Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Prospective Memory, Personality, and Working Memory

A Formal Modeling Approach

*It is journal policy that papers coauthored by an issue’s editor are handled by a guest editor. We thank Edgar Erdfelder, who handled the current manuscript, for his efforts.

Published Online:February 28, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000055

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM) involves remembering to perform an action in the future. The current study applies a multinomial model to investigate the contribution of individual differences in personality, as well as individual differences in working memory (WM) span, to performance in an event-based PM task. The model includes a parameter P that measures the prospective component, or remembering that something is to be done. The model also includes a parameter M that measures the ability to discriminate between target and non-target events, part of the retrospective component of PM tasks. The model has been applied to investigate the effects of WM variability in just one prior study, but has not been used in previous investigations of personality and PM. WM span and the personality dimension of conscientiousness showed differences between the higher and lower groups in PM performance. Modeling results showed that individuals higher in conscientiousness had higher estimate of M relative to individuals lower on the conscientiousness dimension. Conscientiousness did not affect the P parameter. In contrast, individuals with higher WM span scores had higher estimates of P relative to individuals with lower span scores, but the two WM groups did not differ in terms of parameter M.

References

  • Arana, J. M. , Meilan, J. J. G. , Perez, E. (2008). The effect of personality variables in the prediction of the execution of different prospective memory tasks in the laboratory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 403–411. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, G. A. (2011). Analyzing response time distributions: Methodological and theoretical suggestions for prospective memory researchers. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 219, 117–124. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Conway, A. R. A. , Kane, M. J. , Bunting, M. F. , Hambrick, D. Z. , Wilhelm, O. , Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cuttler, C. , Graf, P. (2007). Personality predicts prospective memory task performance: An adult lifespan study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 215–231. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Einstein, G. O. , McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, et al. (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1082–1088. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erdfelder, E. , Auer, T.-S. , Hilbig, B. E. , Aßfalg, A. , Moshagen, M. , Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models. A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217, 108–124. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F. , Erdfelder, E. , Lang, A.-G. , Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, S. S. , Bayen, U. J. , Smith, R. E. (2011). What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 69–75. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, S. S. , Bayen, U. J. , Smith, R. E. , Boywitt, C. D. (2011). The multinomial model of prospective memory: Validity of ongoing task parameters. Experimental Psychology, 58, 247–255. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Donahue, E. M. , Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical Perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John, (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kelemen, W. L. , Weinberg, W. B. , Alford, H. S. Y. , Mulvey, E. K. , Kaeochina, K. F. (2006). Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1028–1032. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kucera, H. , Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Loft, S. , Pearcy, B. , Remington, R. W. (2011). Varying the complexity of the prospective memory decision process in an air traffic control simulation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 219, 77–84. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Margrett, J. A. , Reese-Melancon, C. , Rendell, P. G. (2011). Examining collaborative dialogue among couples: A window into prospective memory processes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 219, 100–107. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • McDaniel, M. A. , Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pearman, A. , Storandt, M. (2005). Self-discipline and self-consciousness predict subjective memory in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, 60B, 153–157. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salthouse, T. A. , Berish, D. E. , Siedlecki, K. L. (2004). Construct validity and age sensitivity of prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1133–1148. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating of the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347–361. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1089–1095. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756–777. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Bayen, U. J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach. Experimental Psychology, 52, 243–256. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Bayen, U. J. (2006). The source of age differences in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 623–635. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Bayen, U. J. , Martin, C. (2010). The cognitive processes underlying event-based prospective memory in school age children and young adults: A formal model-based study. Developmental Psychology, 46, 230–244. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Hunt, R. R. , McVay, J. C. , McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734–746. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spaniol, J. , Bayen, U. J. (2002). When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 631–651. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stahl, C. , Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267–273. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voigt, B. , Aberle, I. , Schönfeld, J. , Kliegel, M. (2011). Time-based prospective memory in schoolchildren: The role of self-initiation and strategic time monitoring. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 219, 92–99. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Uttl, B. (2008). Transparent meta-analysis of prospective memory and aging. PLoS ONE, 3, e1568. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Unsworth, N. , Heitz, R. P. , Schrock, J. C. , Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Unsworth, N. , Redick, T. S. , Heitz, R. P. , Broadway, J. M. , Randall, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17, 635–654. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar