Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Effect of Website Interactivity on Political Involvement

The Moderating Role of Political Cynicism

Published Online:October 04, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000200

Abstract

Abstract. This study examines the extent to which interactive communication on political websites affects various forms of citizens’ involvement in politics, and the moderating role of political cynicism in this relationship. Based on the outcomes of a laboratory experiment with a single-factor (interactivity: low vs. medium vs. high interactivity) between-subjects design, we found that interactive political websites have a positive effect on citizen involvement, and this effect is particularly present for websites with high levels of interactivity. We also demonstrate that interactivity effects are, to some extent, contingent on citizens’ political cynicism. For higher levels of political cynicism, deviations in the level of interactivity make less of a difference in their impact on political involvement.

References

  • Aarts, K. & Semetko, H. A. (2003). The divided electorate: Media use and political involvement. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 759–784. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00211 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Adriaansen, M. L., Van Praag, P. & De Vreese, C. H. (2010). Substance matters: How news content can reduce political cynicism. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(4), 433–457. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edq033 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Avery, J. M. (2009). Videomalaise or virtuous circle? The influence of the news media on political trust. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(4), 410–433. doi: 10.1177/1940161209336224 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Biocca, F., Harms, C. & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. doi: 10.1162/105474603322761270 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (2001). The new media and our political communication discontents: Democratizing cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 4(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/713768514 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bos, L., Van der Brug, W. & De Vreese, C. H. (2013). An experimental test of the impact of style and rhetoric on the perception of right-wing populist and mainstream party leaders. Acta Politica, 48(2), 192–208. doi: 10.1057/ap.2012.27 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/10584600902854363 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, P. R., Habegger, M., Harrington, R., Hoffman, L. H., Jones, P. E. & Lambe, J. L. (2016). Interactivity between candidates and citizens on a social networking site: Effects on perceptions and vote intentions. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3, 84–96. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2014.29 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bucy, E. P. & Tao, C. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9(3), 647–672. doi: 10.1080/15213260701283269 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cappella, J. N. & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Vreese, C. H. (2008). Political cynicism. The international encyclopedia of communication. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elenbaas, M. & De Vreese, C. H. (2008). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism and vote choice among young voters. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 550–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00399.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eveland, W. P. (2003). A “mix of attributes” approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fortin, D. R. & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387–396. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M. & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the US congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621. doi: 10.1002/asi.21344 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hirzalla, F., Van Zoonen, L. & De Ridder, J. (2011). Internet use and political participation: Reflections on the mobilization/normalization controversy. The Information Society, 27(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2011.534360 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, N. A. & Lilleker, D. G. (2009). Building an architecture of participation? Political parties and web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3–4), 232–250. doi: 10.1080/19331680903028438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jagers, J. & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. & Chua, W. S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 34–59. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelleher, T. & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenski, K. & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruikemeier, S. (2014a). Getting connected: The effects of online political communication on citizens’ political involvement. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruikemeier, S. (2014b). How political candidates use twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruikemeier, S., Van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R. & De Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464837 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, E. J. & Shin, S. Y. (2012). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians’ twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 515–535. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0228 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, E. J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N. & Vedel, T. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213. doi: 10.1177/0267323111416182 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liu, Y. & Shrum, L. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64. doi: 10.1177/019251219401500301 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lupia, A. & Philpot, T. S. (2005). Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults political interest. Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1122–1142. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00353.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McMillan, S. J. & Hwang, J. S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29–42.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4189224 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oh, J. & Sundar, S. S. (2015). How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 213–236. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12147 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pinkleton, B. E. & Austin, E. W. (2002). Exploring relationships among media use frequency, perceived media importance, and media satisfaction in political disaffection and efficacy. Mass Communication and Society, 5(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0502_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schuck, A. R. T., Boomgaarden, H. G. & De Vreese, C. H. (2013). Cynics all around? the impact of election news on political cynicism in comparative perspective. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 287–311. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schweitzer, E. J. (2008). Innovation or normalization in e-campaigning? A longitudinal content and structural analysis of German party websites in the 2002 and 2005 national elections. European Journal of Communication, 23(4), 449–470. doi: 10.1177/0267323108096994 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Song, I. & Bucy, E. P. (2007). Interactivity and political attitude formation: A mediation model of online information processing. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(2), 29–61. doi: 10.1080/19331680802076082 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spierings, N. & Jacobs, K. (2014). Getting personal? The impact of social media on preferential voting. Political Behavior, 36(1), 215–234. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, 20(5), 391–394. doi: 10.1080/01972240490508081 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S. & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity. Communication Research, 30(1), 30–59. doi: 10.1177/0093650202239025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tanis, M. (2003). Cues to identity in CMC: The impact on person perception and subsequent interaction outcomes. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1183–1194. doi: 10.1177/0002764207300041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trammell, K. D., Williams, A. P., Postelnicu, M. & Landreville, K. D. (2006). Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate web sites and blogs through text and technical features. Mass Communication & Society, 9(1), 21–44. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Utz, S. (2009). The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 221–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01438.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H. A. & Van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voorveld, H. A. M., Neijens, P. C. & Smit, E. G. (2011). The relation between actual and perceived interactivity: What makes the web sites of top global brands truly interactive? Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 77–92. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367400206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Warnick, B., Xenos, M., Endres, D. & Gastil, J. (2005). Effects of campaign-to-user and text-based interactivity in political candidate campaign web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00253.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, G. (2005). The mediating role of perceived interactivity in the effect of actual interactivity on attitude toward the website. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 29–39. doi: 10.1080/15252019.2005.10722099 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xenos, M. & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar