Mining Twitter to Detect Hotspots in Psychology
Abstract
Abstract. For identifying psychological hotspot topics, a mere focus on bibliometric data suffers from a publication delay. To overcome this issue, we introduce Twitter mining of ongoing online communication among scientists for the detection of psychological research topics. Specifically, we collected the entire 69,963 tweets posted between August 2007 and July 2020 from 139 accounts of psychology professors, departments, and research institutes from the German-speaking countries, as well as sections of the German Psychological Society (DGPs). To examine whether Twitter topics are hotspots in terms of indicating future publication trends, 346,361 references in the PSYNDEX database were extracted. For determining the additional value of our approach in contrast to traditional conference analysis, we gathered all available conference programs of the DGPs and its sections since 2010 and compared dates of topic emergence. Results revealed 21 topics addressing societal issues (e.g., COVID-19), methodology (e.g., machine learning), scientific research (e.g., replication crisis), and different areas of psychological research. Ten topics indicated an increasing publication trend, particularly topics related to methodology or scientific transparency. Seven Twitter topics emerged earlier on Twitter than at conferences. A total of four topics could be expected neither by bibliometric forecasting nor conference contents: “methodological issues in meta-analyses”, “playfulness”, “preregistration”, and “mobile brain/body imaging”. Taken together, Twitter mining is a worthwhile endeavor for identifying psychological hotspot topics, especially regarding societal issues, novel research methods, and research transparency in psychology. In order to get the most comprehensive picture of research hotspots, Twitter mining is recommended in addition to bibliometric analyses of publication trends and monitoring of conference topics.
References
2017). The emergence of a field: A network analysis of research on peer review. Scientometrics, 113(1), 503–532.
(2019).
(Development of a user-friendly app for exploring and analyzing research topics in psychology . In G. CatalanoC. DaraioM. GregoriH. F. MoedG. RuoccoEds., Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 2634–2635). Edizioni Efesto. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.25212018). How to identify hot topics in psychology using topic modeling. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000318
(2019). Ist die psychologische Forschung durchlässig für aktuelle gesellschaftliche Themen? Eine szientometrische Analyse am Beispiel Flucht und Migration mithilfe von Topic Modeling.
([Does psychological research address current social issues? A scientometric analysis of the example of refugees and migration using topic modeling] Psychologische Rundschau, 70(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a0004262013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001
(2016). How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One, 11(10), e0162680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162680
(2013). The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 6(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f
(2015). Sadness shifts to anxiety over time and distance from the national tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut. Psychological Science, 26(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614562218
(2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012
(2018, April 10). Terror management and Twitter: The case of the 2016 Berlin terrorist attack. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/964dc
(2014). Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145
(2014).
(Identifying and analyzing researchers on Twitter . In M. StrohmaierE. T. MeyerC. CattutoEds., Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science (pp. 23–32). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.26156762011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332(6025), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200970
(2017). A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175368
(2016). Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000091
(2012). Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(500), 1590–1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.737745
(2020). A completely new culture of doing research.” Coronavirus outbreak changes how scientists communicate [Blog post]. Science Magazine, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4761
(2018). Geographically resolved rhythms in Twitter use reveal social pressures on daily activity patterns. Current Biology, 28(23), 3763–3775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.016
(2017).
(Trends in topics at SE conferences (1993–2013) . In R. BilofEd., Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (pp. 397–398). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.2010).
(Twittermonitor: Trend detection over the Twitter stream . In A. ElmagarmidD. AgrawalEds., Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data (pp. 1155–1158). Association for Computing Machinery.2014). Identification of emerging scientific topics in bibliometric databases (Doctoral Dissertation), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000042107/3156624
(2017). Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 41(5), 744–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185
(2016). Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament. Electoral Studies, 44, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.014
(2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
(2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306
(2014). Social media for large studies of behavior. Science, 346(6213), 1063–1064. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.346.6213.1063
(2004). Internationalität und Internationalisierung der deutschsprachigen Psychologie aus bibliometrischer Perspektive – Methoden und Befunde zu Geschichte und aktueller Entwicklung,
([Internationality and Internationalization of psychology from the German speaking countries from a bibliometric perspective – Methods and results on history and current development] (Doctoral dissertation) . University of Trier. https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-012f-9ddc/2009). Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application. Scientometrics, 79(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0424-0
(2020, June). The ZPID lockdown measures dataset. ZPID Science Information Online. 20(1). https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3019
(Tuleya, L. G. (Ed.). (2007). Thesaurus of psychological index terms (11th ed.). American Psychological Association.
2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature News, 512(7513), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a
(2016). Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0?
([Science communication 2.0?] Publizistik, 61(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-015-0249-12018). Perspektiven der Psychologie in Deutschland
. ([Perspectives of psychology in Germany] . https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/6825-18.pdf2013).
(A biterm topic model for short texts . In D. SchwalbeV. A. Fernandes AlmeidaH. GlaserR. A. Baeza-YatesS. B. MoonEds., Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1445–1456). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.24885142019). User interest prediction over future unobserved topics on social networks. Information Retrieval Journal, 22(1–2), 93–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018-9337-y
(2015). Real‐time classification of Twitter trends. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(3), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23186
(