Die 5-Item-Skala zur Messung der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität (SMS-5) im Lern- und Leistungskontext
Eine Validierungsstudie
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. In Leistungssituationen sind Personen angehalten Selbstkontrolle aufzuwenden, um ihre Aufmerksamkeit, Gedanken und Emotionen zielgerichtet zu regulieren. Selbstkontrolle wird als begrenzte mentale Kapazität betrachtet, die situativen Fluktuationen unterliegt und sich kurzfristig erschöpfen kann. In dieser Validierungsstudie stellen wir eine 5-Item-Skala zur Messung der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität (SMS-5) basierend auf der State Self-Control Capacity Scale (SSCCS) vor, mit dem Ziel auch in kurzen zeitlichen Abständen intra- und interindividuelle Variabilitäten der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität (d. h. die Ausprägung der empfundenen mentalen Erschöpfung) ökonomisch abzubilden und externe Kriterien im Lern- und Leistungskontext valide vorherzusagen. Die interne Struktur der SMS-5 erwies sich in Stichproben von Auszubildenden (N = 2 395), Zehntklässlerinnen und Zehntklässlern (N = 129) und Studierenden (N = 95; N = 140) als eindimensional. Zusammenfassend zeichnete sich die SMS-5 als valides, reliables, über Ausbildungsgruppen, Geschlecht und Zeit invariantes und änderungssensitives Instrument zur ökonomischen Messung der momentan verfügbaren Selbstkontrollkapazität im Lern- und Leistungskontext ab, das gegenüber der SSCCS in der Vorhersage externer Kriterien vergleichbar gut abschnitt. Die SMS-5 empfiehlt sich besonders, um durch kurzfristig wiederholte Messungen, Veränderungen der Selbstkontrollkapazität im zeitlichen Verlauf von Lern- und Leistungshandlungen abzubilden.
Abstract. In achievement situations, individuals need to invest self-control in order to regulate their attention, thoughts, and emotions in a goal-directed manner. Research suggests that exerting self-control leads to decreasing self-control performance over time as a result of the short-term depletion of individuals’ state self-control capacity. In four studies, we validated a new version – the 5-item scale for measuring the momentary self-control capacity (SMS-5; English version available in Table 1) – of Ciarocco’s State Self-Control Capacity Scale (SSCCS) to assess changes in people’s perceived state self-control capacity (i.e., degree of perceived mental exhaustion) in achievement situations. Drawing on German samples of apprentices in vocational education and training (N = 2,395), tenth-graders (N = 129), and university students (N = 95; N = 140), we replicated the unidimensional internal structure of the SMS-5. Moreover, measurement invariance was supported for different groups of apprentices, for gender, and over time. The SMS-5 performed as well as the SSCCS in predicting achievement-related outcome variables and is a viable option for repeatedly assessing individuals’ perceived state self-control capacity and for tracking mental exhaustion over time.
Literatur
2016). Misguided effort with elusive implications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 574 – 575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652878
(2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351 – 355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
(2009). Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D). Diagnostica, 55, 2 – 10. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.1.2
(2010). Self-control strength in the relation between trait test anxiety and state anxiety. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 738 – 741. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2010.09.005
(2013). Role of self-control strength in the relation between anxiety and cognitive performance. Emotion, 13, 668 – 680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031921
(2011). Momentan verfügbare Selbstkontrollkraft – Vorstellung eines Messinstruments und erste Befunde aus pädagogisch-psychologischen Kontexten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 185 – 196. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000042
(1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49 – 59. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7962581
(2010). Test d2-Revision: Aufmerksamkeits- und Konzentrationstest. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456 – 466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464 – 504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
(2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233 – 255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(2007). Measuring state self-control: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Unpublished manuscript, Monmouth University, NJ, USA.
(2010). When perception is more than reality: The effects of perceived versus actual resource depletion on self-regulatory behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 29 – 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017539
(2015). Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: Results from two diary studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 809 – 827. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038373
(2015). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden. Lehrbuch; mit Online-Materialien. Weinheim: Beltz.
(2012). Mindfulness meditation counteracts self-control depletion. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1016 – 1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.008
(2018). A diary study on the role of psychological detachment in the spillover of self-control demands to employees’ ego depletion and the crossover to their partner. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 140 – 152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1417259
(2014). The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1 – 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00980
(2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546 – 573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873
(2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495 – 525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486
(2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision. KFT 4 – 12+ R. Göttingen: Beltz.
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179 – 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
(2015). Six questions for the resource model of control (and some answers). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 511 – 524. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12200
(2014).
(No pain, no gain: How distress underlies effective self-control (and unites diverse social psychological phenomena) . In J. P. ForgasE. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology. Motivation and its regulation: The control within (pp. 115 – 132). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450 – 463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454134
(2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127 – 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009
(2009). Bildungsstandards: Kompetenzen überprüfen. Mathematik Sekundarstufe I. (Heft 1 & 2). Berlin: Cornelsen.
(2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 618 – 638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382
(2018). Why don’t you go to bed on time? A daily diary study on the relationships between chronotype, self-control resources and the phenomenon of bedtime procrastination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 77. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2018.00077
(2016). MovingU: A prospective cohort study to understand behavioural and environmental contexts influencing physical activity during the transition into emerging adulthood. BMC Public Health, 16, 728. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3372-7
(2017). Self-control at work. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 703 – 732. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0126
(2017). A new perspective on the interplay between self-control and cognitive performance: Modeling progressive depletion patterns. PLoS ONE, 12, e0180149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180149
(2015). The dimensionality of the Brief Self-Control Scale—An evaluation of unidimensional and multidimensional applications. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 465 – 473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.006
(2018). The need for self-control in achievement tests: Changes in students’ state self-control capacity and effort investment. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 1113 – 1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9455-9
(2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 357 – 365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757
(2006). A Non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 59 – 72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3
(2017). Challenges to ego-depletion research go beyond the replication crisis: A need for tackling the conceptual crisis. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 568 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00568
(2007).
(Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology . In G. TenenbaumR. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774 – 798). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch351996). Assessing goodness of fit. Is parsimony always desirable? The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364 – 390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.10806604
(1988).
(Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data . In J. R. NesselroadeR. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561 – 614). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_172002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit. Diagnostica, 48, 121 – 129. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.48.3.121
(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Authors.
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879 – 903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(2016). Regulatory job stressors and their within-person relationships with ego depletion: The roles of state anxiety, self-control effort, and job autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 22 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.004
(2014). The positive relationship between servant leadership and employees’ psychological health: A multi-method approach. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 28, 52 – 72. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/239700221402800104
(2015). Affective commitment as a moderator of the adverse relationships between day-specific self-control demands and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 185 – 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.005
(2016). The effects of computer-based mindfulness training on self-control and mindfulness within ambulatorily assessed network systems across health-related domains in a healthy student population (SMASH): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17, 570. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1707-4
(2015). Social proof in the supermarket: Promoting healthy choices under low self-control conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 113 – 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.004
(2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33 – 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.33
(2017). Self-control strength and physical exercise: An ecological momentary assessment study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 29, 19 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYCHSPORT.2016.11.006
(1904). “General Intelligence“, objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201 – 292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross‐national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78 – 90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
(1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45, 173 – 177. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173
(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271 – 324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
(2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 379 – 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.007
(2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 79 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2013.07.006
(