“Progressive” elastic compression stockings as future standard
Comment on Couzan et al., p. 413–417
References
1 . Medizinische Kompressionsstrümpfe, DIN-Norm, RAL-GZ 387\1, Januar 2008; 4–15.
2 . A systematic review of compression hosiery for uncomplicated varicose veins. Phlebology. 2009;24(Suppl 1):13–33.
3 . Efficacy of ready-made tubular compression device versus short-stretch compression bandages in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wounds. 2004;16:313–20.
4 Efficacy and tolerability of an ulcer compression stocking for therapy of chronic venous ulcer compared with a below-knee compression bandage: results from a prospective, randomized multicentre trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(10):1613–24.
5 Prevention of recurrence of venous ulceration: Randomized controlled trial of class 2 and class 3 elastic compression. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:803–808.
6 A randomized double-blind trial of upward progressive versus degressive compressive stockings in patients with moderate to severe chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:1344–50.
7 . Compression stockings with a negative pressure gradient have a more pronounced effect on venous pumping function than graduated elastic compression stockings. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42:261–6.
8 . High tolerance of progressive elastic compression in peripheral arterial disease. Vasa. 2019;48(5):XX–XX.
9 . Interface pressure and venous drainage of two compression stocking types in healthy volunteers and in patients with hemodynamic disturbances of the legs. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2015;61:175–83.