Skip to main content
Original Article

The Effects of Social Distance and Gender on Moral Decisions and Judgments

A Reanalysis, Replication, and Extension of Singer et al. (2019)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000537

Abstract: In morality, social distance should influence judgments and decisions. Singer et al.’s (2019) Everyday Moral Conflict Situations scale was created to assess altruistic versus egoistic choices in everyday moral contexts depending on social distance manipulated at the item level. Via a reanalysis of their data, we found an unreported interaction effect between social distance and gender on behavioral choices. We conducted a conceptual replication (Part 1) and extended previous research by empirically assessing the link between altruism and morality (Part 2). This pre-registered study (N = 299) confirmed the gender-by-social distance interaction, with a stronger social distance effect for males and for egoistic behaviors. Furthermore, behavioral choices were linked to moral judgments of wrongness. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

References

  • Almaatouq, A., Griffiths, T. L., Suchow, J. W., Whiting, M. E., Evans, J., & Watts, D. J. (2022). Beyond playing 20 questions with nature: Integrative experiment design in the social and behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–55. 10.1017/S0140525X22002874 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, V., & Beauchamp, M. H. (Eds.), (2012) Developmental social neuroscience and childhood brain insult: Theory and practice. Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312. 10.1162/003355301556419 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A. (2004). Aggression and moral development: Integrating social information processing and moral domain models. Child Development, 75(4), 987–1002. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00720.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Atari, M., Lai, M. H. C., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1937). 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., García, A. M., Cetkovich, M., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS ONE, 12(6), Article e0179336. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179336 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bago, B., Kovacs, M., Protzko, J., Nagy, T., Kekecs, Z., Palfi, B., Adamkovic, M., Adamus, S., Albalooshi, S., Albayrak-Aydemir, N., Alfian, I. N., Alper, S., Alvarez-Solas, S., Alves, S. G., Amaya, S., Andresen, P. K., Anjum, G., Ansari, D., Arriaga, P., … Aczel, B. (2022). Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(6), 880–895. 10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Espinosa, M. P., Jiménez, N., Kovářík, J., & Ponti, G. (2010). Altruism and social integration. Games and Economic Behavior, 69(2), 249–257. 10.1016/j.geb.2009.10.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., & Southwood, N. (2013). Moral and social norms. In G. BrennanL. ErikssonR. E. GoodinN. Southwood (Eds.), Explaining norms (pp. 57–90). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.003.0004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carpendale, J. I. M. (2000). Kohlberg and Piaget on stages and moral reasoning. Developmental Review, 20(2), 181–205. 10.1006/drev.1999.0500 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112(2), 281–299. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dewberry, C., Juanchich, M., & Narendran, S. (2013). Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 783–788. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. 10.1177/0146167200262001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1979). Relationship of prosocial moral reasoning to altruism, political liberalism, and intelligence. Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 87–89. 10.1037/h0078081 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275–298. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., & Barreto, M. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160–193. 10.1080/10463283.2013.841490 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209. 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friesdorf, R., Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696–713. 10.1177/0146167215575731 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garrigan, B., Adlam, A. L. R., & Langdon, P. E. (2018). Moral decision-making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework. Developmental Review, 49, 80–100. 10.1016/j.dr.2018.06.00 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gert, B., & Gert, J. (2020). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/morality-definition/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, J. C. (2019). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J., Meindl, P., Beall, E., Johnson, K. M., & Zhang, L. (2016). Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 125–130. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. 10.1126/science.1062872 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guglielmo, S. (2015). Moral judgment as information processing: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article e01637. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01637 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q., & Tracer, D. (2005). Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795–815. 10.1017/S0140525X05000142 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726. 10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, B. A. (2021). A review of social discounting: The impact of social distance on altruism. The Psychological Record. 72, 511–515. 10.1007/s40732-021-00488-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kagan, J. (2008). Morality and its development. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 297–312). MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kekes, J. (1981). Morality and altruism. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 15(4), 265–278. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). Stages of moral development as a basis for moral education. In C. M. BeckB. S. CrittendenE. Sullivan (Éds.), Moral education (pp. 23–92). University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442656758-004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kraut, R. (2020). Altruism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/altruism/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lamond, D., & Thompson, C. (2000). Intuition and analysis in decision making and choice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 411–414. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00411.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieberman, D., & Linke, L. (2007). The effect of social category on third party punishment. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2). 10.1177/147470490700500203 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Linke, L. H. (2012). Social closeness and decision making: Moral, attributive and emotional reactions to third party transgressions. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 31(3), 291–312. 10.1007/s12144-012-9146-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256–1269. 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malle, B. F. (2021). Moral judgments. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 293–318. 10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McManus, R. M., Kleiman-Weiner, M., & Young, L. (2020). What we owe to family: The impact of special obligations on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 31(3), 227–242. 10.1177/0956797619900321 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Mott, M. L., & Asher, B. (2012). Virtual morality: Emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional “trolley problem”. Emotion, 12(2), 364–370. 10.1037/a0025561 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Gorman, R., Wilson, D. S., & Miller, R. R. (2005). Altruistic punishing and helping differ in sensitivity to relatedness, friendship, and future interactions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, J. A., & DeNisi, A. S. (1983). Attribution theory and strategic decision making: An application to coalition formation. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 119–128. 10.5465/256138 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Singer, N., Binapfl, J., Sommer, M., Wüst, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2021). Everyday moral decision-making after acute stress exposure: Do social closeness and timing matter? Stress, 24(4), 468–473. 10.1080/10253890.2020.1846029. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singer, N., Kreuzpointner, L., Sommer, M., Wüst, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2019). Decision-making in everyday moral conflict situations: Development and validation of a new measure. PLoS ONE, 14(4), Article e0214747. 10.1371/journal.pone.0214747 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singer, N., Sommer, M., Wüst, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2021). Effects of gender and personality on everyday moral decision-making after acute stress exposure. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 124, Article 105084. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.105084 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strombach, T., Jin, J., Weber, B., Kenning, P., Shen, Q., Ma, Q., & Kalenscher, T. (2014). Charity begins at home: Cultural differences in social discounting and generosity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 235–245. 10.1002/bdm.1802 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szczepaniak, Z., Quinton, J.-C., Gaboriaud, A., & Smeding (2023). Replication and Extension Singer et al. (2019, 2021a, 2021b) [Data, analyses]. https://osf.io/j49k2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Mancini, J., & Wicker, B. (2013). Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article e250. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social-functionalist metaphors for judgment and choice: The intuitive politician, theologian, and prosecutor. Psychological Review, 109(3), 451–471. 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.451 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 143–173. 10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.143 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yates, J. F., & de Oliveira, S. (2016). Culture and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 106–118. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yeates, K. O., Bigler, E. D., Gerhardt, C. A., Rubin, K. H., Stancin, T., Taylor, H. G., & Vannatta, K. (2012). Theoretical approaches to understanding social function in childhood brain insults: Toward the integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. In V. AndersonM. H. Beauchamp (Eds.), Developmental social neuroscience and childhood brain insult: Theory and practice (pp. 207–230). The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., Maloo, S., Degannes, J., Dobo, L., Ditshotlo, P., & Legall, G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(4), 491–498. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Žeželj, I. L., & Jokić, B. R. (2014). Replication of experiments evaluating impact of psychological distance on moral judgment: (Eyal, Liberman & Trope, 2008; Gong & Medin, 2012). Social Psychology, 45(3), 223–231. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000188 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Zhan, Y., Xiao, X., Li, J., Liu, L., Chen, J., Fan, W., & Zhong, Y. (2018). Interpersonal relationship modulates the behavioral and neural responses during moral decision-making. Neuroscience Letters, 672, 15–21. 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.039 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar