Abstract
Summary: With German and Chinese subjects, memory span for simple geometrical shapes and random shapes was established. Half of the subjects additionally learned verbal descriptions for the random shapes prior to the trials in which memory span was measured. Throughout all experimental conditions, the Chinese subjects achieved higher memory span scores than the German subjects where simple geometrical shapes were concerned, however, this was not the case where random shapes had to be reproduced. In addition the articulation times for the verbal descriptions of the figures used were measured. The articulation times for the verbal descriptions of both the simple geometrical shapes and the random shapes were shorter in Chinese than they were in German. The appearance of a language-specific effect on memory in the case of simple geometrical shapes and the non-appearance of such an effect in the case of random shapes are discussed within the framework of Baddeley's working memory model.
Literatur
(1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company
(1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (revised ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press
(1974). Working memory. In: Bower, G.A. (Ed.): The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press
(1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–585
(1997). Digit span and articulatory suppression: A cross-linguistic comparison. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 89–96
(1980). A bilingual word-length effect: Implications for intelligence testing and the relative ease of mental calculation in Welsh and English. British Jornal of Psychology, 71, 43–52
(1974). China Handbuch. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag
(1987). Grundlagen einer Versuchsplanung zur Prüfung empirischer Hypothesen in der Psychologie. In: Lüer, G. (Ed.): Allgemeine Experimentelle Psychologie (pp. 43-264). Stuttgart: G. Fischer
(1979). Forward and backward digit span in the languages of the bilingual. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 135, 263–268
(1984). Experiments on digit spans in the Chinese and English languages. In: Kao, H.S.R., Hoosain, R. (Eds.): Psychological studies of the Chinese language (pp. 23-38). Hong Kong: The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong
(1988). Language differences, working memory, and mathematical ability. In: Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., Sykes, R. N. (Eds.): Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 2: Clinical and educational implications (pp. 512-517). Chichester: Wiley
(1997). Einfluss von Sprache auf Verarbeitungsprozesse im Kurzzeitgedächtnis - eine vergleichende Untersuchung mit deutschen und chinesischen Probanden. In: Lüer, G., Lass, U. (Eds.): Erinnern und Behalten. Wege zur Erforschung des menschlichen Gedächtnisses, (pp. 244-268). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
(2000). Kurzzeitgedächtnisleistungen deutscher und chinesischer Probanden mit verbalen und figuralen Items: zur Funktion von Phonologischer Schleife und visuell-räumlichen Notizblock. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 47, 77–88
(1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd
(1998). Memory span in German and Chinese: Evidence for the phonological loop. European Psychologist, 3, 102–112
(1988). Training and Stroop-like interferences: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126–135
(1986). Digit span, reading rate, and linguistic relativity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 739–751
(1986). Short-term memory capacity: Magic number or magic spell?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 419–425
(1986). Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store. Cognition, 23, 1–20
(1959). The association value of random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 147–154
(1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 13, 193–201