Skip to main content

Perceived and Objective Attentional Deficits in Multiple Sclerosis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1016-264X/a000153

Abstract. Initially we assessed self-rated cognitive deficits, depression and quality of life in MS patients and healthy controls (n = 299) by an online survey. Secondly, attention performance of MS outpatients (n = 33) was objectively assessed by the Test battery for Attention Performance and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Overall, MS patients rated themselves significantly worse than controls in attentional functioning. This was reflected by a weak performance in objective tests of phasic alertness and divided attention of the MS patients compared to normative data. Subscales of subjective cognitive functioning in the online survey showed significant associations with objective measures after statistical controlling for depression (r = .370 to r = .517). Results show the differences in perceived cognitive performance between MS patients and healthy controls, and self-reported instrument are able to provide relevant information on complex attention performance and hereby on everyday functioning.


Wahrgenommene und objektive Aufmerksamkeitsdefizite bei Multiple Sklerose

Zusammenfassung. In einer Onlineumfrage wurden wahrgenommene kognitive Beeinträchtigungen, Depression und Lebensqualität bei MS Patienten und gesunden Kontrollpersonen (n = 299) erhoben. In einem zweiten Schritt wurde die objektive Aufmerksamkeitsleistung in einer Klinikkohorte mit MS Patienten (n = 33) mit der Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) sowie dem Symbol Digit and Modalities Test (SDMT) erhoben. MS Patienten bewerteten ihre Aufmerksamkeitsleistungen signifikant schlechter als Gesunde. Die Klinikkohorte zeigte schlechtere Leistungen in den objektiven Tests (phasische Alertness und geteilte Aufmerksamkeit) verglichen mit Normwerten. Subjektive Tests korrelierten signifikant mit objektiven Tests nachdem für Depression kontrolliert wurde (r = .370 bis r = .517). MS Patienten unterscheiden sich von Gesunden in der Wahrnehmung ihrer kognitiven Leistungsfähigkeit und Fragebögen bilden wichtige zusätzliche Informationen zum kognitiven Erleben und Funktionieren und somit zum täglichen Leben der MS Patienten ab.

References

  • Archibald, C. J., & Fisk, J. D. (2000). Information processing efficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 686 – 701. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benedict, R. H. B., Cox, D., Thompson, L. L., Foley, F., Weinstock-Guttman, B., & Munschauer, F. (2004). Reliable screening for neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 10, 675 – 678. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benedict, R. H. B., Munschauer, F., Linn, R., Miller, C., Murphy, E., & Foley, F., et al. (2003). Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Multiple Sclerosis, 9, 95 – 101. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruce, J. M., & Arnett, P. A. (2004). Self-reported everyday memory and depression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 200 – 214. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2008). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology, 7, 1139 – 1151. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christodoulou, C., Melville, P., Scherl, W. F., Morgan, T., MacAllister, W. S., & Canfora, D. M., et al. (2005). Perceived cognitive dysfunction and observed neuropsychological performance: longitudinal relation in persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 614 – 619. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeLuca, J., Chelune, G. J., Tulsky, D. S., Lengenfelder, J., & Chiaravalloti, N. D. (2004). Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 550 – 562. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feinstein, A., DeLuca, J., Baune, B. T., Filippi, M., & Lassman, H. (2013). Cognitive and neuropsychiatric disease manifestations in MS. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 2(1), 4 – 12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flachenecker, P., & Meissner, H. (2008). Fatigue in multiple sclerosis presenting as acute relapse: subjective and objective assessment. Multiple Sclerosis, 14(2), 274 – 277. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gold, S. M., Heesen, C., Schulz, H., Guder, U., Monch, A., & Gbadamosi, J., et al. (2001). Disease specific quality of life instruments in multiple sclerosis: validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS). Multiple Sclerosis, 7, 119 – 130. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gold, S. M., Schulz, H., Monch, A., Schulz, K. H., & Heesen, C. (2003). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis does not affect reliability and validity of self-report health measures. Multiple Sclerosis, 9, 404 – 410. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heesen, C., Schulz, K. H., Fiehler, J., Von der Mark, U., Otte, C., & Jung, R., et al. (2010). Correlates of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Brain Behavior and Immunity, 24, 1148 – 1155. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Honarmand, K., & Feinstein, A. (2009). Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple Sclerosis, 15, 1518 – 1524. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kujala, P., Portin, R., Revonsuo, A., & Ruutiainen, J. (1994). Automatic and controlled information processing in multiple sclerosis. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 117, 1115 – 1126. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Brien, A., Gaudino-Goering, E., Shawaryn, M., Komaroff, E., Moore, N. B., & DeLuca, J. (2007). Relationship of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ) to functional, emotional, and neuropsychological outcomes. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 22, 933 – 948. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patti, F., Amato, M. P., Trojano, M., Bastianello, S., Tola, M. R., & Picconi, O., et al. (2011). Longitudinal changes in social functioning in mildly disabled patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving subcutaneous interferon beta-1a: results from the COGIMUS (COGnitive Impairment in MUltiple Sclerosis) study (II). Quality of Life Research, 21, 1111 – 1121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peyser, J. M., Rao, S. M., LaRocca, N. G., & Kaplan, E. (1990). Guidelines for neuropsychological research in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 47, 94 – 97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., & Filippi, M., et al. (2011). Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals of Neurology, 69, 292 – 302. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruet, A., Deloire, M., Charrè-Morin, J., Hamel, D., & Brochet, B. (2013). Cognitive impairment differs between primary progressive and relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology, 80, 1501 – 1508. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schäffler, N., Schönberg, P., Stephan, J., Stellmann, J.-P., Gold, S. M., & Heesen, C. (2013). Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 128, 114 – 121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulz, D., Kopp, B., Kunkel, A., & Faiss, J. H. (2006). Cognition in the early stage of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, 253, 1002 – 1010. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheridan, L. K., Fitzgerald, H. E., Adams, K. M., Nigg, J. T., Martel, M. M., & Puttler, L. I., et al. (2006). Normative Symbol Digit Modalities Test performance in a community-based sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 23 – 28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, A. (1995). Symbol digit modalities test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Volz-Sidiropoulou, E., Boecker, M., Niemann, H., Privou, C., Zimmermann, P., & Gauggel, S. (2007). Skala zur Erfassung von Aufmerksamkeitsdefiziten (SEA): Erste psychometrische Evaluation mit einer Rasch-Analyse. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 18, 299 – 309. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Weinges-Evers, N., Brandt, A. U., Bock, M., Pfueller, C. F., Dörr, J., & Bellmann-Strobl, J., et al. (2010). Correlation of self-assessed fatigue and alertness in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 16, 1134 – 1140. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361 – 370. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (1992). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung. Würselen: Psytest. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (2002). Ergänzungsmanual zur Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) Version 1.7 Teil 1. Herzogenrath: Psytest. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar