Abstract
Ad hoc global virtual teams are associated with swift trust – a unique form of trust in temporary systems. Cognitive components of swift trust render it fragile and in need of reinforcement and calibration by actions. Action components of swift trust are undertheorized as are the links to team performance. We elaborate on the normative action processes of swift trust and their relationship to performance, and then report results from a longitudinal quasi-experimental study of 68 temporary virtual teams with no face-to-face interaction. Results provide support for our theory about how the normative action processes involve setting and monitoring performance norms that are supported by early trusting beliefs and that increase late trusting beliefs and consequently team performance in virtual teams.
References
2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575–618.
(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
(1991). The development of an intragroup norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural challenges. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 20–35.
(1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558–583.
(2004). Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 115–137.
(2000). Partial least squares for information systems researchers: An overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach. Tutorial at International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
(1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In , Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In , The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346–371.
(1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.
(2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 535–549.
(1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
(2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960–974.
(1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53.
(1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, 41–64.
(2001). Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Information Systems Journal, 11, 277–304.
(2003). A study of electronic partnerships, interorganizational systems and the role of trust and control. Information Systems Journal, 13, 159–190.
(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.
(2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265–287.
(1986). The psychology of self-management in organizations. In , Psychology and work: Productivity, change and employment (pp. 85–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(1986). Leading groups in organizations. In , Designing effective work groups. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
(2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
(1997). Developing trust in virtual teams. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 412–420). Washington, DC: IEEE.
(1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 58–98.
(1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29–64.
(1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815.
(2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15, 250–267.
(2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187–213.
(2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 7–40.
(1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In , Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–240). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
(1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
(1985). Separating individual and group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339–348.
(2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent response groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18, 147–161.
(2005). Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Information Systems Research, 16, 9–27.
(2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569–600.
(1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106–128.
(2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
(1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490.
(2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 214–225.
(1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In , Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251–1262.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(1994). Global work: Bridging distance, culture and time. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1992). A configurational approach to interpersonal relations: Profiles of workplace social relations and task interdependence. Irvine Working Paper. University of California, Irvine.
(2009). An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management, 34, 479–499.
(2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27, 365–395.
(2004). Virtual teams: Team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology and People, 17, 359–379.
(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
(2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 679–692.
(2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341–371.
(1996). Fragile and resilient trust and their roles in economic exchange. Business & Society, 35, 148–175.
(2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. Retrieved from www.smartpls.de
(2009). Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 241–279.
(1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.
(1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
(2011). The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: A social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 273–309.
(2001). Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32, 38–56.
(2003). Understanding virtual team development: An interpretative study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1–38.
(2006). Are all distributed teams the same? Small Group Research, 37, 662–700.
(2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344–354.
(1985). Explicit norm structuring process: A strategy for increasing task-group effectiveness. Group & Organizations Studies, 10, 37–59.
(1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behavior. In , Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27–60). London, UK: Academic Press.
(1999). The theory of planned behavior: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.
(2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 207–226.
(2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828–846.
(2012). Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Information Systems Journal, 22, 29–52.
(2011). Individual swift trust and cooperation in emergency rescue team members. Paper presented at IET International Conference on Smart and Sustainable City, Shanghai.
(2004). Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study. Information and Organization, 14, 1–26.
(