Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Effects of Counterfactual Attacks on the Morality and Leadership of Different Professionals

Published Online:June 04, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000338

Abstract

Abstract. Past research has offered contrasting results regarding the effects of attacks on social judgments. In three experiments, we investigated the effects of counterfactual (“If only…”) and non-counterfactual attacks on the morality versus leadership of politicians versus entrepreneurs. First, participants rated morality as the most desirable, but least typical dimension of politicians, and leadership as the most desirable and most typical dimension of entrepreneurs (Study 1). Then, counterfactual attacks led to poorer evaluation of the attacked target and better evaluation of the attacking source as compared to non-counterfactual attacks, especially when counterfactuals were focused on the most desirable dimension for the professional category of the attacked target (Study 2). Similar results emerged when the typicality of the attacked dimension was manipulated (Study 3). Discussion focuses on the higher success of attacks on desirable personality dimensions and of counterfactual attacks as compared to other attacks.

References

  • Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A. & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C. & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.575 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D., Buckingham, J., Zell, E. & Davis, T. (2008). Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321594 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asbrock, F. (2010). Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000011 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Bryson, L. & Mullett, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bertolotti, M., Catellani, P., Douglas, K. M. & Sutton, R. M. (2013). The “Big Two” in political communication: The effects of attacking and defending politicians’ leadership and morality in two European countries. Social Psychology, 44, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000141 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S. & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Branscombe, N. R., Crosby, P. & Weir, J. A. (1993). Social inferences concerning male and female homeowners who use a gun to shoot an intruder. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1993)19:2<113::AID-AB2480190204>3.0.CO;2-B First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Branscombe, N. R. & Weir, J. A. (1992). Resistance as stereotype-inconsistency: Consequences for judgments of rape victims. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1992.11.1.80 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cariani, F. & Rips, L. J. (2017). Conditionals, context, and the suppression effect. Cognitive Science, 41, 540–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12336 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carraro, L., Gawronski, B. & Castelli, L. (2010). Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person-based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609x468042 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B. & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000176 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Castelli, L., Carraro, L., Ghitti, C. & Pastore, M. (2009). The effects of perceived competence and sociability on electoral outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1152–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Catellani, P., Alberici, A. I. & Milesi, P. (2004). Counterfactual thinking and stereotypes: The nonconformity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Catellani, P. & Bertolotti, M. (2013). Political communication, social cognitive processes, and voters’ judgments. In J. ForgasO. VinczeE. J. LaszloEds., Social cognition and communication (pp. 283–296). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Catellani, P. & Bertolotti, M. (2014a). The effects of counterfactual defences on social judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1995 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Catellani, P. & Bertolotti, M. (2014b). The effects of counterfactual attacks on social judgments. Social Psychology, 45, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1995 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Catellani, P. & Bertolotti, M. (2015). The perception of politicians’ morality: Attacks and defences. In J. P. ForgasK. FiedlerW. Crano (Eds.). Social psychology and politics (pp. 112–128). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Catellani, P. & Covelli, V. (2013). The strategic use of counterfactual communication in politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13495548 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Catellani, P. & Quadrio, A. (1991). Ideal and real in the representation of politics. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 4, 231–255. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cislak, A. (2013). Effects of power on social perception. Social Psychology, 44, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000139 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cislak, A. & Wojciszke, B. (2006). The role of self-interest and competence in attitudes toward politicians. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 4, 203–212. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cislak, A. & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.554 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L. & Li, N. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cuddy, A., Fiske, S. & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(07)00002-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, C. G. & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Counterfactual thinking and coping with traumatic life events. In N. J. RoeseJ. M. OlsonEds., What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 353–374). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M. & Sutton, R. M. (2010). By their words ye shall know them: Language abstraction and the likeability of describers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.634 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Epstude, K. & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Epstude, K. & Roese, N. J. (2011). When goal pursuit fails. Social Psychology, 42, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000039 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. & Mata, A. (2013). The art of exerting verbal influence through powerful lexical stimuli. In J. P. ForgasJ. LaszloO. VinczeEds., Social cognition and communication (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funk, C. L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01498658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gavanski, I. & Wells, G. L. (1989). Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90025-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P. & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(91)90007-m First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldinger, S. D., Kleider, H. M., Azuma, T. & Beike, D. R. (2003). “Blaming the victim” under memory load. Psychological Science, 14, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01423 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In A. P. MartinichEd., Philosophy of language (pp. 165–175). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haddock, G. & Zanna, M. (1997). Impact of negative advertising on evaluations of political candidates: The 1993 Canadian federal election. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1207/15324839751037066 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hegarty, P. & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.723 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J. (2005). Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 301–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500436040 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J., Robson, E., Smith, J., Esposo, S. & Sutton, R. M. (2008). Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism. Human Communication Research, 34, 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00314.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., Woelki, J., Hanke, S. & Dotsch, R. (2013). Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00386 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johns, R. & Shepard, M. (2007). Gender, candidate image and electoral preference. British Journal of Political International Relations, 9, 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2008.8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V. Y. & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. KahnemanE. SlovicA. TverskyEds., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B. & Fiske, S. T. (2012). The innuendo effect: Hearing the positive but inferring the negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kervyn, N., Dolderer, M., Mahieu, T. & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2010). Atypicality and the two fundamental dimensions: Applying the negativity effect on warmth to group perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.638 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, P. H., Dirks, K., Cooper, C. & Ferrin, D. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C., Jacobsen, T. & Migulla, G. (1995). Counterfactual processing: Test of an hierarchical correspondence model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250508 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L. & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics, 69, 1176–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N. & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., Minescu, A., Poppe, E. & Hagendoorn, L. (2008). Generality and specificity in stereotypes of out-group power and benevolence: Views of Chechens and Jews in the Russian federation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1165–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.577 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maak, T., Pless, N. M. & Voegtlin, C. (2016). Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro-foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 463–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12195 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mandel, D. R.Hilton, D. J.Catellani, P. (Eds.). (2005). The psychology of counterfactual thinking. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Markman, K. D. & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). “I couldn’t have known”: Accountability, foreseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164499 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGraw, K. M. (2003). Political impressions: Formation and management. In D. O. SearsL. HuddyR. JervisEds., Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 394–432). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M. & Jones, J. M. (2002). The pandering politicians of suspicious minds. Journal of Politics, 64, 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00130 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meeks, L. (2012). Is she “man enough”? Women candidates, executive political offices, and news coverage. Journal of Communication, 62, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mollaret, P. & Miraucourt, D. (2016). Is job performance independent from career success? A conceptual distinction between competence and agency. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57, 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12329 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nario-Redmond, M. & Branscombe, N. (1996). It could have been better or it might have been worse: Implications for blame assignment in rape cases. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1803_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nichols, A. L. & Cottrell, C. A. (2014). What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pagliaro, S., Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., D’Angelo, M. & Ellemers, N. (2013). Initial impressions determine behaviours: Morality predicts the willingness to help newcomers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1508-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roese, N. J. & Epstude, K. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: New evidence, new challenges, new insights. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roese, N. J. & Sande, G. N. (1993). Backlash effect in attack politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 632–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01106.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schlenker, B. R. & Pontari, B. A. (2000). The strategic control of information: Impression management and self-presentation in daily life. In A. TesserR. B. FelsonJ. M. SulsEds., Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 199–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scholer, A. A. & Higgins, E. T. (2008). People as resources: Exploring the functionality of warm and cold. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.509 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tal-Or, N., Boninger, D. S., Poran, A. & Gleicher, F. (2004). Counterfactual thinking as a mechanism in narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 30, 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00734.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thaler, V. (2012). Mitigation as modification of illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.3.301 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walton, D. (1993). The speech act of presumption. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1, 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.1.1.08wal First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wells, G. L. & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.161 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wells, G. L., Taylor, B. R. & Turtle, J. W. (1987). The undoing of scenarios. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.421 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500229619 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wong, E. M. (2010). It could have been better: The effects of counterfactual communication on impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.719 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zeelenberg, M., Van den Bos, K., Van Dijk, E. & Pieters, R. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.314 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar