Skip to main content
Research Spotlight

Effects of HEXACO Traits and Experimental Provocation on Aggression

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000381

Abstract. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of HEXACO traits and levels of provocation on aggressive behavior. The sample consisted of 168 participants randomly assigned to no-, low- or high-provocation conditions. Aggression was induced by the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, in which participants competed in a reaction time task wherein they received “punishments,” depending on the condition. The participants were also able to deliver the punishments, which represented the measure of aggression. Results showed that Honesty-Humility had substantively negative effects on aggression, regardless of the condition. Surprisingly, Agreeableness was unrelated to aggression. The results highlight the role of Honesty-Humility in aggression.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 53, 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertsch, K., Böhnke, R., Kruk, M. R., Richter, S., & Naumann, E. (2011). Exogenous cortisol facilitates responses to social threat under high provocation. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta – analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Book, A., Visser, B. A., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Methot-Jones, T., Gauthier, N. Y., … D’Agata, M. T. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the dark tetrad? Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Book, A., Visser, B. A., Volk, A., Holden, R. R., & D’Agata, M. T. (2019). Ice and fire: Two paths to provoked aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Book, A. S., Volk, A. A., & Hosker, A. (2012). Adolescent bullying and personality: An adaptive approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.028 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carmody, P., & Gordon, K. (2011). Offender variables: Unique predictors of Benevolence, Avoidance, and Revenge? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1012–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.037 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2018). Validating a standardized approach to the Taylor Aggression Paradigm Social. Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775408 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dinić, B. M., Mitrović, D., & Smederevac, S. (2014). Upitnik BODH (Bes, Osvetoljubivost, Dominacija, Hostilnost): Novi upitnik za procenu agresivnosti [The AVDH questionnaire (Anger, Vengefulness, Dominance and Hostility): New questionnaire for the measurement of aggressiveness]. Primenjena Psihologija, 7, 297–324. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2014.3-1.297-324 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dinić, B. M., & Smederevac, S. (2018). When you say aggressiveness, what do you mean by that? Similarities and differences between aggressiveness/agreeableness scales from personality inventories. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 214–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.028 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dinić, B. M., & Wertag, A. (2018). Effects of Dark Triad and HEXACO traits on reactive/proactive aggression: Exploring the gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., Klein, S. A., & Henninger, F. (2016). The two faces of cooperation: On the unique role of HEXACO Agreeableness for forgiveness versus retaliation. Journal of Research in Personality, 64, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomised block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69–82. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, N. M., Dahlen, E. R., Bullock-Yowell, E., & Madson, M. B. (2018). The HEXACO model of personality and Dark Triad in relational aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2012). Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility as predictors of revenge intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 596–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Međedović, J., Čolović, P., Dinić, B. M., & Smederevac, S. (2019). The HEXACO personality inventory: Validation and psychometric properties in the Serbian language. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1370426 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mihić, Lj., Novović, Z., Čolović, P., & Smederevac, S. (2014). Serbian adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Its facets and second-order structure. Psihologija, 47, 393–414. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1404393M First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nouvion, S. O., Cherek, D. R., Lane, S. D., Tcheremissine, O. V., & Lieving, L. M. (2007). Human proactive aggression: Association with personality disorders and psychopathy. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20220 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience and Methods, 162, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seibert, L. A., Miller, J. D., Pryor, L. R., Reidy, D. E., & Zeichner, A. (2010). Personality and laboratory based aggression: Comparing the predictive power of the Five-Factor Model, BIS/BAS, and impulsivity across context. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheppard, K. E., & Boon, S. D. (2012). Predicting appraisals of romantic revenge: The roles of Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Vengefulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sokolovska, V., Dinić, B. M., & Tomašević, A. (2018). Aggressiveness in the HEXACO personality model. Psihologija, 51, 449–468. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170705022S First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, S. (1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35, 297–310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar