Abstract
Abstract. Explicit personality measures assess introspectively accessible self-descriptions. In contrast, implicit personality measures assess introspectively inaccessible processes that operate outside awareness. However, for both kinds of trait measures, the effect of the situation in which the assessment takes place should be as small as possible. The present study aims at quantifying possible systematic occasion-specific effects on implicit measures (Implicit Association Test) and explicit measures (self-report ratings) of extraversion and anxiety by means of a latent state-trait analysis. This analysis revealed that - as desired for personality assessment - all four measures capture mostly stable interindividual differences. Nevertheless, occasion-specific effects were also observed. These effects were (1) more pronounced for implicit than for explicit measures and (2) more pronounced for anxiety than for extraversion. Implications for the implicit assessment of personality traits are discussed.
References
Asendorpf, J.B. Banse, R. Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380– 393Banse, R. Seise, J. Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes toward homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145– 160Bosson, J.K. Swann, W.B. Pennebaker, J.W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631– 643Cattell, R.B. (1957). Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement . New York: World BookCosta, P.T. McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment ResourcesCunningham, W.A. Preacher, K.J. Banaji, M.R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163– 170Deinzer, R. Steyer, R. Eid, M. Notz, P. Schwenkmezger, P. Ostendorf, F. Neubauer, A. (1995). Situational effects in trait assessment: The FPI, NEOFFI, and EPI questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 9, 1– 23Draine, S.C. (2001). Inquisit (Version 1.32) [Computer software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond SoftwareEgloff, B. Schmukle, S.C. (2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441– 1455Egloff, B. Schmukle, S.C. (2003). Does social desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures?. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1697– 1706Egloff, B. Schmukle, S.C. Burns, L.R. Kohlmann, C.-W. Hock, M. (2003). Facets of dynamic positive affect: Differentiating joy, interest, and activation in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 528– 540Egloff, B. Schwerdtfeger, A. Schmukle, S.C. (2005). Temporal stability of the Implicit Association Test-Anxiety. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 82– 88Eid, M. Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662– 676Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709– 724Eysenck, H.J. Eysenck, M.W. (1985). Personality and individual differences . New York: PlenumEysenck, H.J. Eysenck, S.B.G. (1968). The Eysenck Personality Inventory . London: University of London PressGreenwald, A.G. Banaji, M.R. Rudman, L.A. Farnham, S.D. Nosek, B.A. Mellott, D.S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3– 25Greenwald, A.G. Farnham, S.D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022– 1038Greenwald, A.G. McGhee, D.E. Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480Greenwald, A.G. Nosek, B.A. Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216McClelland, D.C. Koestner, R. Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?. Psychological Review, 96, 690– 702Mierke, J. Klauer, K.C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180– 1192Muthén, L.K. Muthén, B.O. (2001). Mplus. User's guide . Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & MuthénNosek, B.A. Banaji, M.R. (2002). (At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. In R.K. Ohme & M. Jarymowicz (Eds.), Natura Automatyzmow (pp.49-56). Warszawa: WIP PAN & SWPSSchmitt, M. (2000). Mother-daughter attachment and family cohesion: Single and multi-construct latent state-trait models of current and retrospective perceptions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 115– 124Schmukle, S.C. Egloff, B. (2004). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?. European Journal of Personality, 18, 483– 494Schmukle, S.C. Egloff, B. Burns, L.R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 463– 475Schwarz, N. Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513– 523Spielberger, C.D. Gorsuch, R.L. Lushene, R.E. (1970). STAI manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory . Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists PressSteffens, M.C. Buchner, A. (2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50, 33– 48Steyer, R. Majcen, A.-M. Schwenkmezger, P. Buchner, A. (1989). A latent state-trait anxiety model and its application to determine consistency and specificity coefficients. Anxiety Research, 1, 281– 299Steyer, R. Schmitt, M. (1990). The effects of aggregation across and within occasions on consistency, specificity, and reliability. Methodika, 4, 58– 94Steyer, R. Schmitt, M. Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389– 408Strack, F. Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220– 247Wilson, T.D. Lindsley, S. Schooler, T.Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101– 126