Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.65.3.193

A developmental study was conducted that investigated 7- to 11- years-olds’ ability to strategically regulate their memory performance. The study, based on Koriat and Goldsmith’s (1996) theoretical framework, sought to stimulate strategic regulation processes. In order to do so, the threshold to provide or withhold answers was manipulated and included bonuses for correct responding and penalties for incorrect answers. Participants were shown a video concerning the production of sugar from beets and were individually interviewed a week later. Responses had to be made to both answerable and unanswerable questions in both an open-ended and a yes/no question format. The results revealed that depending on the question format, there were different effects of the threshold manipulations on the frequencies of correct, incorrect, and “I don’t know” responses. Although there were no differences in response behaviour between the 1:0 and 1:1 incentives conditions when the questions were open-ended, children were able to differentially respond to the two bonus-to-penalty ratios when the questions were in yes/no format. Consistently, there were no interactions between age and response threshold indicating that strategic regulation competencies develop slowly but continuously during the primary school years showing the first signs of emerging competencies from an age of 7 onwards.

References

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beuscher, E., Roebers, C. M. (2005). Does a warning help children to more accurately remember an event, to resist misleading questions, and to identify unanswerable questions? Experimental Psychology, 52, 232–241. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Beuscher, E., Roebers, C. M., Schneider, W. (2005). Was erinnern Kinder von Lernfilmen? [What do children recall from educational movies]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 52, 51–65. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bjorklund, D. F., Rosenblum, K. E. (2001). Children’s use of multiple and variable addition strategies in a game context. Developmental Science, 4, 184–194. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bjorklund, D. F., Rosenblum, K. E. (2002). Context effects in children’s selection and use of simple arithmetic strategies. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 225–242. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review Psychology, 50, 419–439. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruck, M., Melnyk, L., Ceci, S. J. (2000). Draw it again Sam: The effect of drawing on children’s suggestibility and source monitoring ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 169–196. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dudukovic, N. M., Marsh, E. J., Tversky, B. (2004). Telling a story or telling it straight: The effects of entertaining versus accurate retellings on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 125–144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fivush, R., Haden, C. A. (Eds.) (2003). Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self: Developmental and cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, G. S., Sharma, A., Thomas, S. F., Golden Considine, M. (1995). Mother knows best: Effects of relationship status and interviewer bias on children’s memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 195–228. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, S., Crockenberg, S (1998). A comparison of suggestibility in 4-year-old girls in response to parental or stranger misinformation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 527–542. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M. (1998). The role of metacognitive processes in the regulation of memory performance. In G. Mazzoni, T. O. Nelson (Eds.), Metacognitive and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., Schneider, W., Nakash-Dura, M. (2001). The credibility of children’s testimony: Can children control the accuracy of their memory reports? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 405–437. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, T. O., Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, (pp. 125–173). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, C., Whalen, N. (2001). Five years later: Children’s memory for medical emergencies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, S7–S24. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ornstein, P. A., Haden, C. A., Hedrick, A. M. (2004). Learning to remember: Social-communicative exchanges and the development of childrens’ memory skills. Developmental Review, 24, 374–395. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C.M. (2002). Confidence judgments in children’s and adults’ event recall and suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 38, 1052–1067. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C. M., Fernandez, O. (2002). The effects of accuracy motivation on children’s and adults’ event recall, suggestibility and their answers to unanswerable questions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 415–443. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C. M., Howie, P. (2003). Confidence judgments in event recall: Developmental progression in the impact of question format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 352–371. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C. M., Moga, N., Schneider, W. (2001). The role of accuracy motivation on childrens’ and adults’ event recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 313–329. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C. M., Schneider, W. (2001). Memory for an observed event in the presence of prior misinformation: Developmental patterns in free recall and identification accuracy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 507–524. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C. M., Schneider, W. (2005). The strategic regulation of children’s memory performance and suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 24–44. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., Howie, P. (in press). Favourable and unfavourable conditions for childrens’ confidence judgments. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W. (1998). The development of procedural metamemory in childhood and adolescence. In G. Mazzoni, T. O. Nelson (Eds.), Metacognitive and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W., Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Memory. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: (Vol. 2.) Cognition, perception, and language (5th Ed. pp. 467–521). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar