Relationship Quality among Swiss Women in Opposite-Sex Versus Same-Sex Romantic Relationships
Abstract
Romantic relationship quality is an important factor for well-being. Most research on romantic relationships is based on heterosexual couples, but studies of different types of dyads showed that relationship functioning among same-sex couples is similar to that among heterosexual couples. However, a few studies suggest that lesbian partners are better communicators and more satisfied in their romantic relationships. The present study aimed to replicate these findings with a sample of Swiss couples, as most of the previous studies have been based on US-American samples. Eighty-two women who were currently in a romantic relationship with either a male or a female partner completed an online questionnaire about their relationship functioning. Compared to heterosexual women, lesbian women reported receiving better support from and experiencing less conflict with their female partners. They also showed a trend toward being more satisfied in their relationship. The study supports the notion that, relative to heterosexual couples, the quality of support and conflict interactions may be enhanced in female same-sex couples.
References
(2010). Gender, topic, and time in observed demand-withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 233–242. doi 10.1037/A0019717
(2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In , Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2008). Dyadic coping inventory: Manual. Bern, Switzerland: Huber Tests.
(2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89. doi 10.1300/J087v44n01_04
(2008). Multidimensional Stress Questionnaire for Couples (MDS-Q). Unpublished questionnaire.
(1986). Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 454–460. doi 10.1037/0022-006X.54.4.454
(1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2005). The relationship enhancement model of social support. In , Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 73–95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2001). Social support in marriage. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 307–324. doi 10.1080/01926180126500
(2003). Observing gay, lesbian and heterosexual couples’ relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65–91. doi 10.1300/J082v45n01_04
(1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. doi 10.2307/352430
(2003). Conflict, social support, and relationship quality: An observational study of heterosexual, gay male, and lesbian couples’ communication. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 419–428. doi 10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.419
(1997). Partnerinnenschaftszufriedenheit, Belastung und Belastungsbewältigung bei lesbischen Paaren [
Relationship satisfaction, stress and coping in lesbian couples ] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universität Fribourg, Switzerland.(1988). Perceived social support in gays and lesbians in cohabitating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 504–509.
(1994). Areas of conflict for gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples: What couples argue about influences relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 923–934. doi 10.2307/353603
(2001). Differences between heterosexual-nonparent couples and gay, lesbian, and heterosexual-parent couples. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 727–754. doi 10.1177/019251301022006004
(2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251–254. doi 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00375.x
(2006). The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles, 55, 73–82. doi 10.1007/s11199-006-9061-8
(2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79–90. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.79
(1997). Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital Interaction. Personal Relationships, 4, 361–378. doi 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00151.x
(2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405–424. doi 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085701
(2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 69, 576–593. doi 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x
(2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
(2010). Psychological distress, well-being, and legal recognition in same-sex couple relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 82–86. doi 10.1037/A0017942
(2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology & Behavior, 79, 409–416. doi 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00160-4
(2008). Adult romantic relationships as contexts of human development: A multimethod comparison of same-sex couples with opposite-sex dating, engaged, and married dyads. Developmental Psychology, 44, 91–101. doi 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.91
(1993). Die deutsche Form der Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der Zufriedenheit in einer Partnerschaft. Diagnostica, 39, 55–62.
