Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Open AccessOriginalarbeit

Mittendrin oder nur dabei?

Konsequenzen des Inklusionserlebens am Arbeitsplatz für Gesundheit, Wohlbefinden und Produktivität von Menschen mit dauerhaften gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigungen

Published Online:May 25, 2022https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000392

Abstract

Zusammenfassung. Subjektive Sichtweisen von Arbeitnehmenden mit dauerhaften gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigungen (dgB) spielen in der quantitativen Forschung zur beruflichen Inklusion bisher eine untergeordnete Rolle. In der vorliegenden Fragebogenstudie wurden daher N = 1006 Betroffene zu ihrem Inklusionserleben, möglichen Konsequenzen, vermittelnden psychologischen Prozessen und der Rolle der Bedürfnisse nach Zugehörigkeit und Authentizität befragt. In Strukturgleichungsmodellierungen mittels Partial-Least-Squares zeigten sich signifikante Zusammenhänge zwischen Inklusionserleben und günstigen Ausprägungen von Indikatoren für Gesundheit, Wohlbefinden und Produktivität, die insbesondere durch eine verminderte affektive Rumination und eine positive Sichtweise auf das Leben mit einer dgB vermittelt wurden. Eine moderierende Rolle der Bedürfnisse nach Zugehörigkeit und Authentizität zeigte sich in den Daten nicht. Die Ergebnisse unterstreichen die Relevanz des Konstrukts Inklusionserleben für Forschung zu beruflicher Teilhabe und die Gestaltung inklusiver Arbeitsumgebungen.


Right in the Thick of it or Just Along for the Ride? The Consequences of Perceived Work-Related Inclusion on the Health, Well-Being, and Productivity of Individuals with Chronic Health Impairments

Abstract. The subjective perspectives of employees with chronic health impairments (CHI) have so far played a minor role in quantitative research on work-related inclusion. In the present questionnaire-based study, we surveyed N = 1,006 individuals with CHI about how they perceive inclusion, the possible consequences, mediating psychological processes, and the role their need for belongingness and authenticity plays. We applied structural equation modeling using partial least squares. We found significant associations between perceived inclusion and beneficial outcomes for multiple indicators of health, well-being, and productivity, mediated in particular by reduced affective rumination and a positive view of life with a CHI. The data did not reveal a moderating role of the need for belongingness and authenticity. The findings highlight the relevance of the construct of perceived inclusion for research on occupational participation and the design of inclusive work settings.

Literatur

  • Ahlstrom, L., Grimby-Ekman, A., Hagberg, M. & Dellve, L. (2010). The work ability index and single-item question: Associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health – A prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 36, 404 – 412. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aktion Mensch (2017). Inklusionsbarometer Arbeit. Ein Instrument zur Messung von Fortschritten bei der Inklusion von Menschen mit Behinderung auf dem deutschen Arbeitsmarkt. Bonn: Autor. https://delivery-aktion-mensch.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/aktion-mensch-inklusionsbarometer-2017.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baldridge, D. C., Beatty, J. E., Boehm, S. A., Kulkarni, M. & Moore, M. E. (2018). Persons With (dis)Abilities. In A. ColellaE. B. King (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination (pp. 111 – 128). New York, NY: Oxford University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497 – 529. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beekman, J. B., Stock, M. L. & Marcus, T. (2016). Need to belong, not rejection sensitivity, moderates cortisol response, self-reported stress, and negative affect following social exclusion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156 (2), 131 – 138. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., László, Z., Kemper, C. J. & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Kurzskala zur Erfassung der Allgemeinen Lebenszufriedenheit (L-1) (GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Hrsg.). (Working Papers Nr. 33). Mannheim: GESIS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bishop, J. W., Scott, K. D. & Burroughs, S. M. (2016). Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management, 26, 1113 – 1132. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blanco-Encomienda, F. J., García-Cantero, R. & Latorre-Medina, M. J. (2020). Association between work-related rumination, work environment and employee well-being: A meta-analytic study of main and moderator effects. Social Indicators Research, 150, 887 – 910. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Böcken, J., Brechtel, T. & Meierjürgen, R. (2016). Gesundheitsmonitor. 15 Jahre Datenanalysen und wissenschaftliche Studien zum deutschen Gesundheitswesen (Bertelsmann Stiftung & Barmer GEK, Hrsg.). (Gesundheitsmonitor Newsletter 4/16). https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/VV_GeMo_NL_2016-4.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305 – 314. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boyd Ritsher, J., Otilingam, P. G. & Grajales, M. (2003). Internalized stigma of mental illness: Psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Research, 121 (1), 31 – 49. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185 – 216. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (Hrsg.). (2021). Dritter Teilhabebericht der Bundesregierung über die Lebenslagen von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. Teilhabe – Beeinträchtigung – Behinderung. Bonn: Autor. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burr, H., Berthelsen, H., Moncada, S., Nübling, M., Dupret, E., Demiral, Y. et al. (2019). The third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Safety and Health at Work, 10, 482 – 503. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chakraverty, V., Niehaus, M. & Zimmer, H. (2019, September). Das Bedürfnis nach Authentizität – Entwicklung einer neuen Skala. 11. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Braunschweig, Germany. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chaudoir, S. R. & Fisher, J. D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision-making and post-disclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 236 – 256. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cropley, M., Michalianou, G., Pravettoni, G. & Millward, L. J. (2012). The relation of post-work ruminative thinking with eating behaviour. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 28 (1), 23 – 30. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227 – 268. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Derogatis, L. R. (2000). Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Emmerich, A. I. & Rigotti, T. (2017). Reciprocal relations between work-related authenticity and intrinsic motivation, work ability and depressivity: A two-wave study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 307. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eurostat (2020). Self-perceived long-standing limitations in usual activities due to health problem by sex, age and income quintile. hlth_silc_12. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/HLTH_SILC_12__custom_1744549/default/table?lang=en First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ferdman, B. M. (2014). The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations: Toward a systemic and inclusive framework. In B. M. FerdmanB. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (pp. 3 – 54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fuchs, J. (2013). Demografie und Fachkräftemangel. Die künftigen arbeitsmarktpolitischen Herausforderungen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, 56, 399 – 405. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haarhaus, B. (2016). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Kurzfragebogens zur Erfassung von allgemeiner und facettenspezifischer Arbeitszufriedenheit. Diagnostica, 62, 61 – 73. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Richter, N. F. & Hauff, S. (2017). Partial Least Squares Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. München: Franz Vahlen. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1), 2 – 24. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., Phetvaroon, K. & Li, J. (2020). Left out of the office “tribe”: The influence of workplace ostracism on employee work engagement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32, 2717 – 2735. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harand, J., Steinwede, J., Schröder, H. & Thiele, N. (2021). Repräsentativbefragung zur Teilhabe von Menschen mit Behinderungen. 4. Zwischenbericht (Forschungsbericht Nr. 571). Bonn: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. https://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Publikationen/Forschungsberichte/fb-571-repraesentativbefragung-teilhabe.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartung, F.-M., Sproesser, G. & Renner, B. (2015). Being and feeling liked by others: How social inclusion impacts health. Psychology & Health, 30, 1103 – 1115. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henseler, J. & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17 (1), 82 – 109. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2010). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 127 – 147). Oxford, NY: Oxford University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoch, J. E. (2007). Zum Einfluss struktureller, interaktionaler und teambasierter Führungstechniken auf den Teamerfolg. Doctoral dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel. Kiel, Germany. Verfügbar unter: https://macau.uni-kiel.de/receive/dissertation_diss_00002322 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Howard, M. C., Cogswell, J. E. & Smith, M. B. (2020). The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 577 – 596. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jansen, W. S., Otten, S. & van der Zee, K. I. (2016). Being different at work: How gender dissimilarity relates to social inclusion and absenteeism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 879 – 893. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jansen, W. S., Otten, S., van der Zee, K. I. & Jans, L. (2014). Inclusion: conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 370 – 385. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johns, G. & Miraglia, M. (2015). The reliability, validity, and accuracy of self-reported absenteeism from work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20 (1), 1 – 14. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jones, K. P. & King, E. B. (2014). Managing concealable stigmas at work: A review and multilevel model. Journal of Management, 40, 1466 – 1494. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jöns-Schnieder, K. & Riecken, A. (2017). Inklusionszufriedenheit von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigung auf dem allgemeinen Arbeitsmarkt. In A. RieckenK. Jöns-SchniederM. Eikötter (Hrsg.), Berufliche Inklusion. Forschungsergebnisse von Unternehmen und Beschäftigten im Spiegel der Praxis (Inklusive Bildung, S. 221 – 267). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Junker, N. M., Schyns, B., van Dick, R. & Scheurer, S. (2011). Die Bedeutung der Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung für Commitment, Arbeitszufriedenheit und Wohlbefinden unter Berücksichtigung der Geschlechterrollentheorie. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 55, 171 – 179. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kaye, H. S., Jans, L. H. & Jones, E. C. (2011). Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21, 526 – 536. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11 (4), 1 – 10. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koopmanschap, M., Burdorf, A. & Lötters, F. (2013). Work absenteeism and productivity loss at work. In P. LoiselJ. R. Anema (Eds.), Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management (pp. 31 – 42). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuntz, J. R. & Abbott, M. (2017). Authenticity at work: A moderated mediation analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25, 789 – 803. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leary, M. R. (2005). Varieties of interpersonal rejection. In K. D. WilliamsJ. P. ForgasW. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast. Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 35 – 51). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, M. R. & Cottrell, C. A. (2013). Evolutionary perspectives on interpersonal acceptance and rejection. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 9 – 19). New York, NY: Oxford University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A. & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013). Construct validity of the need to belong scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 610 – 624. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lyu, Y. & Zhu, H. (2019). The predictive effects of workplace ostracism on employee attitudes: A job embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1083 – 1095. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Markowetz, R. (2007). Inklusion und soziale Integration von Menschen mit Behinderungen. In G. Cloerkes (Ed.), Soziologie der Behinderten. Eine Einführung (Edition S, pp. 2007 – 2278). Heidelberg: Winter. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martinescu, E., Jansen, W. & Beersma, B. (2021). Negative gossip decreases targets’ organizational citizenship behavior by decreasing social inclusion. A multi-method approach. Group & Organization Management, 46, 463 – 497. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGonagle, A. K. & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2014). Chronic illness in the workplace: Stigma, identity threat and strain. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 30, 310 – 321. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Metin, U. B., Taris, T. W., Peeters, M. C. W., van Beek, I. & van den Bosch, R. (2016). Authenticity at work – A job-demands resources perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 483 – 499. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538 – 551. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P. & Maltin, E. R. (2010). Employee commitment and well-being: A critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 323 – 337. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61 (1), 20 – 52. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miraglia, M. & Johns, G. (2016). Going to work ill: A meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual-path model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 261 – 283. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Otten, S. & Jansen, W. S. (2015). Predictors and consequences of exclusion and inclusion at the culturally diverse workplace. In S. Otten (Eds.), Towards inclusive organizations. Determinants of successful diversity management at work (pp. 67 – 86). