Emergence of Differing Electronic Communication Norms Within Partially Distributed Teams
Abstract
Modern organizations often consist of teams in which some people are collocated and some are remote. These teams are in-between being entirely virtual to entirely face-to-face and are referred to as partially distributed teams. Partially distributed teams function and operate in two different media environments, varying in availability of communication channels. These media environments may encourage different communication patterns, widening a gap produced by distance. In two laboratory studies we demonstrate that different electronic communication norms (ECNs) emerge among members of the same team based on their media environments. Most of the norms regarding use of electronic communication persisted even when media environment was changed. This difference in ECNs might serve as an additional faultline, causing an additional rift within distributed teams.
References
(2002). A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership. Group Organization Management, 27, 14–49.
(2008). Testing a model of sense of virtual community. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2107–2123.
(2010). Shared identity helps partially distributed teams, but distance still matters. Proceedings of Group ’10 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York, NY: ACM Press.
(2009). Subgroup biases in partly-distributed collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Research, 2, 1–18.
(2006). Collocation blindness in partially distributed groups: is there a downside to being collocated? Proceedings of CHI 2006. New York, NY: ACM Press.
(2007). The impact of individual expectations and expectation conflicts on virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 358–388.
(1999). A study of partially distributed work groups. Small Group R esearch, 30, 453–490.
(2011). Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 2–16.
(2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346–371.
(2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263.
(2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352–364.
(1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
(2003). Gentlemen don’t speak: Communication norms and condom use in bathhouses. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 277–297.
(2004). Effects of instant messaging on the management of multiple project trajectories. In Proceedings of computer human interaction. New York, NY: ACM Press.
(2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.
(2011). Collaborative intelligence: Using teams to solve hard problems. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
(2000). Distance dependencies, and delay in global collaboration. In Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp. 319–328). New York, NY: ACM Press.
(2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615–632.
(2002). Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
(2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups (Eds.), Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189–1199.
(1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, NY: Norton.
(1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
(1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.
(1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321–341.
(2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 212–238.
(2010). Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21, 115–131.
(2001). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 139–179.
(1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926.
(1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874–884.
(2006). Extending the faultline concept to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 679–692.
(2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341–371.
(2007). The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration. Journal of Management, 33, 111–132.
(1984). Organizational communication and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 461–465.
(1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121–134.
(2001). A SIDE view of social influence. In , Social influence. Direct and indirect processes (pp. 331–350). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
(1986). Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492–1512.
(2009). R u able to meat me: The impacts of students’ overly casual email messages to instructors. Communication Education, 58, 303–326.
(2012). The communication orientation model: Explaining the diverse effects of sight, sound, and synchronicity on negotiation and group decision-making outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 25–53.
(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In , Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
(1991). Social influence. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
(2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.
(2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.
(2010). Computer mediated cross cultural communication: attributing communication errors to the person versus the situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 265–276.
(1992). Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90.
(1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501.
(2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828–846.
(2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 569–597.
(2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 13–35.
