Bailout stenting in femoropopliteal arterial segment
Abstract
Summary:Background: Disabling peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of femoropopliteal segment is usually treated with percutaneous balloon dilatation, and when this is not successful, stent is placed. Long-term patency of stent is often compromised due to in-stent restenosis (ISR). We aimed to identify factors associated with bailout stenting, and to recognise risk factors for ISR in procedures without paclitaxel application. Patients and methods: We analysed 592 consecutive successful femoropopliteal interventions performed in patients with either disabling intermittent claudication or chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI). In patients with stent implantation, clinical and ultrasound (US) examination were performed one year after the intervention to establish the presence of ISR, defined as >50% stenosis on US imaging. Results: Bailout stenting was required in 133 (22.5%) procedures. Patients with stent placement were younger (70±10 vs 72±11 years, p=0.007) and less often presented with CLI (29.3% vs 40.5%, p=0.019). They more often reported smoking (63.2% vs 49.2%, p=0.005), less often had diabetes mellitus (35.3% vs 47.5%, p=0.013) and arterial hypertension (82.0% vs 90.8%; p=0.004). Stenting was also dependent on lesion complexity (TASC II C>B>A; p<0.001). Subgroup analysis of 110 procedures with bare metal stent (BMS) placement performed in 107 patients revealed ISR in 46.4% of stents, in half of cases it was symptomatic. Neither clinical nor lesion characteristics proved to differ between the group of procedures with ISR and group of procedures without ISR. Conclusions: Factors associated with bailout stenting were age, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, smoking, clinical picture of PAD and complexity of treated lesions. We did not find any risk factors influencing development of ISR in BMS.
References
1 ESVM guideline on peripheral arterial disease. VASA. 2019;48:1–79.
2 Routine stent implantation vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2008;30:44–55.
3 . Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(6):CD006767.
4 . Diagnosis, classification, and treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:545–57.
5 . In-stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27:510–24.
6 . Risk of death following application of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in the femoropopliteal artery of the leg: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(24).
7 Mortality not correlated with paclitaxel exposure: an independent patient-level meta-analysis of a drug-coated balloon. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2550–63.
8 Mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices in peripheral artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2538–46.
9 . Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:S5–67.
10 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. Eur Heart J. 2017;2018(39):763–816.
11 . Endovascular stent implantation for treatment of peripheral artery disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007;37:165–70.
12 Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length. Circulation. 2007;116:285–92.
13 . Drug-coated balloon in peripheral artery disease. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2019;20:338–43.
14 Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:267–76.
15 Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation. 2007;115:2745–9.
16 Paclitaxel-eluting stents show superiority to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents in femoropopliteal disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:495–504.
17 Angiographic dissection patterns and patency outcomes after balloon angioplasty for superficial femoral artery disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:367–75.
18 Late outcomes of balloon angioplasty and angioplasty with selective stenting for superficial femoral-popliteal disease are equivalent. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1051–7.
19 Clinical outcomes of balloon angioplasty alone versus nitinol stent implantation in patients with small femoropopliteal artery disease: Observations from the retrospective multicenter analysis for femoropopliteal stenting (REAL-FP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90:790–7.
20 Results of primary stent therapy for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease at 7 years. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:1696–702.
21 Incidence and predictors of in-stent re-stenosis in the superficial femoral artery: evaluation of long-term outcomes by color duplex ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:717–26.
22 Midterm patency after femoropopliteal interventions. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:347–55.
23 . Management of isolated femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:807–10.
24 Drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:667–79.
25 Contemporary outcomes after superficial femoral artery angioplasty and stenting: The influence of TASC classification and runoff score. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:967–74.