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: a cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 328 – 345. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pereira, D., Meier, L. L. & Elfering, A. (2013). Short-term effects of social exclusion at work and worries on sleep. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 29, 240 – 252. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickett, C. L. & Hess, Y. D. (2017). Social exclusion an the self. In K. D. WilliamsS. A. Nida (Eds.), Ostracism, exclusion, and rejection (pp. 113 – 129). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879 – 903. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Quinn, D. M. & Earnshaw, V. A. (2011). Understanding concealable stigmatized identities: The role of identity in psychological, physical, and behavioral outcomes. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 160 – 190. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 3.6.2) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from www.r-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ragins, B. R. (2008). Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review, 33, 194 – 215. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Black, W. W. & Rosenkrantz, D. E. (2017). Outness, concealment, and authenticity: Associations with LGB individuals’ psychological distress and well-being. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4 (1), 54 – 62. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS (Version 3.2.9) [Computer software]. Boenningstedt, Germany. Verfügbar unter: www.smartpls.com First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, S. & Schabram, K. (2017). Workplace ostracism. In K. D. WilliamsS. A. Nida (Eds.), Ostracism, exclusion, and rejection (pp. 224 – 239). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rohleder, N. (2016). Chronic Stress and Disease. In I. Berczi (Ed.), Insights to neuroimmune biology (pp. 201 – 2014). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Santuzzi, A. M., Waltz, P. R., Finkelstein, L. M. & Rupp, D. E. (2014). Invisible disabilities: unique challenges for employees and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 204 – 219. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O. & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM. Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69, 3998 – 4010. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scandura, T. A. & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428 – 436. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M. & Witte, H. de (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement. The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 577 – 591. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schrader, S. von, Malzer, V. & Bruyère, S. (2014). Perspectives on disability disclosure: the importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26, 237 – 255. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., Prentice, M. & Halusic, M. (2016). Do some people need autonomy more than others? Implicit dispositions toward autonomy moderate the effects of felt autonomy on well-being. Journal of Personality, 84 (1), 5 – 20. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shuo Jin, E. & Josephs, R. A. (2017). Acute und chronic physiological consequences of social rejection. In K. D. WilliamsS. A. Nida (Eds.), Ostracism, exclusion, and rejection (pp. 81 – 94). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sneddon, A., Mearns, K. & Flin, R. (2013). Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in offshore drilling crews. Safety Science, 56, 80 – 88. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A. & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 781 – 790. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2021). Bevölkerung und Demografie (Auszug aus dem Datenreport Nr. 1). Verfügbar unter https://www.destatis.de/DE/Service/Statistik-Campus/Datenreport/_inhalt.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stekhoven, D. J. & Bühlmann, P. (2012). MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics, 28 (1), 112 – 118. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227 – 242. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Wilder, L., Rammant, E., Clays, E., Devleesschauwer, B., Pauwels, N. & Smedt, D. de (2019). A comprehensive catalogue of EQ-5D scores in chronic disease: Results of a systematic review. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 28, 3153 – 3161. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vornholt, K., Villotti, P., Muschalla, B., Bauer, J., Colella, A., Zijlstra, F. et al. (2018). Disability and employment – overview and highlights. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (1), 40 – 55. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wansing, G. (2016). Was bedeutet Inklusion? Annäherungen an einen vielschichtigen Begriff. In T. DegenerE. Diehl (Hrsg.), Handbuch Behindertenrechtskonvention. Teilhabe als Menschenrecht – Inklusion als gesellschaftliche Aufgabe (S. 43 – 54). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, E. R. & Roberts, H. (2020). Reflecting on rumination: Consequences, causes, mechanisms and treatment of rumination. Behaviour research and therapy, 127, 103573. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization (2001). ICF. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Genf: Autor. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, C.-H., Liu, J., Kwan, H. K. & Lee, C. (2016). Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 362 – 378. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhang, J., Li, W., Ma, H. & Smith, A. P. (2020). Switch off totally or switch off strategically? The consequences of thinking about work on job performance. Psychological Reports, 33294120968080 https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120968080 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, L., Fan, C., Deng, Y., Lam, C. F., Hu, E. & Wang, L. (2019). Exploring the interpersonal determinants of job embeddedness and voluntary turnover: A conservation of resources perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 29, 413 – 432. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar