Regional variation of lower limb major amputations on different geographic scales – a Hungarian nationwide study over 13 years
Abstract
Summary:Background: The incidence of lower limb major amputations is an important healthcare quality indicator, as it reflects all efforts aimed to prevent limb loss. Analysis of within-country regional variations in incidence may reveal the sources of disparities in care. Materials and methods: Based on the data of the Hungarian healthcare beneficiary population from 2004 to 2016, the incidence of lower limb major amputations and its spatial variations was determined regionally on four levels of geographic resolution. Variability and autocorrelation were quantified on different resolutions. Results: A total of 56,468 lower limb major amputation procedures were identified in 49,528 patients over the observation period. Marked regional variations were detected at all geographic scale levels. In the case of county-level and local administrative level, the systematic component of variation was 0.03 and 0.09, respectively. Only half of the variation at local administrative level was explained by county. Conclusions: Lower limb major amputations show marked regional variations on the different geographic levels of resolution. The more granular the assessment, the higher the regional variation was. Assumingly, this observation is partially a mathematical necessity but may also be related to the different characteristics of care at a given level of spatial aggregation. The decomposition of the variance of amputation rates indicates that the potential explanatory factors contributing to spatial variability are multiple and may be interpreted on different levels of geographic resolution. Addressing the unwarranted variations and resolving the issues that contribute to high lower limb major amputation rates needs further explorative analysis.
References
1 The year in cardiology 2014: Peripheral circulation. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(10):591–7.
2 “No more amputations”: A complex scientific problem and a challenge for effective preventive strategy implementation on vascular field. Int Angiol. 2017;36(2):107–15.
3 . Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: A pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513–30.
4 Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9901):1329–40.
5 . Selecting indicators for the quality of diabetes care at the health systems level in OECD countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18(Suppl 1):26–30.
6 International variations in amputation practice: A VASCUNET report. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(3):391–9.
7 Lower extremity amputations – A review of global variability in incidence. Diabet Med. 2011;28(10):1144–53.
8 Regional intensity of vascular care and lower extremity amputation rates. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(6):1471–9.
9 . Lower limb amputation in England: Prevalence, regional variation and relationship with revascularisation, deprivation and risk factors. A retrospective review of hospital data. J R Soc Med. 2014;107(12):483–9.
10 . Indicators for comparing the incidence of diabetic amputations: A nationwide population-based register study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(5):569–74.
11 Major amputations in type 2 diabetes between 2001 and 2015 in Spain: Regional differences. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):54.
12 . Prevalence and regional distribution of lower limb amputations from 2006 to 2012 in Germany: A population based study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(6):761–6.
13 . Regional variation in the incidence of diabetes-related amputations in The Netherlands. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996;31(1–3):125–32.
14 Lower limb amputations and revascularisation procedures in the Hungarian population: A 14 year retrospective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):447–56.
15 . Regions in the European Union – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics – NUTS 2013/EU-28. European Union; 2015. [cited 2020 Apr 5]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-GQ-14-006
16 . KSHStatinfoScraper [Database]. Available from: https://github.com/tamas-ferenci/KSHStatinfoScraper
17 : OpenStreetMap – Közigazgatási határok. Available from: https://data2.openstreetmap.hu/hatarok/index.php
18 . Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. London: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincont Wiliams & Wilkins; 2008.
19 . Revision of the European Standard Population: Report of Eurostat’s task force. Eurostat; 2013 [cited 2020 Apr 5]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5926869/KS-RA-13-028-EN.PDF/e713fa79-1add-44e8-b23d-5e8fa09b3f8f
20 . Spatial autocorrelation: A review of existing and new measures with applications. Economic Geography. 1970;46(Suppl 1):269–92.
21 Is there much variation in variation? Revisiting statistics of small area variation in health services research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:60.
22 . Bootstrap methods and their application. 1st ed. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
23 . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.
24 . data.table: Extension of “data.frame”. Version 1.11.4; 2018. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=data.table
25 . Applied spatial data analysis with R. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer; 2013.
26 . epitools: Epidemiology Tools. Version 0.5-10. 2017.
27 . boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. Version 1.3-20. 2017.
28 Temporal trends and geographic variation of lower-extremity amputation in patients with peripheral artery disease: Results from U.S. Medicare 2000–2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(21):2230–6.
29 . Geographic variation of lower-extremity major amputation in individuals with and without diabetes in the Medicare population. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(5):860–4.
30 . Variation in the recorded incidence of amputation of the lower limb in England. Diabetologia. 2012;55(7):1919–25.
31 . Regional inequalities in self-reported conditions and non-communicable diseases in European countries: Findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(Suppl 1):14–21.
32 . Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
33 . Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landsc Ecol. 1996;11(1):39–49.
34 . State of the Health in the EU, Hungary, Country Health Profile 2019. [cited 2020 May 27th]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/419461/Country-Health-Profile-2019-Hungary.pdf?ua=1
35 Unpublished survey data of the Hungarian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Scientific sessions of the Roadshow Project 2019–2021, http://www.angiologia.hu/hirek.aspx?nid=100513&cid=32.
36 Population health inequalities across and within European metropolitan areas through the lens of the EURO-HEALTHY Population Health Index. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):836.
37 Race and socioeconomic status independently affect risk of major amputation in peripheral artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(2):e007425.
38 . Potentials, challenges, and limitations of the analysis of administrative data on vascular limb amputations in health care. Vasa. 2020;49(2):87–97.
39 . Forty years of unwarranted variation – and still counting. Health Policy. 2014;114(1):1–2.
40 . Handbook of health economics, Volume 2. 1st ed.. Oxford, UK/Waltham, MA, USA: Elsevier B.V.; 2011.
