Manipulation of Arousal by Caffeine Reduces Metacontrast Masking Mostly When Target and Mask Shapes Are Incongruent
Abstract
Metacontrast masking is a popular method used to control target accessibility for explicit perception. It is thus a valuable tool in research on preconscious processing, consciousness mechanisms, and visual sensory interactions. However, the dependence of metacontrast effects on nonspecific factors determining subjects’ general arousal level has not been studied. We manipulated arousal by caffeine versus placebo treatment and found, instead of the expected uniform improvement in target perception with caffeine, an intricate interaction between target-to-mask temporal delay, congruence between target and mask shapes, and arousal condition. Caffeine improved target perception mostly when a longer SOA was used in combination with shape-wise incongruent target-mask pairings. Possible reasons for this effect are discussed.
References
(2010). Individual differences in metacontrast masking are enhanced by perceptual learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 656–666.
(2009). Revisiting the metacontrast dissociation: Comparing sensitivity across different processing measures and tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 286–309.
(2007). Comparing sensitivity across different processing measures under metacontrast masking conditions. Vision Research, 47, 3335–3349.
(1998). Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: Exploring some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation. Perception, 27, 1177–1189.
(2009). Boosting up gamma-band oscillations leaves target-stimulus in masking out of awareness: Explaining an apparent paradox. Neuroscience Letters, 450, 351–355.
(1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
(2011). The experimental phenomena of consciousness: A brief dictionary (rev. ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
(2004). Metacontrast masking is specific to luminance polarity. Vision Research, 44, 2537–2543.
(2006). Visual masking. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
(1979). Interaction of stimulus size and retinal eccentricity in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 101–109.
(2005). Caffeine, but not nicotine, enhances visual feature binding. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 591–595.
(2006). Differential c-Fos immunoreactivity in arousal-promoting cell groups following systemic administration of caffeine in rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 498, 667–689.
(2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research, 44, 1321–1331.
(2010). Role of the central ascending neurotransmitter systems in the psychostimulant effects of caffeine. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 20(1), S35–S49.
(2000). Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 107, 768–787.
(1999). Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacological Reviews, 51(1), 83–133.
(1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 404–425.
(1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976–992.
(2000). The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 7556–7560.
(2011). Target-mask shape congruence impacts the type of metacontrast masking. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 524–529.
(2010). Caffeine enhances frontal relative negativity of slow brain potentials in a task-free experimental setup. Brain Research Bulletin, 82(1–2), 39–45.
(2004). Coffee, tea, chocolate, and the brain. London, UK: CRC Press.
(2010). Attention and nonretinotopic feature integration. Journal of Vision, 10(12), 8, 1–13. doi 10.1167/10.12.8
(2009). Target visibility in the standing wave illusion: Is mask-target shape similarity important? Perception, 38(1), 5–16.
(2009). Nonretinotopic feature integration decreases response-locked brain activity as revealed by electrical neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 48, 405–414.
(2010). Sensitivity and perceptual awareness increase with practice in metacontrast masking. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–18. doi 10.1167/9.10.18
S. (2006). Caffeine and activation theory: Effects on health and behavior. London, UK: CRC Press.
(2007). Effects of caffeine on anticipatory control processes: Evidence from a cued task-switch paradigm. Psychophysiology, 44, 561–578.
(2006). Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching. Biological Psychology, 73, 101–113.
(1980). Foveal metacontrast: I. Criterion content and practice effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 473–485.
(1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses. American Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 40–64.
