Skip to main content
Original communication

Treating great and small saphenous vein insufficiency with histoacryl in patients with symptomatic varicose veins and increased risk of surgery

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000716

Abstract.Background: Treating great and small saphenous vein trunk insufficiency with cyanoacrylate glue is the least taxing treatment method of all available techniques. Due to long-term unavailability of commercial kits with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl) in the Czech Republic, we used a modified technique. Patients and methods: Fifty-six limbs in 49 patients suffering from great saphenous vein or small saphenous vein insufficiency in combination with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency and complicating comorbidities were treated with a modified endovascular cyanoacrylate glue application technique. Results: The immediate success rate of the treatment was 98 %. In follow-up intervals of six weeks, six months, one year, and two years, the anatomical success rates of embolization (recanalization of no more than 5 cm of the junction) were 98, 96, 94, and 94 %, respectively. At identical intervals the venous insufficiency was scored according to the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire and the American Venous Clinical Severity Score. In both cases, improvement was demonstrated over the two-year follow-up, with a 0.5 % significance level. Specific clinical signs of venous insufficiency were also evaluated, such as pain, oedema, clearance of varicose veins, and healing of venous ulceration. One severe complication – a pulmonary embolism – was reported, without consequences. Conclusions: We demonstrated that treating insufficient saphenous veins with modified histoacryl application brought a relief from symptoms of venous insufficiency and that the efficiency of this technique is comparable to commonly used methods.

Literature

  • Almeida JI, Javier JJ, Mackay EG, Bautista C, Cher DJ & Proebstle TM. Two-year follow-up of first human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. 2015;30(6):397–404. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Almeida JI, Javier JJ, Mackay E, Bautista C & Proebstle TM. First human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg. 2013;1:174–80. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Almeida JI, Min RJ, Raabe R, McLean DJ & Madsen M. Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for the Closure of Truncal Veins: 60-Day Swine Model Results. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(7):631–5. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Proebstle TM, Alm J, Dimitri S, Rasmussen L, Whiteley M & Lawson J, et al. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3(1):2–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Almeida JI, Kaufman J, Göckeritz O, Chopra P, Evans MT & Hoheim DF, et al. Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:752–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Proebstle TM, Vago B, Alm J, Göckeritz O, Lebard C & Pichot O. Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:151–6. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • HirschT. Varicose veins therapy and nerve lesions. Vasa. 2017;46(2):96–100. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bozkurt AK & Yilmaz MF. Prospective comparison of a new cyanoacrylate glue and laser ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency. Phlebology. 2016;31:106–13. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Çalık ES, Arslan Ü, Ayaz F, Tort M, Yıldız Z & Aksu V, et al. N-butyl cyanoacrylate in the treatment of venous insufficiency--the effect of embolisation with ablative polymerisation. Vasa. 2016;45(3):241–6. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Pollak JS & White RI Jr. The use of cyanacrylate adhesives in peripheral embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(8):907–13. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hekmat H, Al-toma A, Mallant MP, Mulder CJ & Jacobs MA. Endoscopic N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) obliteration of jejunal varices by using the double balloon enteroscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(2):350–2. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kritzinger J, Klass D, Ho S, Lim H, Buczkowski A, Yoshida E & Liu D. Hepatic embolotherapy in interventional oncology: technology, techniques, and applications. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(1):1–15. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Li YJ, Barthès-Biesel D & Salsac AV. Polymerization kinetics of n-butyl cyanoacrylate glues used for vascular embolization. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69:307–17. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Khilnani NM, Grassi CJ, Kundu S, D‘Agostino HR, Khan AA & McGraw JK, et al. Multi-society consensus quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity superficial venous insufficiency with endovenous thermal ablation from the Society of Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, American College of Phlebology and Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(1):14–31. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Siribumrungwong BA. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Endovenous Ablation and Surgical Intervention in Patients with Varicose Vein European. Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2012;44(2):214–23. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rass, K. Current clinical Evidence on Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) from randomised Trials. Phlebologie. 2016;45(4):181–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sun JJ, Chowdhury MM, Sadat U, Hayes PD & Tang TY. Mechanochemical Ablation for Treatment of Truncal Venous Insufficiency: A Review of the Current Literature. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(10):1422–31. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Park I. Initial Outcomes of Cyanoacrylate Closure, VenaSeal System, for the Treatment of the Incompetent Great and Small Saphenous Veins. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017;51(8):545–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Barker T, Evison F, Benson R & Tiwari A. Risk of venous thromboembolism following surgical treatment of superficial venous incompetence. Vasa. 2017;46(6):484–9. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Levrier O, Mekkaoui C, Rolland PH, Murphy K, Cabrol P & Moulin G, et al. Efficacy and low vascular toxicity of embolization with radical versus anionic polymerization of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA). An experimental study in the swine. J Neuroradiol. 2003;30:95–102. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Guner G, Kurtulan O, Kav T, Sokmensuer C, Gedikoglu G & Akyol A. Cyanoacrylate Associated Foreign Body Granulomatous Gastritis: A Report of Three Cases. Hindawi Case Reports in Pathology. 2017; DOI: 10.1155/2017/2753487. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang YM, Cheng LF & Li N. Histopathological study of vascular changes after intra-arterial and intravenous injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7(3):175–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar