Skip to main content
Open AccessOriginalarbeit

Effekte des Good Behavior Game bei Grundschüler_innen mit externalisierenden Verhaltensproblemen

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/2235-0977/a000410

Zusammenfassung:Hintergrund: Das Good Behavior Game (GBG; Barrish, Saunders & Wolf, 1969) ist eine wirksame verhaltensmodifikatorische Intervention zur Verbesserung des Verhaltens von Schüler_innen im Unterricht. Allerdings ist der Kenntnisstand zur Effektivität der Maßnahme bei Schüler_innen mit externalisierenden Verhaltensproblemen auf individueller Ebene insgesamt gering. Methoden: Die aktuelle Studie untersucht die Auswirkungen des GBG auf das störende Verhalten (SV) und das lernförderliche Verhalten (LV) von 20 Grundschüler_innen mit externalisierenden Verhaltensproblemen der dritten Klasse auf individueller Ebene. Es wurde ein Multipler-Grundraten-Versuchsplan mit A–B Design verwendet. Zur fallübergreifenden Schätzung der Effekte wurden die Daten mittels hierarchischer stückweiser Regression analysiert. Ergebnisse: Die Befunde der Mehrebenenanalysen unter Berücksichtigung aller 20 Einzelfälle weisen sowohl für die Spielphase (GBG-Phase) als auch für den gesamten Schultag signifikante Level-Effekte auf beiden Dimensionen (SV und LV) nach. Während sich das lernförderliche Verhalten verbessert, geht das Störverhalten zurück. Diskussion: Demnach zeigt sich ein unmittelbarer Interventionseffekt auf das Verhalten der Schüler_innen. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen bisherige Untersuchungen zur Wirksamkeit des GBG bei Schüler_innen mit Verhaltensproblemen. Eine wesentliche Erweiterung stellen die Einzelfallbefunde zur Verhaltensentwicklung der Schüler_innen außerhalb der Spielphasen dar (Transfereffekte).


Effects of the Good Behavior Game on Primary School Students with Externalizing Behavior Problems

Abstract:Background: The Good Behavior Game (GBG; Barrish, Saunders & Wolf, 1969) is an effective behavior modification intervention for improving students' classroom behavior. However, less is known about the effects on individual students with externalizing behavior problems. Methods: The current study examined the impact of the GBG on disruptive behavior (DB) and academic engagement (AE) of 20 at-risk 3rd grade elementary students at the individual level. A multiple baseline design with an A–B format was used. Hierarchical Piecewise Regression was applied to analyze the data across cases. Results: The findings of the multilevel approach revealed significant level effects on both dimensions (DB and AE) for the play phase (GBG phase) as well as for the whole school day. While academic engagement improves, disruptive behavior decreases. Discussion: Thus, there is an immediate intervention effect on students' behavior. Our results support previous research indicating that the GBG is an appropriate classroom-based intervention for students with behavior problems and expand the findings regarding students' behavioral development outside the GBG phase based on single-case data.

