A confirmatory factor analysis of scores on the teacher efficacy scale
Abstract
Validity studies on the Teacher Efficacy Scale provide us with neither clear evidence nor clear solutions to the factorial structure or the theoretical concepts underlying the scale’s items. This study tests different factor structures of the Teacher Efficacy Scale as found in the literature using confirmatory factor analysis on data from a sample of 540 practicing teachers. Four factorial models were formulated based on theoretical analysis and on the results of several validity studies of the Teacher Efficacy Scale. In accordance with Bandura’s (1997) self-efficacy theory, the results revealed that the fit of the four-factor oblique model was significantly better than that of the other factorial models. However, the fit of the four-factor model did not reach the recommended criterion of adequately fitting models. After eliminating three poorly loaded items, the model’s fit improved significantly but insufficiently to reach the fit criterion. It was concluded that the Teacher Efficacy Scale in its current state does not provide precise and valid information about teacher efficacy beliefs. Recommendations to improve the factorial validity of the Teacher Efficacy Scale are made.
Literaturangaben
1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716– 723.
(1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 130 243).
(1984). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: A self- or norm-referenced construct. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 29– 41.
(1982). Measurement problems in the study of teachers’ sense of efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April.
(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward an unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191– 215.
(1990). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
(1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
(1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238– 246.
(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588– 606.
(1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII. Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 140 432).
(1997). Generality of academic self-efficacy judgments: Evidence of hierarchical relations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 696– 709.
(2001). The factorial validity of scores on the Teacher Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1), 433– 445.
(1991). The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Validating factorial and invariance across intermediate, secondary and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(4), 583– 605.
(1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456– 466.
(1997). Teacher efficacy, supervision, and the special education recourse-room teacher. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 230– 239.
(1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline. . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 755– 765.
(1998). Measuring self-efficacy in the context of HIV risk reduction: Research challenges and recommendations. Health Psychology, 17(6), 559– 568.
(1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569– 582.
(1981). Measurement of responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 44– 51.
(1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627– 643.
(1993). Teacher Efficacy and Preservice Teachers: A Construct Validation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, 16th, Clearwater Beach, FL. February (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 356 265).
(1998). Pre-service teachers’ efficacy beliefs in Taiwan. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 17– 25.
(1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and Goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 247– 255.
(1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. . Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430– 445.
(1996). Extending the concept and assessment of teacher efficacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(6), 1015– 1025.
(1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625– 638.
(1981). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 185– 190.
(1994). Beliefs that make a difference: The origins and impacts of teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 379 216).
(1998). Antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching(Vol. 7, 49-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1– 28.
(1988). Teachers’ efficacy and teaching behaviors.. Psychological Reports, 63, 407– 414.
(1993). Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in special education refferal. Journal of Special Education, 27, 66– 81.
(1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 401– 411.
(1998). Teacher efficacy and the vulnerability of the difficult-to-teach student. Journal of Special Education, 31(1), 480– 497.
(1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202– 248.
(1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Research, 82(1), 81– 91.
(1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 137– 148.
(