Learning or Succeeding? Conflict Regulation With Mastery or Performance Goals
Abstract
The present study aimed to integrate research on mastery and performance goals into research on sociocognitive conflict (confrontation involving divergent points of view). Participants interacted by discussing conflictual issues in a context enhancing either performance goals, mastery goals, or no goals. The amount of disagreement during the interaction was measured. Results indicated that disagreement predicted epistemic conflict regulation (focused on task comprehension) in the mastery goals condition, but relational conflict regulation (focused on affirmation of competence) in the performance goals condition. Results are discussed in terms of their contribution to the conflict regulation framework.
References
Albaili, M. A. (1998). Goal orientations, cognitive strategies, and academic achievement among United Arab Emirates college students. Educational Psychology, 18, 195– 203Al-Emadi, A. A. (2001). The relationships among achievement, goal orientation, and study strategies. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 823– 832Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 177-207). New York: Academic PressAmes, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and students motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261– 271Ames, G. J. , Murray, F. B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18, 894– 897Bearison, D. J. (1982). New directions in studies of social interaction and cognitive growth. In F. C. Serafica (Ed.), Social-cognitive development in context (pp. 199-221). New York: Guilford PressBuchs, C. , Butera, F. (2004). Sociocognitive conflict and the role of student interaction in learning. New Review of Social Psychology, 3, 80– 87Buchs, C. , Butera, F. , Mugny, G. , Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 43, 23– 30Butera, F. , Buchs, C. (2005). Reasoning together: From focusing to decentering. In V. Girotto & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The shape of reason (pp. 269-284). Hove, UK: Psychology PressButera, F. , Huguet, P. , Mugny, G. , Pérez, J. A. (1994). Socio-epistemic conflict and constructivism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 229– 239Butera, F. , Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low expertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457– 462Butera, F. , Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C. K. W. De Dreu & N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 161-182). Oxford, UK: BlackwellButera, F. , Mugny, G. , Tomei, A. (2000). Incertitude et enjeux identitaires dans l’influence sociale. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociale (Vol. VII, pp. 205-229). Rennes, France: Presses universitaires de RennesButler, R. (1992). What young people want to know when: Effects of mastery and ability goals on interest in different kinds of social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 934– 943Butler, R. , Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 261– 271Carugati, F. , DePaolis, P. , Mugny, G. (1980-1981). Conflit de centrations et progrès cognitif, III: Régulations cognitives et relationnelles du conflit socio-cognitif. Bulletin de Psychologie, 34, 843– 851Cheung, P. C. , Ma, H. D. , Shek, D. T. L. (1998). Conceptions of success: Their correlates with prosocial orientation and behaviour in chinese adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 31– 42Darnon, C. , Buchs, C. , Butera, F. (2002). Epistemic and relational conflict in sharing information during cooperative learning. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 139– 151Darnon, C. , Butera, F. , Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning within a mastery vs. performance context. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 61– 70Darnon, C. , Muller, D. , Schrager, S. M. , Pannuzzo, N. , Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766– 776Doise, W. , Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford, UK: Pergamon PressDoise, W. , Mugny, G. , Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1976). Social interaction and cognitive development: Further evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 245– 247Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, (1040). 1048Dweck, C. S. (1992). The study of goals in psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 165– 167Dweck, C. S. , Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256– 273Elliot, A. J. (1997). ntegrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance motivation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAIElliot, A. J. , Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461– 475Elliot, A. J. , McGregor, H. A. , Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549– 563Gruber, H. E. (2000). Creativity and conflict resolution: The role of point of view. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 345-354). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassJohnson, D. W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Researcher, 10, 5– 10Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. (1985). Classroom conflict: Controversy versus debate in learning groups. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 237– 256Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. (1993). Structuring academic controversy. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 66-81). Westport, CT: GreenwoodJohnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. (1994). The pro-con cooperative group strategy: Structuring academic controversy within the social studies classroom. In R. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers (pp. 306-331). New York: Addison-WestleyJohnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. , Tjosvold, D. (2000). Constructive controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 65-85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassJudd, C. M. , McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, JovanovichKaplan, A. , Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330– 358Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 37– 58Katz, T. Y. , Block, C. Y (2000). rocess and outcome goal orientations in conflict situations. The importance of framing. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 279-288). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassLowry, N. , Johnson, D. W. (1981). Effect of controversy on epistemic curiosity, achievement and attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 31– 43Maehr, M. L. , Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing students motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399– 427Marr, M. B. (1997). Cooperative learning: A brief review. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 7– 21Middleton, M. , Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710– 718Mugny, G. , Butera, F. , Quiamzade, A. , Dragulescu, A. , Tomei, A. (2003). Comparaisons sociales des compétences et dynamiques d’influence sociale dans les tâches d’aptitudes. L’Année Psychologique, 104, 469– 496Mugny, G. , DePaolis, P. , Carugati, F. (1984). Social regulations in cognitive development. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development (pp. 127-146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressMugny, G. , Doise, W. (1978). Sociocognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181– 192Mugny, G. , Doise, W. , Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1975-1976). Conflit de centrations et progrès cognitifs. Bulletin de Psychologie, 29, 199– 204Mugny, G. , Giroud, J. C. , Doise, W. (1978-1979). Conflit de centrations et progrès cognitif, II: Nouvelles illustrations expérimentales. Bulletin de Psychologie, 32, 979– 985Mugny, G. , Levy, M. , Doise, W. (1978). Conflit socio-cognitif et développement cognitif. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 37, 22– 43Mugny, G. , Tafani, E. , Butera, F. , Pigière, D. (1999). Contrainte et dépendance informationnelles: Influence sociale sur la représentation du groupe d’amis idéal. Connexions, 72, 55– 72Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological-Review, 91, 328– 346Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269– 287Quiamzade, A. , Falomir, J. M. , Mugny, G. , Butera, F. (1999). Gestion identitaire vs. épistémique des compétences. In H. Hansen, B. Sigrist, H. Goorhuis & H. Landolt (Eds.), Bildung und Arbeit: Das Ende einer Differenz (pp. 267-276). Aarau, Switzerland: SauerländerQuiamzade, A. , Tomei, A. , Butera, F. (2000). Informational dependence and informational constraint: Social comparison and social influences in an anagram resolution task. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 123– 150Ryan, A. M. , Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help? The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329– 341Sarrazin, P. , Vallerand, R. J. , Guillet, E. , Pelletier, L. , Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 395– 418Slavin, R. E. (1994). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & BaconSmith, K. , Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. (1984). Effects of controversy on learning in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 199– 209Somuncuoglu, Y. , Yildirim, A. (1999). Relationship between achievement goal orientations and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 267– 278Tjosvold, D. (1989). Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 285– 342Tjosvold, D. , Johnson, D. W. (1977). Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 679– 685Tjosvold, D. , Johnson, D. W. , Fabrey, L. J. (1980). Effect of controversy and defensiveness on cognitive perspective taking. Psychological Reports, 47, 1043– 1053Tjosvold, D. , Johnson, D. W. , Lerner, J. (1981). Effects of affirmation and acceptance on incorporation of opposing information in problem solving. The Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 103– 110Tjosvold, D. , Nibler, R. , Wan, P. (2001). Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students: Effects of others’ expertise and one’s own confidence on engaging in conflict. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 353– 363Urdan, T. C. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 99-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI