Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

The Impact of Feedback on Goal Setting and Task Performance

Testing the Feedback Intervention Theory

Published Online:March 06, 2013https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000101

Abstract

This research project was undertaken in response to Kluger and DeNisi’s (1996) call for more primary studies to investigate specific propositions of the feedback intervention theory (FIT). To study the assumptions of FIT on the level of task-motivation processes, we analyzed the impact of combined positive and negative feedback. Participants (N = 413) performed a series of tasks in which they were to indicate the number of athletes appearing in short video sequences of different sports. After each task performance the participants received manipulated feedback and were to choose between predetermined options (e.g., raise the level of difficulty, maintain the level of difficulty). We found that the participants most frequently raised the difficulty level after receiving positive feedback and maintained the level after receiving negative feedback. There were no significant differences in the performance of participants who raised and those who maintained the difficulty level after receiving positive or negative feedback. However, the performance of participants who raised the difficulty level after receiving positive feedback increased more than that of those who maintained the difficulty level after receiving negative feedback. In addition, we observed an increase in participants’ avoidance behavior in response to repeated negative feedback. The results partially confirmed the assumptions of the FIT.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Self-regulation and ego-threat: Motivated cognition, self-deception, and destructive goal-setting. In P. Gollwitzer, J. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 27–48). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–75. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brunot, S., Huguet, P., Monteil, J.-M. (2000). Performance feedback and self-focused attention in the classroom: When past and present interact. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 271–293. doi 10.1023/a:1009631930740 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Butler, D. L., Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. doi 10.3102/00346543065003245 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, R., Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210–216. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory to human behavior. New York: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cron, W. L., Slocum, J. J. W., VandeWalle, D., Fu, Q. (2005). The role of goal orientation on negative motions and goal-setting when initial performance falls short of one’s performance goal. Human Performance, 18, 55–80. doi 10.1207/ s15327043hup1801_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeShon, R. P., Alexander, R. A. (1996). Goal setting effects on implicit and explicit learning of complex tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 18–36. doi 10.1006/obhd.1996.0002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Donovan, J. J., Williams, K. J. (2003). Missing the mark: Effects of time and causal attributions on goal revision in response to goal-performance discrepancies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 379–390. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.379 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal-setting-performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624–627. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.624 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erez, M. (2005). Goal setting. In N. Nicholson, P. Audia, M. Pillutla (Eds.), Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior (pp. 138–141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, J. S., Wood, R. E. (2004). Feedback specificity, learning opportunities, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 809–821. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hattie, J. (2002, August). Why is it so difficult to enhance self-concept in the classroom: The power of feedback in the self-concept – achievement relationship. Paper presented at the Second Biennial International Conference, Self-Concept Research: Driving International Research Agendas, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from www.self.ox.ac.uk/Conferences/2002_CD_Hattie.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ilgen, D. R., Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550–565. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ilies, R., Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ilies, R., Judge, T. A., Wagner, D. T. (2010). The influence of cognitive and affective reactions to feedback on subsequent goals. European Psychologist, 15, 121–131. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Jussim, L., Soffin, S., Brown, R., Ley, J., Kohlhepp, K. (1992). Understanding reactions to feedback by integrating ideas from symbolic interactionism and cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 402–421. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.402 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klein, W. M. (1997). Objective standards are not enough: Affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 763–774. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.763 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kluger, A. N., DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lipnevich, A. A., Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal-setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Magill, R. A. (2001). Augmented feedback in motor skill acquisition. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 86–114). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mason, J. B., Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from dwb4.unl.edu/dwb/Research/MB/MasonBruning.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCalley, L. T., de Vries, P. W., Midden, C. J. H. (2011). Consumer response to product-integrated energy feedback: Behavior, goal level shifts, and energy conservation. Environment and Behavior, 43, 525–545. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745–783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51, 214–228. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. D. van Merrienboer, M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Narciss, S., Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. Niegemann, D. Leutner, R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–196). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3–8. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Phillips, J. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R. (1996). Prevalence and prediction of positive discrepancy creation: Examining a discrepancy between two self-regulation theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 498–511. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Fahr, J.-L. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal-setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 45–67. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., Butera, F. (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 683–700. doi 10.1037/a0023911 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Senko, C., Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 320–336. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tolli, A. P., Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 692–701. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vancouver, J. B., Tischner, E. C. (2004). The effect of feedback sign on task performance depends on self-concept discrepancies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1092–1098. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., Slocum, Jr., J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629–640. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Venables, L., Fairclough, S. (2009). The influence of performance feedback on goal-setting and mental effort regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33(1), 63–74. doi 10.1007/s11031-008-9116-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams, K. J., Donovan, J. J., Dodge, T. L. (2000). Self-regulation of performance: Goal establishment and goal revision processes in athletes. Human Performance, 13, 159–180. doi 10.1207/s15327043hup1302_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wulf, G., Shea, C., Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44, 75–84. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar