Abstract
The present study investigated the relationship between explicit and implicit measures of affiliation, power, and achievement motives and behavior as related to social networking sites (SNS) in a sample of 59 participants. SNS appear to be designed to enable social connection via the Internet, so the potential for influence of the affiliation motive seemed self-evident. Additionally, we hypothesized that the power motive drives certain aspects of SNS behavior such that individuals with a high power motive have a larger number of friends and upload more pictures. The results of regression analyses showed that the explicit affiliation motive and the explicit power motive were related to different outcomes of SNS activity. Specifically, the explicit power motive predicted number of friends and number of uploaded pictures, whereas time spent on SNS per day was predicted by the explicit affiliation motive. Only weak evidence was found for an influence of implicit motives on SNS activity.
References
2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289–1295. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
(1998). Joint factor analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 243–250. doi 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2214
(2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372–374. doi 10.1177/0956797609360756
(2011). The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2243–2248. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.003
(1989). Motives and values to achieve: Different constructs with different effects. Journal of Personality, 57, 69–95. doi 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00761.x
(2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1303–1314. doi 10.1177/0146167208320061
(2007). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12. Retrieved May 13, 2012 from firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2026/1897
(2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1909–1912). New York: ACM.
(1987). A study of narcissism, affiliation, intimacy, and power motives among students in business administration. Psychological Reports, 61, 355–358.
(2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 341–345. doi 10.1089/cpb.2008.0226
(2012). Why people share information in social network sites? Integrating with uses and gratification and social identity theories. In , ACIIDS 2012, Part II, LNAI 7197 (pp. 175–184). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
(1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.
(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi 10.1111/j.1083-6101. 2007.00367.x
(2013). Newsroom: Key facts: Statistics. Retrieved from newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts
. (2008). Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and Internet self-efficacy as predictors of the 2iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8, 5–15. doi 10.1080/ 15252019.2008.10722138
(2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 211–220). New York: ACM.
(2011). Manifestations of personality in online social networks: Self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 483–488. doi 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087
(2013). Face to (Face)book: The two faces of social behavior? Journal of Personality, 81, 290–301. doi 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00804.x
(1974). Manual for the Personality Research Form. Goshen, NY: Research Psychology Press.
(2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027–1036). New York: ACM.
(1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164–181.
(2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 359–364. doi 10.1089/cyber.2010.0374
(2010). An Analysis of self-construalsmotivations, Facebook use, and user satisfaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 1077–1099. doi 10.1080/10447318.2010.516726
(1991). Task-intrinsic and social-extrinsic sources of arousal for motives assessed in fantasy and self-report. Journal of Personality, 59, 57–82. doi 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00768.x
(2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 721–730). New York: ACM.
(2006). The Thematic Apperception Test: Toward a standard measure of the big three motives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 277–291. doi 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_09
(2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1152–1161. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009.
(2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 141–155. doi 10.1080/17439880902923606
(1983). Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 851–861. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.851
(1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.
(1985a). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812–825. doi 10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812
(1985b). Human motivation. Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman and Co.
(1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690
(1972). Motivational workshops. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
(2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 357–364. doi 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257
(1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2011). Narcissism, extraversion and adolescents’ self-presentation on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 180–185. doi 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.022
(2005). Assessing implicit motives in U. S. college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280–294. doi 10.1207/ s15327752jpa8503_04
(2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications, and social capital on Facebook. In , Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 212–230). New York: Routledge.
(2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1974–1983. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004
(2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 169–174. doi 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056
(2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024
(2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163–182. doi 10.1023/A:1005152515264
(2008). Deutsches Kalibrierungsset für Winters (1994) “Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text” [
(German calibration set for Winter’s (1994) “Manual for scoring imagery in running text” ]. University of Nürnberg-Erlangen, Germany.2001). Assessment of implicit motives with a research version of the TAT: Picture profiles, gender differences, and relations to other personality measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 71–86. doi 10.1207/S15327752JPA7701_05
(2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24. doi 10.1007/s11031-006-9042-9
(2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 6–75. doi 10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67
(2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 766–775. doi 10.1037/2160-4134.1.S.2
(2008). The implicit motives of terrorist groups: How the needs for affiliation and power translate into death and destruction. Political Psychology, 29, 55–75. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00612.x
(1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In , Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–36). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322–2329. doi 10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
(1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.140
(1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF) [
(German Personality Research Form (PRF) ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531–549. doi 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x
(2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratification theory. Human Communication, 12, 215–229.
(2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901. doi 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
(2009). On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 573–576. doi 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009
(2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220. doi 10.1177/ 1745691612442904
(1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text ( Version 4.2). University of Michigan: MI.
(1999). History of modern personality theory and research. In , Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 3–27). New York: Guilford.
(1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250. doi 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.230
(1995). Most-memorable experiences: Evidence for a link between implicit and explicit motives and social cognitive processes in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1081–1091. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1081
(2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836. doi 10.1016/ j.chb.2008.02.012
(2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; Predicting FacebookTM and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1–34. doi 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008. 01429.x
(