The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Factor Structure and Consistency of a French Translation
Abstract
Successful emotion regulation is a key aspect of efficient social functioning and personal well-being. Difficulties in emotion regulation lead to relationship impairments and are presumed to be involved in the onset and maintenance of some psychopathological disorders as well as inappropriate behaviors. Gratz and Roemer (2004) developed the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a comprehensive instrument measuring emotion regulation problems that encompasses several dimensions on which difficulties can occur. The aim of the present work was to develop a French translation of this scale and to provide an initial validation of this instrument. The French version was created using translation and backtranslation procedures and was tested on 455 healthy students. Congruence between the original and the translated scales was .98 (Tucker’s phi) and internal consistency of the translation reached .92 (Cronbach’s α). Moreover, test-retest scores were highly correlated. Altogether, the initial validation of the French version of the DERS (DERS-F) offers satisfactory results and permits the use of this instrument to map difficulties in emotion regulation in both clinical and research contexts.
References
(1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. doi 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
(2000). Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation: A possible prelude to violence. Science, 289, 591–594. doi 10.1126/science.289.5479.591
(2008). Introduction: Emotions, emotion regulation, and health. In , Emotion regulation: Conceptual and clinical issues (pp. 3–11). New York: Springer.
(2004). Emotion-related regulation: Sharpening the definition. Child Development, 75, 334–339.
(2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.
(1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.
(2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291. doi 10.1017.S0048577201393198
(1997). Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 95–103.
(1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 151–164.
(2001). The next generation of the ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172. doi 10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164
(1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1–30.
(2004). Emotion regulation and the dynamics of feelings: A conceptual and methodological framework. Child Development, 75, 354–360.
(1989). Regulation of distress and negative emotions: A developmental view. Developmental Psychology, 25, 343–354. doi 10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.343
(2002). La traduction des questionnaires et des tests: techniques et problèmes [
Translation of questionnaires and tests: Techniques and problems ]. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(1), 61–67.(2005). Some observations on the scree test, and on coefficient α. Thai Journal of Educational Research and Measurement, 3(1), 1–17.
(2005). Level of emotional awareness as a differentiating variable between individuals with and without generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 557–572. doi 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.06.001
(2004). Cognitive regulation of emotion: Application to clinical disorders. In , The regulation of emotion (pp. 71–98). New York: Erlbaum.
(1996). The double-edged sword: Emotional regulation for children at risk. Development and Psychopathology, 8(1), 163–182. doi 10.1017/S0954579400007021
(1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel research section report No. 984. Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
(2003, April). Re-visiting exploratory methods for construct comparability: Is there something to be gained from the ways of old? In , Construct comparability research: Methodological issues and results. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Chicago, IL.
