Abstract
Summary. The study objective was to evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT) to identify technical complications intra-operatively during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Frequency of complications seen by CT and their sequelae was compared with conventional completion angiography. Methods: We performed a systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We considered studies reporting on the effectiveness of intra-operative CT during EVAR. Results: Our literature search yielded six studies that met our criteria for inclusion. In general, these showed intra-operative CT to be superior to completion angiogram at detecting intra-operative complications during EVAR. Despite concerns regarding irradiation, the use of intra-operative CT was found to expose patients to an overall lower radiation dose, since post-operative CT angiograms were no longer required. Moreover, no adverse effect on renal function has been demonstrated as a result of the increased intra-operative contrast usage when CT is used. Conclusions: The current body of evidence suggests that intra-operative CT is superior to completion angiography at detecting clinically important EVAR complications and incurs a lower total radiation dose with no added risk of contrast-induced renal impairment. Further research directly comparing the two modalities in the same cohort is required to determine sensitivity for individual complications.
References
1 Outcome after open and endovascular repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms in matched cohorts using propensity score modeling. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(2):304–311.e2.
2 . Complex EVAR is associated with higher perioperative mortality but not late-mortality compared to infrarenal EVAR amongst octogenarians. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(3):e47.
3 Mortality and reintervention following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(6):1676–1683.e1.
4 . Update on New Tools for Three-dimensional Navigation in Endovascular Procedures Based on a Presentation at the 2013 VEITH Symposium, November 19–23, 2013 (New York, NY, USA). Aorta (Stamford). 2014;2(6):279–85.
5 Handbook for DTA Reviews. [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 27]. Available from: /sdt/handbook-dta-reviews
6 PRISMA [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/
7 OCEBM Levels of Evidence [Internet]. CEBM. 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/2016/05/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/
8 Benefits of completion 3D angiography associated with contrast enhanced ultrasound to assess technical success after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(5):541–8.
9 . Intra-operative cone beam computed tomography can help avoid reinterventions and reduce CT follow up after infrarenal EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(4):390–5.
10 . Intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography to assess technical success during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(3):577–84.
11 . Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endografting. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(3):583–90.
12 . Intra-operative DynaCT improves technical success of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(2):288–95.
13 Impact of onlay fusion and cone beam computed tomography on radiation exposure and technical assessment of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(4):1045–1058.e3.
14 . Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23(4):583–92.
