Entitativity of Generations, Age Groups and Cohorts as Perceived by Young Adults
Abstract
Perceptions of the entitativity of age groups, cohorts, and generations were studied in a sample of young adults. Participants rated one of three age groups (young adults, middle-aged adults, older adults), described either as generations (e.g., Baby Boom generation), by age (e.g., people 50 years old), or as cohorts (e.g., people born between 1945 and 1950). Ratings were made on entitativity and related properties (importance of membership to members, shared experience, common goals, common values, similarity among members). Results show that age groups and generations are meaningful social categories for laypersons, whereas cohorts are not.
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice.Bangerter, A. , Grob, A. , Krings, F. (2001). Personal goals at age 25 in three generations of the twentieth century: Young adulthood in historical context. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 59– 64Birren, J. E. , Schaie, K. W. (2001). Handbook of the psychology of aging. San Diego: AcademicBridel, F. (2002). Non, nous n’étions pas des lâches. Vivre en Suisse 1933-1945. [No, we were not cowards. Living in Switzerland 1933-1945]. Geneva: SlatkineConway, M. A. (1997). The inventory of experience: Memory and identity. n J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rimé (Eds.), Collective memory of political events: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 21-45). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumCoupland, D. (1991). Generation X: Tales for an accelerated culture. New York: St. Martin’sCrawford, M. T. , Sherman, S. J. , Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1076– 1094Danigelis, N. L. , Cutler, S. J. (1991). Cohort trends in attitudes about law and order: Who’s leading the conservative wave?. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 24– 49Doosje, B. , Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235– 248Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International University PressGrob, A. , Krings, F. , Bangerter, A. (2001). Life markers in biographical narratives of people from three cohorts: A life span perspective in its historical context. Human Development, 44, 171– 190Hamilton, D. L. , Sherman, S. J. , Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumHavighurst, R. J. (1948). Developmental tasks and education. New York: McKayHolmes, A. , Conway, M. A. (1999). Generation identity and the reminiscence bump: Memory for public and private events. Journal of Adult Development, 6, 21– 34Höpflinger, F. (1999). Generationenfrage. Konzepte, theoretische Ansätze und Beobachtungen zu Generationenbeziehungen in späteren Lebensphasen. [Generation questions. Concepts, theoretical approaches and observations of generational relations in later phases of life]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Réalités SocialesHummel, C. , Lalive d’Epinay, C. (1995). Images of aging in Western societies. Geneva: Center for Interdisciplinary GerontologyHummert, M. L. , Garstka, T. A. , Shaner, J. L. , Strahm, S. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Journals-of-Gerontology, 49, (5) 240– 249Illies, F. (2001). Generation Golf. Eine Inspektion. [Generation Golf. An inspection]. Frankfurt, Germany: FischerLickel, B. , Hamilton, D. L. , Wieczorkowska, G. , Lewis, A. , Sherman, S. J. , Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223– 246Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan PaulMcCrae, R. R. , Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: GuilfordNelson, T. D. (Ed.). (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: MITOstrom, T. M. , Sedikides, C. (1992). Outgroup homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536– 552Riley, M. W (1973). Aging and cohort succession: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 35– 49Rogier, A. , Yzerbyt, V. (1999). Social attribution, correspondence bias, and the emergence of stereotypes. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 233– 240Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843– 861Schuman, H. , Scott, J. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review, 54, 359– 381Slotterback, C. S. (1996). Projections of aging: Impact of generational differences and the aging process on perceptions of adults. Psychology and Aging, 11, 552– 559Tabachnik, B. G. , Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & BaconWilliams, A. , Coupland, J. , Folwell, A. , Sparks, L. (1997). Talking about Generation X: Defining them as they define themselves. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 16, 251– 277Yzerbyt, V. , Rogier, A. , Fiske, S. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: on translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1090– 1104
