Abstract
Two conditions which both disrupt faces processing, inversion and the transformation of the face into an edge-based line drawing, have each been explained at least partially in terms of a disruption of configural information. Five experiments are reported in which the combined effects of the two manipulations were investigated, to find out how the combination of both affects face processing. Moreover, two different tasks were used: sequential matching of person identity and free identification. The general pattern of result revealed that in both tasks effects of both manipulations are rather additive and thus it is concluded that both manipulations are disruptive through different sorts of information processing. It is discussed how at least two different kinds of configural information are involved in face processing. The comparison of the two tasks, identification and sequential matching, indicates that identification is the more critical condition as it cannot be based on inferences that are probably due to short-term representations of critical features - although both tasks reveal similar results.
References
1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281– 316.
(1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305– 327.
(1992). The importance of “mass” in line-drawings of faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 7 619– 628.
(1993). Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces. Perception, 22, 131– 152.
(1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, A 119– 141.
(1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception, 23, 803– 822.
(1994). Recognizing Objects and Faces. Visual Cognition, 1, 141– 180.
(1981). Lésions cérébrales unilaterales et trouble de perception des visages: specificité du déficit?. Acta Neurological Belgica, 81, 321– 332.
(1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?. Visual Cognition, 1, 2/3 253– 274.
(1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 2 180– 187.
(1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431– 439.
(1992). Categorical perception of expressions. Cognition, 44, 3 227– 240.
(1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47– 59.
(1986). Exploring recognition with interchanged facial features. Perception, 15, 235– 247.
(1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images. Perception, 15, 595– 602.
(1996). Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgement in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 662– 675.
(1996a). Linienzeichnungen von Gesichtern: Verfremdung im Gesichtsmodul. Bern: Huber.
(1996b). Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing. Perception, 25, 355– 366.
(1999). Matching person identity from facial line drawings. Perception, 28, 1171– 1175.
(1998). Local and relational aspects of facial distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449– 473.
(2000). When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513– 536.
(1997). Matching 1.2.: A Macintosh software tool for the presentation of photographic stimuli. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 56, 3 193– 194.
(1994). Identification of emotional meaning in line drawings of faces. Arbeitsbericht (Berichte aus der Fakultät für Psychologie), Nr. 44/1944. Bochum.
(1985). Visual communication at very low data rates. Proceedings of the IEEE, 73, 795– 812.
(1972). Why are faces hard to recognise in photographic negative?. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 425– 426.
(1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17, 43– 63.
(1993). What's lost in inverted faces?. Cognition, 47, 25– 57.
(1981). Studies of cue saliency. In: Davies, G., Ellis, H. & Shepherd, J. (Eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces. London: Academic Press.
(1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34– 50.
(1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225– 245.
(1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In: R. L. Goldstone, D. L. Medin, & P. Schyns, (Eds.). Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Mechanism of Perceptual Learning. Academic Press.
(1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471– 491.
(1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141– 145.
(1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737– 746.
(1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747– 759.
(