Examining Collaborative Dialogue Among Couples
A Window Into Prospective Memory Processes
Abstract
Prospective memory is a key ability required for independent living and consistent with Einstein and McDaniel (1990), we hypothesized that social partners can serve as useful external memory aids, particularly in middle and late life when these abilities may wane. We employed the Virtual Week (Rendell & Craik, 2000) task in a novel way to investigate the contribution of social partners to the prospective memory process. We examined the collaborative interactions of 11 middle-aged (M = 52.15 years; n = 5) and older (M = 75.24 years; n = 6) married dyads. The dialogue of collaborating partners reflected important PM processes (e.g., encoding, monitoring, tutoring). Age group differences favored middle-aged adults, and preliminary evidence suggested a link between collaborative dialogue and PM performance. Further investigation can determine how social partners can be used strategically to improve prospective memory outcomes.
References
1992). Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 259–283. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.259
(1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization and compensation. In , Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Interactive minds in a life-span perspective: Prologue. In , Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition, 38, 255–264. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.255
(2008). The social side of prospective memory. In , Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 347–365). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
(1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140–149. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.140
(2004). A comparison of collaborative and individual everyday problem solving in younger and older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 58, 167–195. doi: 10.2190/0Q2P-VMNH-4FXW-6J6A
(1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In , Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409–422). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
(1995). Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gains. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1996). Adults telling and retelling stories collaboratively. In , Interactive minds: Life-span perspective on the social foundation of cognition. New York, NY: University Press.
(1998). Younger and older adults collaborating on retelling everyday stories. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 160–171. doi: 10.1207/s1532480xads0203_4
(1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 16, 717–726. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717
(2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1082–1088. doi: 10.1037/a0019184
(2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327–342. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
(1994). Communication during prose recall conversations by young and old dyads. Discourse Processes, 17, 149–165. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544863
(2008). Theory of monitoring in prospective memory: Instantiating a retrieval mode and periodic target checking. In , Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 53–76). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
(2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27–39. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27
(2000). Do elderly couples have a better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121–133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<121::AID-ACP626>3.0.CO;2-A
(2009). Older adults’ interactive behaviors during collaboration on everyday problems: Linking process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 531–542. doi: 10.1177/0165025409343754
(2008). A life-span approach to the development of complex prospective memory. In , Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 187–216). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
(1992). An analysis of contents in metamemory knowledge and processes as factors affecting prospective memory. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 377–385.
(1994). The role of other persons in prospective memory: Dependence on other persons inhibits remembering and execution of a task. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 64, 482–487.
(2002). Gender differences in older adults’ everyday cognitive collaboration. International Journal of Behavior Development [Special Section: Collaborative cognition in later adulthood], 26, 45–59. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000319
(2007). Comparing older and younger adults in an event-based prospective memory paradigm containing an output monitoring component. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 168–188. doi: 10.1080/138255891007074
(1993). Theories of developmental psychology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
(1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2008). Assessment and treatment of prospective memory disorders in clinical practice. In , Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 321–345). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum.
(1990). Metamemories of memory researchers. Memory & Cognition, 18, 321–327.
(2004). Practical memory concerns in adulthood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59, 235–253.
(1999). Practical memory concerns of older adults. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 5, 231–244.
(2000). Virtual week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology (Special Issue), 14, S43–S62. doi: 10.1002/acp.770
(2009). A review of virtual week for prospective memory assessment: Clinical implications. Brain Impairment, 10, 14–22. doi: 10.1375/brim.10.1.14
(2000). ‘Please remind me …’ The role of others in prospective remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S99–S114. doi: 10.1002/acp.773
(2010). Age differences in output-monitoring accuracy. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 240–256. doi: 10.1080/13825580903265673
(2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1089–1095. doi: 10.1037/a0019183
(2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734–746. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.734
(2010, May). Facts for features: Older Americans month: May 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
. (1986). Thought and language (Abridged from 1934; A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(