Skip to main content
Open AccessOriginalarbeit

Die 5-Item-Skala zur Messung der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität (SMS-5) im Lern- und Leistungskontext

Eine Validierungsstudie

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000230

Zusammenfassung. In Leistungssituationen sind Personen angehalten Selbstkontrolle aufzuwenden, um ihre Aufmerksamkeit, Gedanken und Emotionen zielgerichtet zu regulieren. Selbstkontrolle wird als begrenzte mentale Kapazität betrachtet, die situativen Fluktuationen unterliegt und sich kurzfristig erschöpfen kann. In dieser Validierungsstudie stellen wir eine 5-Item-Skala zur Messung der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität (SMS-5) basierend auf der State Self-Control Capacity Scale (SSCCS) vor, mit dem Ziel auch in kurzen zeitlichen Abständen intra- und interindividuelle Variabilitäten der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität (d. h. die Ausprägung der empfundenen mentalen Erschöpfung) ökonomisch abzubilden und externe Kriterien im Lern- und Leistungskontext valide vorherzusagen. Die interne Struktur der SMS-5 erwies sich in Stichproben von Auszubildenden (N = 2 395), Zehntklässlerinnen und Zehntklässlern (N = 129) und Studierenden (N = 95; N = 140) als eindimensional. Zusammenfassend zeichnete sich die SMS-5 als valides, reliables, über Ausbildungsgruppen, Geschlecht und Zeit invariantes und änderungssensitives Instrument zur ökonomischen Messung der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität im Lern- und Leistungskontext ab, das gegenüber der SSCCS in der Vorhersage externer Kriterien vergleichbar gut abschnitt. Die SMS-5 empfiehlt sich besonders, um durch kurzfristig wiederholte Messungen, Veränderungen der Selbstkontrollkapazität im zeitlichen Verlauf von Lern- und Leistungshandlungen abzubilden.


Measuring Self-Control Depletion in Achievement Situations: A Validation of the 5-Item Brief State Self-Control Capacity Scale

Abstract. In achievement situations, individuals need to invest self-control in order to regulate their attention, thoughts, and emotions in a goal-directed manner. Research suggests that exerting self-control leads to decreasing self-control performance over time as a result of the short-term depletion of individuals’ state self-control capacity. In four studies, we validated a new version – the 5-item scale for measuring the momentary self-control capacity (SMS-5; English version available in Table 1) – of Ciarocco’s State Self-Control Capacity Scale (SSCCS) to assess changes in people’s perceived state self-control capacity (i.e., degree of perceived mental exhaustion) in achievement situations. Drawing on German samples of apprentices in vocational education and training (N = 2,395), tenth-graders (N = 129), and university students (N = 95; N = 140), we replicated the unidimensional internal structure of the SMS-5. Moreover, measurement invariance was supported for different groups of apprentices, for gender, and over time. The SMS-5 performed as well as the SSCCS in predicting achievement-related outcome variables and is a viable option for repeatedly assessing individuals’ perceived state self-control capacity and for tracking mental exhaustion over time.

Literatur

  • Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Misguided effort with elusive implications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 574 – 575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652878 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351 – 355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertrams, A. & Dickhäuser, O. (2009). Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D). Diagnostica, 55, 2 – 10. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.1.2 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bertrams, A., Englert, C. & Dickhäuser, O. (2010). Self-control strength in the relation between trait test anxiety and state anxiety. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 738 – 741. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2010.09.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertrams, A., Englert, C., Dickhäuser, O. & Baumeister, R. F. (2013). Role of self-control strength in the relation between anxiety and cognitive performance. Emotion, 13, 668 – 680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031921 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertrams, A., Unger, A. & Dickhäuser, O. (2011). Momentan verfügbare Selbstkontrollkraft – Vorstellung eines Messinstruments und erste Befunde aus pädagogisch-psychologischen Kontexten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 185 – 196. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000042 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49 – 59. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7962581 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brickenkamp, R., Schmidt-Atzert, L. & Liepmann, D. (2010). Test d2-Revision: Aufmerksamkeits- und Konzentrationstest. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J. & Muthén, B. O. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456 – 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464 – 504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233 – 255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ciarocco, N. J., Twenge, J. M., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (2007). Measuring state self-control: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Unpublished manuscript, Monmouth University, NJ, USA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clarkson, J. J., Hirt, E. R., Jia, L. & Alexander, M. B. (2010). When perception is more than reality: The effects of perceived versus actual resource depletion on self-regulatory behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 29 – 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diestel, S., Rivkin, W. & Schmidt, K.-H. (2015). Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: Results from two diary studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 809 – 827. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038373 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M. & Schmitt, M. (2015). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden. Lehrbuch; mit Online-Materialien. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Friese, M., Messner, C. & Schaffner, Y. (2012). Mindfulness meditation counteracts self-control depletion. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1016 – 1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Germeys, L. & De Gieter, S. (2018). A diary study on the role of psychological detachment in the spillover of self-control demands to employees’ ego depletion and the crossover to their partner. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 140 – 152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1417259 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guenole, N. & Brown, A. (2014). The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1 – 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00980 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A. R. et al. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546 – 573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C. & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495 – 525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, K. A. & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision. KFT 4 – 12+ R. Göttingen: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179 – 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M. & Berkman, E. (2015). Six questions for the resource model of control (and some answers). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 511 – 524. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12200 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M. & Legault, L. (2014). No pain, no gain: How distress underlies effective self-control (and unites diverse social psychological phenomena). In J. P. ForgasE. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology. Motivation and its regulation: The control within (pp. 115 – 132). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M. & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450 – 463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454134 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J. & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127 – 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katzenbach, M., Blum, W., Drüke-Noe, C., Keller, K., Köller, O., Leiss, D. et al. (2009). Bildungsstandards: Kompetenzen überprüfen. Mathematik Sekundarstufe I. (Heft 1 & 2). Berlin: Cornelsen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kotabe, H. P. & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 618 – 638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kühnel, J., Syrek, C. J. & Dreher, A. (2018). Why don’t you go to bed on time? A daily diary study on the relationships between chronotype, self-control resources and the phenomenon of bedtime procrastination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 77. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2018.00077 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kwan, M. Y. W., Bedard, C., King-Dowling, S., Wellman, S. & Cairney, J. (2016). MovingU: A prospective cohort study to understand behavioural and environmental contexts influencing physical activity during the transition into emerging adulthood. BMC Public Health, 16, 728. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3372-7 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lian, H., Yam, K. C., Ferris, D. L. & Brown, D. (2017). Self-control at work. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 703 – 732. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0126 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindner, C., Nagy, G., Ramos Arhuis, W. A. & Retelsdorf, J. (2017). A new perspective on the interplay between self-control and cognitive performance: Modeling progressive depletion patterns. PLoS ONE, 12, e0180149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180149 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindner, C., Nagy, G. & Retelsdorf, J. (2015). The dimensionality of the Brief Self-Control Scale—An evaluation of unidimensional and multidimensional applications. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 465 – 473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindner, C., Nagy, G. & Retelsdorf, J. (2018). The need for self-control in achievement tests: Changes in students’ state self-control capacity and effort investment. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 1113 – 1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9455-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P. & Card, N. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 357 – 365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W. & Card, N. A. (2006). A Non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 59 – 72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lurquin, J. H. & Miyake, A. (2017). Challenges to ego-depletion research go beyond the replication crisis: A need for tackling the conceptual crisis. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 568 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00568 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. In G. TenenbaumR. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774 – 798). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch35 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. & Hau, K.-T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit. Is parsimony always desirable? The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364 – 390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.10806604 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In J. R. NesselroadeR. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561 – 614). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_17 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Musch, J., Brockhaus, R. & Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit. Diagnostica, 48, 121 – 129. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.48.3.121 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Authors. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879 – 903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prem, R., Kubicek, B., Diestel, S. & Korunka, C. (2016). Regulatory job stressors and their within-person relationships with ego depletion: The roles of state anxiety, self-control effort, and job autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 22 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rivkin, W., Diestel, S. & Schmidt, K.-H. (2014). The positive relationship between servant leadership and employees’ psychological health: A multi-method approach. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 28, 52 – 72. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/239700221402800104 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rivkin, W., Diestel, S. & Schmidt, K.-H. (2015). Affective commitment as a moderator of the adverse relationships between day-specific self-control demands and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 185 – 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rowland, Z., Wenzel, M. & Kubiak, T. (2016). The effects of computer-based mindfulness training on self-control and mindfulness within ambulatorily assessed network systems across health-related domains in a healthy student population (SMASH): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17, 570. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1707-4 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Salmon, S. J., De Vet, E., Adriaanse, M. A., Fennis, B. M., Veltkamp, M. & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2015). Social proof in the supermarket: Promoting healthy choices under low self-control conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 113 – 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D. & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33 – 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.33 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schöndube, A., Bertrams, A., Sudeck, G. & Fuchs, R. (2017). Self-control strength and physical exercise: An ecological momentary assessment study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 29, 19 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYCHSPORT.2016.11.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence“, objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201 – 292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross‐national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78 – 90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45, 173 – 177. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F. & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271 – 324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., Shmueli, D. & Muraven, M. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 379 – 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Welsh, D. T. & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 79 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2013.07.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar