Replication of Experiments Evaluating Impact of Psychological Distance on Moral Judgment
(Eyal, Liberman & Trope, 2008; Gong & Medin, 2012)
Abstract
Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (2008) established that people judged moral transgressions more harshly and virtuous acts more positively when the acts were psychologically distant than close. In a series of conceptual and direct replications, Gong and Medin (2012) came to the opposite conclusion. Attempting to resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted four high-powered replication studies in which we varied temporal distance (Studies 1 and 3), social distance (Study 2) or construal level (Study 4), and registered their impact on moral judgment. We found no systematic effect of temporal distance, the effect of social distance consistent with Eyal et al., and the reversed effect of direct construal level manipulation, consistent with Gong and Medin. Possible explanations for the incompatible results are discussed.
References
(2009). Moral concerns are greater for temporally distant events and are moderated by value strength. Social Cognition, 27, 261–282.
(2013). Look at yourself! Visual perspective influences moral judgment by level of mental construal. Social Psychology, 44, 42–46.
(2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119.
(1988). Implications of cultural diversity for the universality claims of Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning. Human Development, 31, 44–59.
(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
(1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 215–229.
(2013). Minimal replicability, generalizability and scientific advances in psychological science. European Journal of Personality, 27, 121–122.
(2013). The new statistics: A how-to guide. Australian Psychologist, 48, 161–170.
(2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209.
(2014). A comment on Žeželj and Jokić replication. Commentaries and rejoinder to Žeželj and Jokić (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000206
(2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.
(2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 628–638.
(2014). Commentary on Žeželj and Jokić (2014). Commentaries and rejoinder to Žeželj and Jokić (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000206
(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
(1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.
(2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863–900.
(2012). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 475–480.
(1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18.
(2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.
(2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.
(2012). Levels of mental construal. In , Sage handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 229–250). London: Sage.
(1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202.
(2013). There is no such thing as replication, but we should do it anyway. European Journal of Personality, 27, 136–137.
(2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.
(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
(2011). Construal level theory. In , Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 118–135). London, UK: Sage.
(2001). Some cross-cultural evidence on ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 143–150.
(2011). Replication in prevention science. Prevention Science, 12, 103–117.
(2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20, 52–58.
(2014). A rejoinder to comments by Eyal, Liberman & Trope and Gong & Medin. Commentaries and rejoinder to Zezelj and Jokic (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000206
