4PEPS – a new pretest probability score to reduce imaging testing for suspected pulmonary embolism?

References

• 1 Kline JA, Garrett JS, Sarmiento EJ, Strachan CC, Courtney DM. Over-testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in American emergency departments: the continuing epidemic. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13(1):e005753. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• 2 Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997–1005. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• 3 Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA. 2014;311(11):1117–24. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• 4 van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, Beenen LFM, van Bemmel T, van Es J, et al. YEARS study group. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):289–297. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• 5 Roy PM, Friou E, Germeau B, Douillet D, Kline JA, Righini M, et al. Derivation and validation of a 4-level clinical pretest probability score for suspected pulmonary embolism to safely decrease imaging testing. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;e210064. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar