Adults’ Versus Children’s Performance on the Stroop Task: Insights From Ex-Gaussian Analysis
Abstract
In the Geneva Variability Study, the Stroop task was administered to children and young adults. Interference and facilitation effects were investigated by comparing mean reaction times (RTs) and applying ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Our analyses were motivated by three goals: First, we aimed to replicate the results obtained with young adults by Spieler, Balota, and Faust (2000); second, we applied this method to children’s data; third, the question of age-related differences in these inhibitory processes was investigated with the ex-Gaussian approach. In young adults, findings pertaining to the interference effect reported by Spieler et al. (2000) were replicated; in children, the interference effect was only manifested in the estimated Gaussian parameters (Mean RT, μ, σ); facilitation effects were only observed in children. The substantive meaning of the results and the advantages of ex-Gaussian analyses for describing RT distributions are discussed.
References
Adleman, N. E., Menon, V., Blasey, C. M., White, C. D., Arsofsky, I. S., Glover, G. H., et al. (2002). A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. NeuroImage, 16, 61– 75Brown, S., Cousineau, D., Heathcote, A. (2001). Technical manual for QMPE v2.18:. Fortran code to fit response time distributionsBrown, S., Heathcote, A. (2003). QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 485– 492Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. M. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task switching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37, 715– 730Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332– 361Comalli, P., Wapner, S., Werner, H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47– 53Coyle, T. R. (2003). A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence, 31, 567– 587.Dempster, F. N. (1991). Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 157–173.Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45– 75Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Ulug, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, 9– 16Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 31/2-7-years-old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129– 153Hasher, L., Lustig, C., Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 227-249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressHeathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340– 347Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 598– 615Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382– 386Huynh, H., Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69– 82Kane, M. J., Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47– 70Leth-Steensen, C., Elbaz, Z. K., Douglas, V. I. (2000). Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: A response time distributional approach. Acta Psychologica, 104, 167– 190MacLeod, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163– 203McAuley, T., Yap, S., Christ, S. E., White, D. A. (2006). Revisiting inhibitory control across the life span: Insights from the ex-Gaussian distribution. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 447– 458McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (Vol. 1). New York: WileyRatcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446– 461Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461– 179Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., Faust, M. E. (2000). Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 506– 526Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 18, 643– 662West, R., Murphy, K. J., Armilio, M. L., Craik, F. I. M., Stuss, D. T. (2002). Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain and Cognition, 49, 402– 419Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205– 213
