Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000004

Relationships of second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) versus absolute finger length, two putative markers for prenatal vs. pubertal-adolescent testosterone exposure, with specific behavioral responses to interpersonal conflict, as assessed with the Conflict Dynamics Profile (CDP; Davis, Capobianco, & Kraus, 2004), were examined in an adult community sample of 132 men and women. Paralleling related findings for specific types of aggression (namely, reactive and indirect, i.e., social/relational aggression), results showed analogous sex differences for conflict-related behaviors. Specifically, women scored significantly higher than men on the CDP Hot Buttons component, assessing upset in response to workplace-related conflict elicited by problematic behavior of workmates. Among women (but not men), higher Hot Button scores corresponded significantly to higher prenatal testosterone (indexed by lower 2D:4D). Extending previous evidence for associations between 2D:4D and aggression, this suggests possible contributions of prenatal sex-hormonal masculinization to within-sex individual variation in specific types of conflict-related behavior.

References

  • Austin, E.J., Manning, J.T., McInroy, K., Mathews, E. (2002). A preliminary investigation of the associations between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1115–1124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bailey, A.A., Hurd, P.L. (2005). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women. Biological Psychology, 68, 215–222. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Behling, O., Law, K.S. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benderlioglu, Z., Nelson, R.J. (2004). Digit length ratios predict reactive aggression in women, but not in men. Hormones and Behavior, 46, 558–564. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, W.M., Hines, M., Fane, B.A., Breedlove, S.M. (2002). Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 380–386. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattrall, F.R., Vollenhoven, B.J., Weston, G.C. (2005). Anatomical evidence for in utero androgen exposure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 1689–1692. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coates, J.M., Gurnell, M., Rustichini, A. (2009). Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 623–628. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen-Bendahan, C.C.C., van de Beek, C., Berenbaum, S.A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 353–384. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coyne, S.M., Manning, J.T., Ringer, L., Bailey, L. (2007). Directional asymmetry (right-left differences) in digit ratio (2D:4D) predict indirect aggression in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 865–872. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, M.H., Capobianco, S., Kraus, L.A. (2004a). Conflict Dynamics Profile® individual version: Questionnaire and development guide. St. Petersburg, FL: Eckerd College. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, M.H., Capobianco, S., Kraus, L.A. (2004b). Measuring conflict-related behaviors: Reliability and validity evidence regarding the Conflict Dynamics Profile. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 707–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ecker, A. (1875). Einige Bemerkungen über einen schwankenden Charakter in der Hand des Menschen [Some remarks on a varying property of the human hand]. Archiv für Anthropologie (Braunschweig), 8, 67–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gallup, A.C., White, D.D., Gallup, G.G., Jr. (2007). Handgrip strength predicts sexual behavior, body morphology, and aggression in male college students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 423–429. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geschwind, N., Galaburda, A.M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations and pathology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hampson, E., Ellis, C.L., Tenk, C.M. (2008). On the relation between 2D:4D and sex-dimorphic personality traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 133–144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hurd, P.L., Bailey, A.A., Gongal, P.A., Yan, R.H., Greer, J.J., Pagliardini, S. (2008). Intrauterine position effects on anogenital distance and digit ratio in male and female mice. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 9–18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kállai, J., Csathó, A., Kövér, F., Makány, T., Nemes, J., Horváth, K. et al. (2005). MRI-assessed volume of left and right hippocampi in females correlates with the relative length of the second and fourth fingers (the 2D:4D ratio). Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 140, 199–210. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kondo, T.J., Zákány, J., Innis, J.W., & Duboule, D. (1997). Of fingers, toes and penises. Nature, 390, 29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuepper, Y., Hennig, J. (2007). Behavioral aggression is associated with the 2D:4D ratio in men but not in women. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 64–72. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Lippa, R.A. (2006). Finger lengths, 2D:4D ratios, and their relation to gender-related personality traits and the Big Five. Biological Psychology, 71, 116–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lombardo, M.P., Thorpe, P.A. (2008). Digit ratios in green anolis lizards (Anolis carolinensis). Anatomical Record, 291, 433–440. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., Manning, J.T. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Human Development, 77, 23–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malas, M.A., Dogan, S., Evcil, E.H., Desdicioglu, K. (2006). Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Human Development, 82, 469–475. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J.T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J.T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D.I., Trivers, R.L., Singh, D. et al. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 163–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J.T., Bundred, P.E., Newton, D.J., Flanagan, B.F. (2003). The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 399–405. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J.T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., Lewis-Jones, D.I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and estrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J.T., Trivers, R.L., Singh, D., Thornhill, R. (1999). The mystery of female beauty. Nature, 399, 214–215. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFadden, D., Shubel, E. (2002). Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 492–500. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McIntyre, M.H., Barrett, E.S., McDermott, R., Johnson, D.D.P., Cowden, J., Rosen, S.P. (2007). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 755–764. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Medland, S.M., Loehlin, J.C., Martin, N.G. (2008). No effects of prenatal hormone transfer on digit ratio in a large sample of same- and opposite-sex dizygotic twins. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1225–1234. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millet, K., Dewitte, S. (2007). Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of an aggressive music video on aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 289–294. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, R.J. (2005). An introduction to behavioral endocrinology (3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Proyer, R.T., Häusler, J. (2007). Gender differences in vocational interests and their stability across different assessment methods. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 243–247. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rizwan, S., Manning, J.T., Brabin, B.J. (2007). Maternal smoking during pregnancy and possible effects of in utero testosterone: Evidence from the 2D:4D finger length ratio. Early Human Development, 83, 97–90. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salazar-Martinez, E., Romano-Riquer, P., Yanez-Marquez, E., Longnecker, M.P., Hernandez-Avila, M. (2004). Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. Environmental Health, 13, 8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Talarovičová, A., Kršková, L., Blačeková, J. (2009). Testosterone enhancement during pregnancy influences the 2D:4D ratio and open field motor activity of rat siblings in adulthood. Hormones and Behavior, 55, 235–239. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trivers, R., Manning, J.T., Jacobson, A. (2006). A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 150–156. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Dressler, S.G. (2006). Lack of correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and Baron-Cohen’s “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test, empathy, systemising, and autism-spectrum quotients in a general population sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1481–1491. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Dressler, S.G. (2007). Digit ratio (2D:4D) in twins: Heritability estimates and evidence for a masculinized trait expression in women from opposite-sex pairs. Psychological Reports, 100, 115–126. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Loibl, L.M. (2009). Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research, 1998–2008. Psychological Reports, 104, 922–956. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Offenmüller, D. (2007). Digit ratios (2D:4D and other) and relative thumb length: A test of developmental stability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 143–152. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Pavlovic, S. (2007). The tell-tale hand: The relationship of 2D:4D to perceived attractiveness, sex typicality, and other attributes of palms. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 88–97. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Dressler, S.G., Loibl, L.M. (2008). The contributions of Hans-Dieter Rösler: Pioneer of digit ratio (2D:4D) research. Psychological Reports, 103, 899–916. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Dressler, S.G., Manning, J.T. (2007). Evidence for assortative mating on digit ratio (2D:4D), a biomarker for prenatal androgen exposure. Journal of Biosocial Science, 39, 599–612. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Manning, J.T., Dressler, S.G. (2007). Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 142–146. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weis, S.E., Firker, A., Hennig, J. (2007). Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 485–493. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar