Abstract
Abstract.Background: Attempts to address gambling-related harms have evolved rubrics to foster responsible gambling and informed choice. Those efforts have largely focused on apportioning the relative responsibility placed on government, industry, and individuals for reducing excessive gambling that leads to adverse consequences. Empirical evaluations of responsible gambling measures, together with proposed frameworks that set out guidelines for accountability, have met with mixed results and criticism from divergent groups of stakeholders. Aim: While harm reduction remains a worthy goal, this position paper argues against maintaining a stringent focus on the government-industry-individual triumvirate in favor of adopting a syndemic approach to gambling-related harms. Approach: A syndemic perspective suggests that gambling disorder intersects, coexists, precedes or follows other comorbid conditions and interacts with social and environmental factors that promote and enhance the negative consequences of gambling problems. This paper discussions potential syndemic stakeholders and challenges in the implementation of this approach. Conclusions: Initiatives to reduce gambling-related harm should adopt a broader perspective, involving stakeholders from diverse syndemic problem areas in developing a network to identify and address gambling problems in early stages of development across multiple settings.
Zusammenfassung.Hintergrund: Zur Minimierung von glücksspielbezogenen Schäden wurden Regelungen entwickelt um verantwortungsvolles Glücksspielen und risikobewusste Entscheidungen zu fördern. Diese Bemühungen zielten jedoch hauptsächlich darauf ab, die Verantwortung zwischen Aufsichtsbehörden, Glücksspielanbietern und dem einzelnen Spieler im Hinblick auf die Einschränkung exzessiven Spielverhaltens und den damit verbundenen negativen Folgen aufzuteilen. Die Evaluierung von Maßnahmen zur Unterstützung eines verantwortungsvollen Glücksspielens, zusammen mit Regelungen, die die Verantwortung für die Umsetzung festschreiben, brachte keine eindeutigen Ergebnisse und das Konzept wurde von verschiedenen Interessengruppen kritisiert. Ziel: Obwohl die Schadensminimierung weiterhin ein wertvolles Ziel darstellt, wird in diesem Positionspapier dagegen argumentiert, den Fokus der Verantwortung lediglich auf das „Triumvirat“ Aufsichtsbehörden, Anbieter und einzelne Glücksspieler – zu legen. Stattdessen wird ein sehr viel umfassenderer, systemischer Ansatz zur Beschränkung spielbezogenen Schadens favorisiert. Position: Einer systemischen Perspektive liegt die Annahme zugrunde, dass glücksspielbedingte Störungen mit anderen komorbiden Störungen auftreten, mit ihnen interagieren, ihnen vorausgehen oder nachfolgen. Weiterhin besteht eine Interaktion mit sozialen und Umweltfaktoren, die die negativen Folgen des Spielens verstärken und ausweiten können. Dieser Text diskutiert potentielle Interessengruppen im Rahmen eines systemischen Ansatzes sowie verschiedene Herausforderungen bei der Implementierung eines solchen Ansatzes. Schlussfolgerungen: Initiativen zur Reduzierung von glücksspielbezogenen Schäden sollten eine breitere Perspektive als bisher einnehmen. So sollte unter Einbeziehung von zusätzlichen relevanten Interessengruppen aus verschiedenen Hilfesystemen ein Netzwerk aufgebaut werden, damit Probleme, die durch das Spielen entstehen, in verschiedenen Settings bereits frühzeitig identifiziert und angegangen werden können.
Literature
2014). Early detection of pathological gambling: betting on GPs’ beliefs and attitudes. BioMed Research International, 2014.
(2010). The relationship of gambling to intimate partner violence and child maltreatment in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44(5), 331–337.
(2017). Assigning responsibility for gambling-related harm: scrutinizing processes of direct and indirect consumer responsibilization of gamblers in Sweden. Addiction Research & Theory, 1–14.
(2013). Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry’s corporate social responsibility activities. American Journal of Public Health, 103(2), 206–214.
(2011). Responsible gambling: General principles and minimal requirements. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 565–573.
(2008). Informed choice and gambling: Principles for consumer protection. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 2(1), 103–118.
(2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling studies, 20(3), 301–317.
(2003). Gambling in Canada – From vice to disease to responsibility: A negotiated history. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 20(1), 121–149.
(2017). Syndemics of depression, alcohol use, and victimisation, and their association with HIV-related sexual risk among men who have sex with men and transgender women in India. Global public health, 12(2), 250–265.
(2017). Internet gambling: A critical review of behavioural tracking research. Journal of Gambling Issues, (36), 1–27.
(2011). Disordered (pathologic or problem) gambling and axis I psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(11), 1289–1297.
(2015). Responsible gambling: Conceptual considerations. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 3, 594–599.
(1996). Pathological gambling in hospitalized substance abusing veterans. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 57(8), 360–363.
(2012). Venue staff knowledge of their patron’s gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(2), 155–169.
(2012). Behavioural profiling of problem gamblers: A summary and review. International Gambling Studies, 12(3), 349–366.
(2014). The effect of discrimination and stress on sexual & behavioral health among sexual minority servicemen: A syndemic perspective. The University of Texas at San Antonio.
(2015). Prevalence of psychiatric co-morbidity in treatment-seeking problem gamblers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(6), 519–539.
(2004). Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 240–244.
(2014). Six components necessary for effective public health program implementation. American journal of public health, 104(1), 17–22.
(2015). Effects of syndemics on HIV viral load and medication adherence in the multicenter AIDS cohort study. AIDS (London, England), 29(9), 1087.
(2009). Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 151–174.
(2011). Approaches to understanding online versus offline gaming impacts. Casino and Gaming International, 7(3), 45–48.
(2008). Gambling loyalty schemes: Treading a fine line? Casino and Gaming International, 4(2), 105–108.
(2011). Regulatory failure? The case of Crown Casino. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
(2017). Critiquing the Reno model I-IV international influence on regulators and governments (2004–2015) – the distorted reality of “responsible gambling”. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–26.
(2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534–539.
(2015). Decoding problem gamblers’ signals: A decision model for casino enterprises. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(4), 1671–1693.
(2008). DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360.
(2016). The prevalence of and factors associated with alcohol-related problems in a community sample of African American women. Journal of addiction, 2016.
(2013). Problem gambling and families: A systematic review. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 13(4), 353–372.
(2011). Identifying behavioural markers or disordered Internet sports gambling. Addiction Research and Theory, 19(1), 56–65.
(2016). Extending the Reno model: responsible gambling evaluation guidelines for gambling operators, public policymakers, and regulators. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 20(7), 580–586.
(2017). Responsible gambling: a synthesis of the empirical evidence. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(3), 225–235.
(2015). Clinical and personality characteristics associated with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in problem and pathological gamblers recruited from the community. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(2), 501–512.
(2006). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(3), 411–416.
(1983). The impact of pathological gambling on the spouse of the gambler. Journal of Community Psychology, 11(1), 67–76.
(1986). Pathological Gambling: psychosomatic, emotional and marital difficulties as reported by the gambler. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(1), 40–49.
(2010). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 67–88.
(2006). Gambling problems and health functioning in individuals receiving disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(10), 619–623.
(2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520.
(National Research Council . (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington D. C.: National Academies Press.2013).
(Legal and financial issues and disordered gambling . In D. C. S. Richard, A. Blaszczynski, & L. Nower (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Disordered Gambling, (pp. 386–399). NY: Wiley-Blackwell.2015). Problem gambling and homelessness: Results from an epidemiologic study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(2), 533–545.
(2014). Facilitating awareness and informed choice in gambling. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 8(3), 6–20.
(2016). Extending the RENO model: Clinical and ethical applications. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(3), 297.
(2017). Syndemics and the biosocial conception of health. The Lancet, 389(10072), 941–950.
(2003). Syndemics and public health: Reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 17(4), 423–441.
(2017). The Role of Drug User Stigmatization in the Making of Drug-Related Syndemics. Foundations of Biosocial Health: Stigma and Illness Interactions, 1.
(2004). Impact of warning and brief intervention messages on knowledge of gambling risk, irrational beliefs and behaviour. International Gambling Studies, 4(1), 3–16.
(2006). Does learning about the mathematics of gambling change gambling behavior? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(1), 62–68.
(2009). How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviours prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 239–252.
(