Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024//0044-3514.34.2.79

Zusammenfassung: Es wird ein Experiment dargestellt zu der Frage, ob die Aktivierung einer Eigenschaftskategorie und die hieraus resultierende Erwartung über eine Person (genannt “Stimulusperson”) zu einem spezifischen nachfolgenden Verhalten gegenüber dieser Person führt. 60 Probanden wurden in Dyaden zusammengestellt, wobei ein Proband per Zufall der Rolle einer Stimulusperson zugeordnet wurde. Jede Stimulusperson interagierte nacheinander mit drei verschiedenen Versuchspersonen, deren kategoriale Erwartung zu der Stimulusperson durch Vorgabe charakteristischer Merkmale der Kategorie “extravertiert” bzw. “introvertiert” variiert wurde. In einer Kontrollbedingung erfolgte keine Kategorienaktivierung. Zwei Faktoren waren ausschlaggebend für das Verhalten der Versuchspersonen: (a) der spezifische Inhalt der aktivierten Kategorie und (b) die Konsistenz der Erwartung mit dem Verhalten der Stimulusperson. Die Bedeutung der Befunde für aktuelle Modelle der Kognitions-Verhaltens-Verknüpfung wird diskutiert.


The Cognition-Behavior Link: Effects of Activated Trait Categories on Social Behavior

Summary: Current models of the social cognition-behavior link assume that activating a trait category induces an expectancy about a target person and a specific behavior towards this person. 60 subjects participated in an experiment where 15 subjects were randomly assigned to the role of a target person. Each target interacted consecutively with three subjects whose category-dependent expectancy towards the target was varied. To activate different categories, subjects received attributes of a typical “extravert”, a typical “introvert” or no information in the control condition. The analysis of the interaction data confirmed the hypothesis. Subjects' behavior was significantly influenced by the prior activated category where two factors affected the quality of the behavior: (a) the content of the category and (b) the consistency between subjects' expectancy and targets' behavior. Theoretical implications of the results are discussed.

References

  • Baldwin, M. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information.. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461– 484 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baldwin, M.W. (1995). Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships.. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 547– 552 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bales, R.F. , Cohen, S.P. (1982). SYMLOG - Ein System für die mehrstufige Beobachtung von Gruppen. . Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J.A. , Chen, M. , Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230– 244 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, D. , Rosenthal, R. (1982). Gender and nonverbal decoding skill as determinants of interpersonal expectancy effects.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 75– 87 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dijksterhuis, A. , Bargh, J.A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception and social behavior.. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.33, pp.1-40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eckes, T. (1997). Geschlechterstereotypen. Frau und Mann in sozialpsychologischer Sicht. . Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S.T. , Neuberg, S.L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation.. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.23, pp.1-74). New York: Academic Press. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, P.M. , Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition.. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp.361-399). New York: Guilford. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hilton, J.L. , Darley, J.M. (1985). Constructing others: A limit on the effect.. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 1– 18 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ickes, W. (1983). A basic paradigm for the study of unstructured dyadic interaction.. In H. Reis (Ed.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science (pp.5-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, E.E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. . New York: W.H. Freeman. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jussim, L. , Eccles, J. , Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy.. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.28, pp.281-388). San Diego: Academic Press. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D.A. (1996). The design and analysis of social-interaction research.. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 59– 86 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D.A. , La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339– 348 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D.T. , Turnbull, W. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes.. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 233– 256 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Orford, J. (1986). The rules of interpersonal complementarity: Does hostility beget hostility and dominance, submission?. Psychological Review, 93, 365– 377 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oswald, M.E. (1994). Hypothesentesten: Suche und Verarbeitung hypothesenkonformer und hypothesenkonträrer Informationen.. In W. Hell, K. Fiedler & G. Gigerenzer (Hrsg.), Kognitive Täuschungen (S.189-211). Heidelberg: Spektrum. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, D.J. , Blankmeyer, B.L. (1983). Prototype salience and implicit personality theories.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 712– 722 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Semin, G.R. , Rosch, E. (1981). Activation of bipolar prototypes in attribute inferences.. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 472– 484 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, M. (1992). Motivational foundations of behavioral confirmation.. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.25, pp.67-114). New York: Academic Press. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, M. , Haugen, J.A. (1994). Why does behavioral confirmation occur? A functional perspective on the role of the perceiver.. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 218– 246 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strong, S.R. , Hills, H.I. , Kilmartin, C.T. , DeVries, H. , Lanier, K. , Nelson, B.N. , Strickland, D. , Meyer, C.W. (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomlementarity.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 798– 810 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swann, W.B. , Ely, R.J. (1984). A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1287– 1302 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willi, J. (1973). Der gemeinsame Rorschach-Versuch. Diagnostik von Paar- und Gruppenbeziehungen. . Bern: Huber. . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar