Skip to main content
Original Communication

The Four- vs. Alternative Six-Factor Structure of the French WISC-IV

Comparison Using Confirmatory Factor Analyses

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000026

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reported in the French technical manual of the WISC-IV provides evidence supporting a structure with four indices: Verbal Comprehension (VCI), Perceptual Reasoning (PRI), Working Memory (WMI), and Processing Speed (PSI). Although the WISC-IV is more attuned to contemporary theory, it is still not in total accordance with the dominant theory: the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive ability. This study was designed to determine whether the French WISC-IV is better described with the four-factor solution or whether an alternative model based on the CHC theory is more appropriate. The intercorrelations matrix reported in the French technical manual was submitted to confirmatory factor analysis. A comparison of competing models suggests that a model based on the CHC theory fits the data better than the current WISC-IV structure. It appears that the French WISC-IV in fact measures six factors: crystallized intelligence (Gc), fluid intelligence (Gf), short-term memory (Gsm), processing speed (Gs), quantitative knowledge (Gq), and visual processing (Gv). We recommend that clinicians interpret the subtests of the French WISC-IV in relation to this CHC model in addition to the four indices.

References

  • Alfonso, V. C., Flanagan, D. P., Radwan, S. (2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 185–202). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burton, D. B., Sepehri, A., Hecht, F., Vandenbrock, A., Ryan, J. J., Drabman, R. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-III in a clinical sample with cross-validation in the standardization sample. Child Neuropsychology, 7, 104–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P. (2000). Wechsler-based CHC cross-battery assessment and reading achievement: Strengthening the validity of interpretations drawn from Wechsler Test Scores. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 295–329. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., Mascolo, J. T. (2005). Psychoeducational assessment and learning disability diagnosis. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 521–544). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S. (1997). A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: Narrowing the gap between practice and cognitive science. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 314–325). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S. (1998). Interpreting intelligence tests from contemporary Gf-Gc theory: Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the WJ-R and KAIT in a nonwhite sample. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 151–182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. (2001). Essentials of cross-battery assessment. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S., Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc theory. A contemporary approach to interpretation. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Floyd, R. G., Bergeron, R., McCormack, A. C., Anderson, J. L., Hargrove-Owens, G. L. (2005). Are Cattell-Horn-Carroll broad ability composite scores exchangeable across batteries? School Psychology Review, 34, 329–357. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Floyd, R. G., Evans, J. J., McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 155–171. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., Taub, G. E., McGrew, K. S. (2007). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and their effects on reading decoding skills: g has indirect effects, more specific abilities have direct effects. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 200–233. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grégoire, J. (2006). L’examen clinique de l’intelligence de l’enfant. Fondements et pratiques du WISC-IV [The clinical examination of the intelligence of the child. Foundations and practice of the WISC-IV]. Sprimont: Mardaga. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L., Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman-Singer, J., Kaufman, N. L. (2005). The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (2nd ed.) and the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Test. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 344–370). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keith, T. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373–402). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keith, T. Z. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 581–614). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Taub, G. E., Reynolds, M. R., Kranzler, J. H. (2006). Higher order, multisample, confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – fourth edition: What does it measure? School Psychology Review, 35, 108–127. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McArdle, J. J., Hamagami, F., Meredith, W., Bradway, K. P. (2000). Modeling the dynamics hypotheses of Gf-Gc theory using longitudinal life-span data. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 53–79. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft,, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151–179). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–181). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phelps, L., McGrew, K. S., Knopik, S. N., Ford, L. (2005). The general (g), broad, and narrow CHC stratum characteristics of the WJ III and WISC-III tests: A confirmatory cross-battery investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 66–88. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., Weiss, L. G. (2005). WISC-IV. Clinical use and interpretation. San Diego: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Prifitera, A., Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Rolfhus, E. (2005). The WISC-IV in the clinical assessment context. In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV. Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 3–32). San Diego: Elsevier. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1993). Influence of working memory on adult age differences in matrix reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 171–199. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schrank, F. A. (2005). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 371–401). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taub, G. E., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 187–198. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taub, G. E., McGrew, K. S., Witta, E. L. (2004). A confirmatory analysis of the factor structure and cross-age invariance of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – third edition. Psychological Assessment, 16, 85–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, M. W. (2006). Orthogonal higher order structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – fourth edition. Psychological Assessment, 18, 123–125. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, M. W., Wilson, S. M., Kotz, K. M., Carbone, M. C., Babula, T. (2006). Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – fourth edition among referred students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 975–983. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. (1949). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Third edition (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. (2005). Manuel de l’Echelle d’Intelligence de Wechsler pour Enfants – 4e édition [Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – fourth edition]. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhu, J., Weiss, L. (2005). The Wechsler scales. In D. P. Flanagan, P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 297–324). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar