural models of diversity: The psychology of difference and inclusion. In , Engaging cultural differences: The multicultural challenge in liberal democracies (pp. 365–395). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
(2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17, 129–135.
(2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 202–206.
(2003). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417–423.
(2008). The social psychology of gender. New York: Guilford.
(1993). A different mirror: A history of multicultural America. Boston: Little Brown.
(2008, September 8). As barriers disappear, some gender gaps widen. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com
(2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138.
(2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 635–654.
(1994). Ethnicity: Source of strength? Source of conflict? Albany: SUNY Press.
