Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Analyzing Response Time Distributions

Methodological and Theoretical Suggestions for Prospective Memory Researchers

Published Online:February 28, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000056

Abstract

The analysis of response times from prospective memory experiments has resulted in multiple theoretical propositions about the role of attention in prospective memory. Extant theories of prospective memory are in good agreement that attention is necessary for detecting intention-related cues. However, these theories were primarily formulated to describe differences in mean reaction times across experimental conditions. While this approach has been fruitful for establishing a fundamental relation between attention and prospective memory, reaction time modeling techniques can be applied to prospective memory data to better constrain theorizing. In the current work, the ex-Gaussian distribution is fit to data from a prospective memory task. The results from this analysis suggest that modeling reaction time data has the potential for clarifying our understanding of the role of attention in prospective memory.

References

  • Braver, T. S. , Gray, J. R. , & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, J. Towse, (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, G. A. , Knight, J. B. , Unsworth, N. , Marsh, R. L. (2010). Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection. Memory & Cognition, 38, 304–311. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, G. A. , Marsh, R. L. , Clark-Foos, A. , Meeks, J. T. , Cook, G. I. , & Hicks, J. L. (in press). A comparison of activity-based and event-based prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, S. D. , Heathcote, A. (2003). QMLE: Fast, robust and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 485–492. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, A.-L. , Jaudas, A. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008a). Prospective memory costs: General or specific? Poster presented at the 49th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, A.-L. , Jaudas, A. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008b). Number of cues influence the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition, 36, 149–156. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cousineau, D. , Brown, S. D. , Heathcote, A. (2004). Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 742–756. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Einstein, G. O. , McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Prospective memory and metamemory: The skilled use of basic attentional and memory processes. In A. S. Benjamin, B. Ross, (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 48, (pp. 145–173). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Einstein, G. O. , McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith et al. (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1082–1088. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Einstein, G. O. , McDaniel, M. A. , Thomas, R. , Mayfield, S. , Shank, H. , Morrisette, N. , Morrisette, N. , Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327–342. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245–256. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heathcote, A. , Brown, S. D. , Cousineau, D. (2004). QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter dependent lower bound. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 277–290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heathcote, A. , Popiel, S. J. , Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340–347. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hicks, J. L. , Marsh, R. L. , Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 430–444. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382–386. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, S. S. , Bayen, U. J. , Smith, R. E. (2011). What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 69–75. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knight, J. B. , Ethridge, L. E. , Marsh, R. L. , Clementz, B. A. (2010). Neural correlates of attentional and mnemonic processing in event-based prospective memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 69, 382–386. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kucera, H. , Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, M. D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1–15. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, M. D. , Fuss, I. , Navarro, D. (2006). A Bayesian approach to diffusion models of decision making and response time. In B. Scholkopf, J. Platt, T. Hoffman, (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 19, (pp. 809–815). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, R. L. , Hicks, J. L. , Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 68–75. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, R. L. , Hicks, J. L. , Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 652–659. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Matzke, D. , Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 798–817. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McDaniel, M. A. , Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 127–144. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, E. Galanter, (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Myung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 90–100. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. , Murdock, B. B. Jr. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190–214. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rouder, J. N. , Lu, J. , Speckman, P. L. , Sun, D. , Jiang, Y. (2005). A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 195–223. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347–361. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1089–1095. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756–777. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Bayen, U. J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach. Experimental Psychology, 52, 243–256. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R. E. , Hunt, R. R. , McVay, J. C. , McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734–746. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Usher, M. , McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • West, R. L. , Murphy, K. , Armilio, M. , Craik, F. , & Stuss, D. (2002). Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain & Cognition, 49, 402–419. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wixted, J. T. , Rohrer, D. (1993). Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1024–1039. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yap, M. J. , Balota, D. A. , Cortese, M. J. , Watson, J. M. (2006). Single versus dual process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1324–1344. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar