Skip to main content
Open AccessOriginal Article

An Analysis of the Hebrew Translation of the OLIW-S to Assess Adult Playfulness

Psychometric Properties, Factorial Validity, and Measurement Invariance With the German Version

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000058

Abstract: Adult playfulness is an individual difference variable that receives increasing interest. A multifacetted model of playfulness distinguishes between Other-directed, Lighthearted, Intellectual, and Whimsical playfulness. A 12-item brief version to assess these four facets with three items each, the OLIW-S, has been introduced in German. In this study, we investigate the psychometric properties of the Hebrew translation of the OLIW-S in an Israeli sample (N = 298). Our analyses of the item and scale parameters showed acceptable internal consistencies for short scales aimed for research purposes (αs and ωs between .53 and .80), item-total correlations, factorial validity, and metric measurement invariance with the original German language version (German sample, N = 302). Overall, our findings provide initial evidence for the psychometric qualities of the Hebrew translation of the OLIW-S, and analyses using the data from Germany replicate prior findings. We discuss future perspectives for extending the study of the reliability and validity of the Hebrew OLIW-S.

References

  • Barnett, L. A. (2017). The inculcation of adult playfulness: From west to east. International Journal of Play, 6(3), 255–271. 10.1080/21594937.2017.1383010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bittermann, A., Batzdorfer, V., Müller, S. M., & Steinmetz, H. (2021). Mining Twitter to detect hotspots in psychology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 229(1), 3–14. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000437 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Friedemann, S. F., Chick, G., & Proyer, R. T. (2023). “Play with me, darling!” Testing the associations between adult playfulness and indicators of sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(4), 522–534. 10.1080/00224499.2022.2077289 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Proyer, R. T., & Chick, G. (2021). Adult playfulness: An update on an understudied individual differences variable and its role in romantic life. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4), Article e12589. 10.1111/spc3.12589 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Proyer, R., Rubinstein, D., & Lahad, M. (2023). Hebrew translation of the OLIW-S [Open data and materials]. https://osf.io/7xq3b/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Ranger, M., & Ziegler, M. (2023). Confirmatory factor analyses in Psychological Test Adaptation and Development: A non-technical discussion of the WLSMV estimator. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 4(1), 4–12. 10.1027/2698-1866/a000034 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Sendatzki, R., & Proyer, R. T. (2023a). Exploring the acquaintanceship effect for the accuracy of judgments of traits and profiles of adult playfulness. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. 10.1111/jopy.12839 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Sendatzki, R., & Proyer, R. T. (2023b). Replicating and extending findings on the interpersonal perception of adult playfulness at zero-acquaintance: A study of self-other agreement, consensus, and two accuracy criteria [Manuscript in preparation]. Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Sendatzki, R., Scherrer, T., Chick, G., & Proyer, R. T. (2021). Revisiting adult playfulness and relationship satisfaction: APIM analyses of middle-aged and older couples. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s41042-021-00058-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. 10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chick, G. (2001). What is play for? Sexual selection and the evolution of play. Play and Culture Studies, 3, 3–25. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clifford, C., Paulk, E., Lin, Q., Cadwallader, J., Lubbers, K., & Frazier, L. D. (2022). Relationships among adult playfulness, stress, and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s12144-022-02870-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, D. R., & Boone, W. (2021). Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the psychometric functioning of the other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical (OLIW) adult playfulness scale. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, Article 100054. 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100054 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Moraes, Y. L., Varella, M. A. C., da Silva, C. S. A., & Valentova, J. V. (2021). Adult playful individuals have more long-and short-term relationships. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, Article e24. 10.1017/ehs.2021.19 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. 10.1111/bjop.12046 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farley, A., Kennedy-Behr, A., & Brown, T. (2021). An investigation into the relationship between playfulness and well-being in Australian adults: An exploratory study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 41(1), 56–64. 10.1177/1539449220945311 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 83–103. 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.83 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 332–346. 10.1177/1088868310361240 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kelley, K. (2017). MBESS (Version 4.0.0 and higher) [Computer software and manual]. http://cran.r-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Personality in the DSM-5: Helping delineating personality disorder content and framing the metastructure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 325–331. 10.1080/00223891.2011.577478 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 28–50. 10.1177/1088868310366253 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2019). Mplus 8 user’s guide. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pang, D., & Proyer, R. T. (2018). An initial cross-cultural comparison of adult playfulness in mainland China and German-speaking countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 421. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00421 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T. (2014). Playfulness over the lifespan and its relation to happiness: Results from an online survey. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 47(6), 508–512. 10.1007/s00391-013-0539-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T. (2017). A new structural model for the study of adult playfulness: Assessment and exploration of an understudied individual differences variable. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 113–122. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., & Brauer, K. (2018). Exploring adult playfulness: Examining the accuracy of personality judgments at zero-acquaintance and an LIWC analysis of textual information. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 12–20. 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.10.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., & Brauer, K. (2023). Assessment of playfulness: Current challenges and overview. In W. RuchA. B. BakkerL. TayF. Gander (Eds.), Psychological assessment—Science and practice: Handbook of positive psychology assessment (pp. 145-161). Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., Brauer, K., & Wolf, A. (2020). Assessing other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical playfulness in adults: Development and initial validation of the OLIW-S using self-and peer-ratings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 624–634. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000531 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., Brauer, K., Wolf, A., & Chick, G. (2019). Adult playfulness and relationship satisfaction: An APIM analysis of romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 40–48. 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Bertenshaw, E. J., & Brauer, K. (2018). The positive relationships of playfulness with indicators of health, activity, and physical fitness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1440. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01440 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Brauer, K., & Chick, G. (2021). Can playfulness be stimulated? A randomised placebo-controlled online playfulness intervention study on effects on trait playfulness, well-being, and depression. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 129–151. 10.1111/aphw.12220 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., & Tandler, N. (2020). An update on the study of playfulness in adolescents: Its relationship with academic performance, well-being, anxiety, and roles in bullying-type-situations. Social Psychology of Education, 23(1), 73–99. 10.1007/s11218-019-09526-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R. T., Tandler, N., & Brauer, K. (2019). Playfulness and creativity: A selective review. In S. R. LuriaJ. BaerJ. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity and humor (pp. 43–60). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813802-1.00002-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubinstein, D., & Lahad, M. (2023). Fantastic reality: The role of imagination, playfulness, and creativity in healing trauma. Traumatology, 29(2), 102–111. 10.1037/trm0000376 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubinstein, D., Lahad, M., Leykin, D., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2021). Development and validation of Fantastic Reality Ability Measurement (FRAME) to measure use of imagination in response to stress and trauma. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 16(4), 412–427‏. 10.1080/15401383.2020.1789017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubinstein, D., O’Rourke, N., & Lahad, M. (2023). Using imagination in response to stress and uncertainty in the time of COVID-19: Further validation of the Fantastic Reality Ability Measurement (FRAME) scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1115233. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1115233 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scharp, Y. S., Bakker, A. B., Breevaart, K., Kruup, K., & Uusberg, A. (2023). Playful work design: Conceptualization, measurement, and validity. Human Relations, 76(4), 509–550. 10.1177/00187267211070996 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, X., Liu, H., & Song, R. (2021). Toward a culture-sensitive approach to playfulness research: Development of the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale-Chinese version and an alternative measurement model. Journal of Leisure Research, 52(4), 401–423. 10.1080/00222216.2020.1850193 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 1–15. 10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tandler, N., & Proyer, R. T. (2022). Deriving information on play and playfulness of 3-to-5-year-olds from short written descriptions: Analyzing the frequency of usage of indicators of playfulness and their associations with maternal playfulness. Behavioral Sciences, 12, Article 385. 10.3390/bs12100385 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short scales—five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000148 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar