Skip to main content
Original Article

Effects of Targeted Self-Coaching on Applicant Distortion of Personality Measures

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000069

The present study evaluated the impact of reading self-coaching book excerpts on success at faking a personality test. Participants (N = 207) completed an initial honest personality assessment and a subsequent assessment with faking instructions under one of the following self-coaching conditions: no coaching, chapters from a commercial book on how to fake preemployment personality scales, and personality coaching plus a chapter on avoiding lie-detection scales. Results showed that those receiving coaching materials had greater success in raising their personality scores, primarily on the traits that had been targeted in the chapters. In addition, those who read the chapter on avoiding lie-detection scales scored significantly lower on a popular impression management scale while simultaneously increasing their personality scores. Implications for the use of personality tests in personnel selection are discussed.

References

  • Barrick, M. R. , Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R. , Stewart, G. L. , Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burns, G. , Christiansen, N. D. (2011). Methods of measuring faking behavior. Human Performance, 24, 1–15. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christiansen, N. D. , Goffin, R. D. , Johnston, N. G. , Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847–860. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donovan, J. J. , Dwight, S. A. , Hurtz, G. M. (2003). An assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance, 16, 81–106. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, W. , Mount, M. , Barrick, M. , & Ones, D. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 500–509. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliott, A. G. P. (1984). Some implications of lie scale scores in real-life selection. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 9–16. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1997). International personality item pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences. Retrieved from ipip.ori.org/ipip First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hart, A. , Sheldon, G. (2007). Employment personality tests decoded. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, E. (2001). Ace the corporate Personality test (pp. 1–152). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuncel, N. R. , Tellegen, A. (2009). The measurement of the social desirability of items: A conceptual and empirical reexamination. Personnel Psychology, 62, 201–228. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, C. E. , Barrett, G. V. (2008). The coachability and fakability of personality-based selection tests used for police. Public Personnel Management, 37, 339–350. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nye, C. D. , Do, B. , Drasgow, F. , & Fine, S. (2008). Two-step testing in employee selection: Is score inflation a problem? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 112–120. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self-reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. (Unpublished manual). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pearlman, K. (2009). Unproctored internet testing: Practical, legal, and ethical concerns. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 14–19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robie, C. , Komar, S. , Brown, D. J. (2010). The effects of coaching and speeding on Big Five and impression management scale scores. Human Performance, 23, 446–467. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tett, R. P. , Anderson, M. G. , Ho, C. L. , Yang, T. S. , Huang, L. , & Hanvongse, A. (2006). Seven nested questions about faking on personality tests: An overview and interactionist model of item-level response distortion. In R. L. Griffith, M. H. Peterson, (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 43–83). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Viswesvaran, C. , Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analysis of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar