Abstract
Abstract. Although endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) presents a delicate alternative treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with lower perioperative mortality, its long-term efficacy remains a matter of concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the currently reported mortality evidence after EVAR and to examine the possible effect of aneurysm status and the study period on mortality rates. The PubMed and Cochrane bibliographical databases were thoroughly searched for studies reporting on more than 1 000 patients with non-ruptured or ruptured infrarenal AAA, treated with EVAR from August 1991 to September 2016. A total of 10 910 titles/abstracts were retrieved and 121 studies were deemed relevant. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and reported on 354 500 patients with a mean age of 74.6 years. Almost all of the studies referred to elective EVAR and the mean aneurysm size was 5.58 cm. The most common early complication for elective EVAR was perioperative bleeding (1.9 %), whereas hospital-acquired pneumonia was a major concern in urgent EVAR (28.5 %). Conversion rate to open surgery was 1.2 %. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 4.84 % (1.7 % for non- ruptured aneurysms, 33.8 % for ruptured aneurysms).The overall all-cause late mortality in a mean follow-up period of 23.8 months was 19.1 %. The aneurysm-related late mortality rate was 3.4 %. With respect to the time period of patient enrollment, studies reporting on patients recruited before 2006 were found to face more secondary complications and higher late mortality rates than patients enrolled after 2005.The endovascular treatment of large and anatomically suitable infrarenal AAA in selected patients remains a safe alternative to open repair. Our findings demonstrate that newer studies show better long-term outcomes than the older ones, proposing a possible improvement of EVAR techniques and perioperative care and providing encouraging evidence for a wider application of EVAR.
Literature
[A case of distant transfemoral endoprosthesis of the thoracic artery using a self-fixing synthetic prosthesis in traumatic aneurysm]. Grudn Khir. 1988(6):84–6.
.Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5(6):491–9.
.Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pathogenesis and implications for management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(12):2605–13.
.Images in clinical medicine. Transfemoral repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(26):1751.
.Influence of study design on reported mortality and morbidity rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 1998;85(12):1624–30.
.Placement of endovascular stented grafts via remote access sites: a new approach to the treatment of failed aortoiliofemoral reconstructions. Ann Vasc Surg. 1995;9(1):1–8.
The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(9):1–218.
.Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1881–9.
A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(5):1167–73e1.
Causes of late mortality after endovascular and open surgical repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(6):1340–7e1.
.2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873–926.
EVAR trial participants . Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2179–86.Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1535–42.
Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1437–44.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
The impact of stent graft evolution on the results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(6):1518–27.
Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with open surgical repair in high-risk patients: results from the Swedish Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(6):1382–8.
.Sex differences in 30-day and 5-year outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the EUROSTAR study. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1):42–9e1.
.Thirty-day outcome and quality of life after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians based on the Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry (ENGAGE). J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(1):27–35.
.Long-term single institution comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair and open aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(6):1592–7.
Does Palmaz XL stent deployment for type 1 endoleak during elective or emergency endovascular aneurysm repair predict poor outcome? A multivariate analysis of 1470 patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27(4):401–11.
Ten-year results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from a large multicenter registry. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(2):324–32.
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(3):575–82.
Thresholds for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in England and the United States. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2051–9.
The comparative effectiveness of surgeons over interventionalists in endovascular repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):476–82.
.Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(6):1271–9e1.
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with concomitant common iliac artery aneurysm: outcome analysis of the EUROSTAR Experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15(1):12–22.
.Use of abdominal aortic endovascular prostheses in France from 1999 to 2001. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(6):1273–81.
Stent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(6):1264–72.
.Causes and implications of readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):595–605.
Elective endovascular aneurysm repair in the elderly: trends and outcomes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(4):798–807.
.Impact of hospital-acquired infection on long-term outcomes after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(4):823–30.
.Outcome and quality of life after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):308–17.
Outcomes for symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(2):297–305.
Clinical presentation, comorbidities, and age but not female gender predict survival after endovascular re-pair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(4):853–61e2.
Lifeline Registry of EPC . Lifeline registry of endovascular aneurysm repair: long-term primary outcome measures. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(1):1–10.Effect of stentgraft model on aneurysm shrinkage in 1 450 endovascular aortic repairs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(2):192–200.
Optimal selection of patients for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on life expectancy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(3):589–95.
Thresholds for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in England and the United States. N Engl J Med 2016;21:375.
.Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843–8.
.Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians is associated with higher mortality compared with nonoctogenarians. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(4):956–65e1.
.Fenestrated endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with increased morbidity but comparable mortality with infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(3):604–10.
Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011;123(24):2848–55.
Late Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Previous Endovascular Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(5):734–44.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013;100(7):863–72.
.Effect of lutein and antioxidant supplementation on VEGF expression, MMP-2 activity, and ultrastructural alterations in apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:213505.
.Late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):52–7.
.Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(10):1071–80.
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;1:CD004178.
.Comparison of long-term survival after open vs endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1621–8.
.Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):166–78.
Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2366–74.
.Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term survival After Elective Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair 1969–2011: 5 Year Survival Remains Poor Despite Advances in Medical Care and Treatment Strategies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(3):320–30.