Literatur

  • Alresheed, F. , Hott, B. L. & Bano, C. (2013). Single Subject Research: A Synthesis of Analytic Methods. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship , 2 , 1–18. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ashworth, E. , Humphrey, N. , Lendrum, A. & Hennessey, A. (2020): Beyond "what works": A mixed-methods study of intervention effect modifiers in the Good Behavior Game. Psychology in the Schools , 57 , 222–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barkmann, C. & Schulte-Markwort, M. (2012). Prevalence of emotional and behavioural disorders in German children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1979-) , 66 , 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.102467 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barrish, H. , Saunders, M. & Wolf, M. (1969). Good behavior game. Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 2 , 119–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowman-Perrott, L. , Burke, M. , Zaini, S. , Zhang, N. & Vannest, K. (2015). Promoting Positive Behavior Using the Good Behavior Game: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 18 , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715592355 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Briesch, A. M. , Chafouleas, S. M. & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2010). Generalizability and Dependability of Behavior Assessment Methods to Estimate Academic Engagement: A Comparison of Systematic Direct Observation and Direct Behavior Rating. School Psychology Review , 39 , 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087761 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casale, G. , Grosche, M. , Volpe, R. J. & Hennemann, T. (2017). Zuverlässigkeit von Verhaltensverlaufsdiagnostik über Rater und Messzeitpunkte bei Schülern mit externalisierenden Verhaltensproblemen. Empirische Sonderpädagogik , 9 , 143–164. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Casale, G. , Hennemann, T. & Grosche, M. (2015). Zum Beitrag der Verlaufsdiagnostik für eine evidenzbasierte sonderpädagogische Praxis am Beispiel des Förderschwerpunktes der emotionalen und sozialen Entwicklung. Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik , 7 , 325–334. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Casale, G. , Hennemann, T. , Huber, C. & Grosche, M. (2015) Testgütekriterien der Verlaufsdiagnostik von Schülerverhalten im Förderschwerpunkt Emotionale und soziale Entwicklung. Heilpädagogische Forschung , 41 , 37–54. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Casale, G. , Hennemann, T. , Volpe, R. J. , Briesch, A. M. & Grosche, M. (2015). Generalisierbarkeit und Zuverlässigkeit von Direkten Verhaltensbeurteilungen des Lern- und Arbeitsverhaltens in einer inklusiven Grundschulklasse. Empirische Sonderpädagogik , 7 , 258–268. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chaffee, R. K. , Briesch, A. M. , Johnson, A. H. & Volpe, R. J. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Class-Wide Interventions for Supporting Student Behavior. School Psychology Review , 46 , 149–164. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0015.V46-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chafouleas, S. M. (2011). Direct behavior rating: A review of the issues and research in its development. Education And Treatment of Children , 34 , 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0034 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chafouleas, S. M. , Sanetti, L. M. , Kilgus, S. P. & Maggin, D. M. (2012). Evaluating sensitivity to behavioral change using direct behavior rating single-item scales. Exceptional Children , 78 , 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800406 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christ, T. J. , Riley-Tillman, T. C. & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Foundation for the development and use of direct behavior rating (DBR) to assess and evaluate student behavior. Assessment for Effective Intervention , 34 , 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508409340390 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donaldson, J. M. , Fisher, A. B. & Kahng, S. W. (2017). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on individual student behavior. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice , 17 , 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Embry, D. D. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A Best Practice Candidate as a Universal Behavioral Vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review , 5 , 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020977107086 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fabiano, G. & Pyle, K. (2019). Best practices in school mental health for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A framework for intervention. School Mental Health , 11 , 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9267-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flower, A. , McKenna, J. W. , Bunuan, R. L. , Muething, C. S. & Vega, R. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on Challenging Behaviors in School Settings. Review of Educational Research , 84 , 546–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314536781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gebhardt, M. , DeVries, J. , Jungjohann, J. , Casale, G. , Gegenfurtner, A. & Kuhn, J.-T. (2019). Measurement invariance of a direct behavior rating multi item scale across occasions. Social Sciences , 8 , 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020046 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 38 , 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groves, E. A. & Austin, J. L. (2017). An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 50 , 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groves, E. A. & Austin, J. L. (2019). Does the Good Behavior Game evoke negative peer pressure? Analyses in primary and secondary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 52 , 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.513 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanisch, C. , Casale, G. , Volpe, R. J. , Briesch, A. M. , Richard, S. , Meyer, H. et al. (2019). Gestufte Förderung in der Grundschule: Konzeption eines mehrstufigen, multimodalen Förderkonzeptes bei expansivem Problemverhalten. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung , 14 , 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-018-0700-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hillenbrand, C. & Pütz, K. (2008). KlasseKinderSpiel. Spielerisch Verhaltensregeln lernen . Hamburg: Edition Körber Stiftung. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, A. D. & Yu, C. C. (2015). Descriptive statistics for modern test score distributions: Skewness, kurtosis, discreteness, and ceiling effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 75 , 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414548576. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hölling, H. , Schlack, R. , Petermann, F. , Ravens-Sieberer, U. & Mauz, E. (2014). Psychische Auffälligkeiten und psychosoziale Beeinträchtigungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen im Alter von 3 bis 17 Jahren in Deutschland – Prävalenz und zeitliche Trends zu 2 Erhebungszeitpunkten (2003–2006 und 2009–2012). Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz , 57 , 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-1979-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huber, C. & Rietz, C. (2015). Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) als Methode zur Verhaltensverlaufsdiagnostik in der Schule: Ein systematisches Review von Methodenstudien. Empirische Sonderpädagogik , 2 , 75–98. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Huitema, B. E. & Mckean, J. W. (2000). Design Specification Issues in Time-Series Intervention Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 60 , 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970358 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jain, A. & Spieß, R. (2012). Versuchspläne der experimentellen Einzelfallforschung. Empirische Sonderpädagogik , 4 , 211–245. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Joslyn, P. R. & Vollmer, T. R. (2020). Efficacy of teacher-implemented good behavior game despite low treatment integrity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 53 , 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.614 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kellam, S. G. , Ling, X. , Merisca, R. , Brown, C. H. & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology , 10 , 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579498001564 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kellam, S. G. , Rebok, G. W. , Ialongo, N. & Mayer, L. S. (1994). The course and malleability of aggressive behavior from early first grade into middle school: Results of a developmental epidemiologically-based preventive trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 35 , 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01161.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klipker, K. , Baumgarten, F. , Göbel, K. , Lampert, T. & Hölling, H. (2018). Psychische Auffälligkeiten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland – Querschnittergebnisse aus KiGGS Welle 2 und Trends. Journal of Health Monitoring , 37–45. https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-077 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kratochwill, T. R. & Levin, J. R. (2010). Enhancing the Scientific Credibility of Single-Case Intervention Research: Randomization to the Rescue. Psychological Methods , 15 , 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lane, K. L. & Menzies, H. M. (2005). Teacher-identified students with and without academic and behavioral concerns: Characteristics and responsiveness. Behavioral Disorders , 31 , 65–83. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leflot, G. , van Lier, P. A. C. , Onghena, P. & Colpin, H. (2010). The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: An intervention study with the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 38 , 869–882. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leflot, G. , van Lier, P. A. C. , Onghena, P. & Colpin, H. (2013). The role of children's on-task behavior in the prevention of aggressive behavior development and peer rejection: A randomized controlled study of the Good Behavior Game in Belgian elementary classrooms. Journal of School Psychology , 51 , 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.12.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manolov, R. & Moeyaert, M. (2017). Recommendations for Choosing Single-Case Data Analytical Techniques. Behavior Therapy , 48 , 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.04.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moeyaert, M. , Ferron, J. M. , Beretvas, S. N. & Van den Noortgate, W. (2014). From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs. Journal of School Psychology , 52 , 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, R. I. & Vannest, K. (2009). An Improved Effect Size for Single-Case Research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs. Behavior Therapy , 40 , 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, R. I. , Vannest, K. J. , Davis, J. L. & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining non-overlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy , 42 , 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pennington, B. & McComas, J. J. (2017). Effects of the Good Behavior Game across classroom contexts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 50 , 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.357 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poduska, J. M. & Kurki, A. (2014). Guided by Theory, Informed by Practice: Training and Support for the Good Behavior Game, a Classroom-Based Behavior Management Strategy. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders , 22 , 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426614522692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Zugriff am 14.02.2022. https://www.r-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ravens-Sieberer, U. , Kaman, A. , Otto, C. , Adedeji, A. , Napp, A.-K. , Becker, M. et al. (2021). Seelische Gesundheit und psychische Belastungen von Kindern und Jugendlichen in der ersten Welle der COVID-19-Pandemie – Ergebnisse der COPSY-Studie. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz , 64 , 1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-021-03291-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richard, S. , Eichelberger, I. , Döpfner, M. & Hanisch, C. (2015). Schulbasierte Interventionen bei ADHS und Aufmerksamkeitsproblemen: Ein Überblick. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie , 29 , 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000141 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rindskopf, D. & Ferron, J. M. (2014). Using multilevel models to analyze single-case design data. In T. R. Kratochwill J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances (S. 221–246). https://doi.org/10.1037/14376-008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spilles, M. & Hagen, T. (2019). Schulpraktische Erhebungs- und Auswertungsmöglichkeiten von Einzelfalldaten. Potsdamer Zentrum für empirische Inklusionsforschung (ZEIF) , Nr. 3, 1–14. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tingstrom, D. H. , Sterling-Turner, H. E. & Wilczynski, S. M. (2006). The Good Behavior Game: 1969 2002. Behavior Modification , 30 , 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503261165. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van den Noortgate, W. & Onghena, P. (2003). Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers , 35 , 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Volpe, R. J. & Briesch, A. M. (2012). Generalizability and Dependability of Single-Item and Multiple-Item Direct Behavior Rating Scales for Engagement and Disruptive Behavior. School Psychology Review , 41 , 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087506 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waschbusch, D. A. , Breaux, R. P. & Babinski, D. E. (2019). School-based interventions for aggression and defiance in youth: a framework for evidence-based practice. School Mental Health , 11 , 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9269-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilbert, J. & Lüke, T. (2021). Single-Case Data Analyses for Single and Multiple AB Designs (scan) (Version 0.53) [R]. Zugriff am 06.10.2021. https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/scan First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilbert, J. (2021). Analyzing Single-Case Data with R and Scan . Zugriff am 14.02.2022. https://jazznbass.github.io/scan-Book/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilbert, J. , Börnert-Ringleb, M. & Lüke, T. (2022). Statistical Power of Piecewise Regression Analyses of Single-Case Experimental Studies Addressing Behavior Problems. Frontiers in Education , 7 , Article 917944. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.917944 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Witvliet, M. , van Lier, P. A. C. , Cuijpers, P. & Koot, H. M. (2009). Testing links between childhood positive peer relations and externalizing outcomes through a randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 77 , 905–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014597 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar