Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-4747/a000420

Zusammenfassung. Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt die bisherigen empirischen Befunde zur Sprachgrundfrequenz (f0) in Paargesprächen vor und untersucht, wie sich die f0 nach einer experimentellen Stressinduktion im anschließenden spontanen Gespräch zwischen den Partner_innen verändert, wie die f0 mit der verbalen Stressäußerung zusammenhängt und wie sie zwischen den beiden Partner_innen kovariiert. Von 128 heterosexuellen Paaren nahm jeweils eine Person pro Paar am Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) teil. Die dem TSST vorangehende und anschließende naturalistische Interaktion zwischen den Partner_innen wurde gefilmt und nach Gesprächsthema und Art der Stressäußerung kodiert. Wie vorherige Studien zur f0 im Paargespräch zeigte auch die vorliegende Studie, dass die f0 wichtige Informationen über die Partnerschaft enthält. Während eine Erhöhung der f0 in Gesprächen über einen paarinternen Stressor (d.h. bei Konfliktgesprächen) mit negativen Kommunikationsmustern einherging, zeigte die vorliegende Studie, dass die f0 bei Gesprächen über einen paarexternen Stressor (d.h. beim TSST) mit emotionsorientierten Stressäußerungen einherging, also einer für den Stressbewältigungsprozess förderlichen Art der Kommunikation. Die Oszillatorenmodelle zeigen darüber hinaus, dass eine Kopplung der f0 zwischen den Partner_innen besteht, was darauf hindeutet, dass die nicht gestressten Partner_innen auf die paraverbalen Stressäußerungen der gestressten Partner_innen mit ihren eigenen paraverbalen Stressäußerungen reagieren.


Measuring fundamental frequency in couples' conversations – Opportunities for assessment and intervention in couple therapy

Abstract. This paper reviews the empirical research on the fundamental frequency of speech f0 in romantic couples' interactions. It examines how f0 changes during spontaneous conversation between the romantic partners after one partner has participated in an experimental stress induction, how f0 relates to verbal stress expressions, and how it is covaries between the two partners. Out of 128 heterosexual couples, one person per couple took the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). The naturalistic interaction between the partners before and after the TSST was videotaped with a hidden camera and the topic of conversation and the type of stress expression were coded. Like previous studies on f0 in couple's conversation, the present study showed that f0 contains important information about the couple’s relationship. While in previous studies an increase in f0 during conflict conversations was associated with negative communication patterns, the present study shows that an increase in f0 during conversations about a couple-external stressor (i.e., the TSST) was associated with emotion-oriented stress expressions, a type of communication that is beneficial for the stress-management process. The oscillator models also show that there is a coupling of f0 between the partners, indicating that the nonstressed partners react to the paraverbal stress expressions of the stressed partners with their own paraverbal stress expressions.

Literatur

  • Allen, A. P. , Kennedy, P. J. , Dockray, S. , Cryan, J. F. , Dinan, T.G. & Clarke, G. (2017). The Trier Social Stress Test: Principles and practice. Neurobiology of Stress , 6 , 113–126. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baucom, B. R. (2010). Power and arousal: New methods for assessing couples. In K. Hahlweg M. Grawe-Gerber D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples: The shape of couple therapy to come (pp.171–184). Ashland: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baucom, B. R. , Atkins, D. C. , Eldridge, K. , McFarland, P. , Sevier, M. & Christensen, A. (2011). The language of demand/withdraw: Verbal and vocal expression in dyadic interactions. Journal of Family Psychology , 25 , 570–580. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baucom, B. R. , Atkins, D. C. , Simpson, L. E. & Christensen, A. (2009). Prediction of response to treatment in a randomized clinical trial of couple therapy: A 2-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 77 , 160–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baucom, B. R. , Sheng, E. , Christensen, A. , Georgiou, P. G. , Narayanan, S. S. & Atkins, D. C. (2015). Behaviorally-based couple therapies reduce emotional arousal during couple conflict. Behaviour Research and Therapy , 72 , 49–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baucom, B. R. , Weusthoff, S. , Atkins, D. C. & Hahlweg, K. (2012). Greater emotional arousal predicts poorer long-term memory of communication skills in couples. Behaviour Research and Therapy , 50 , 442–447. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ben-David, B. M. , Multani, N. , Shakuf, V. , Rudzicz, F. & van Lieshout, P. H. (2016). Prosody and semantics are separate but not separable channels in the perception of emotional speech: Test for rating of emotions in speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 59 , 72–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berscheid, E. & Ammazzalorso, H. (2007). Emotional experience in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp.308–330). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1995). Bewältigung von Stress in Partnerschaften. Der Einfluss von Belastungen auf die Qualität und Stabilität von Paarbeziehungen . Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. A. Revenson K. Kayser G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Computer program). Version 6.1.09. Verfügbar unter http://www.praat.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boker, S. M. & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 37 , 127–160. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, E. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The „TIES“ that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc , 15 , 367–393. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, E. A. & Barnard, K. J. (2019). Quantifying interpersonal dynamics for studying socio-emotional processes and adverse health behaviors. Psychosomatic Medicine , 81 , 749–758. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cramer, D. (2003). Facilitativeness, conflict, demand for approval, self-esteem, and satisfaction with romantic relationships. Journal of Psychology , 137 , 85–98. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eldridge, K. A. , Sevier, M. , Jones, J. , Atkins, D. C. & Christensen, A. (2007). Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: Rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. Journal of Family Psychology , 21 , 218–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, M. S. , Baucom, D. H. , Baucom, B. R. , Abramowitz, J. S. , Kirby, J. S. & Bulik, C. M. (2017). Disorder-specific patterns of emotion coregulation in couples: Comparing obsessive compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa. Journal of Family Psychology , 31 , 304–315. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, M. S. , Baucom, B. R. , Baucom, D. H. , Sheng, E. , Atkins, D. C. & Hahlweg, K. (2019). When the „U“ is not inverted: Trajectories of expressed emotional arousal predict relationship satisfaction. Family Process , 58 , 463–477. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, M. S. , Baucom, D. H. , Baucom, B. R. , Weusthoff, S. , Hahlweg, K. , Atkins, D. C. et al. (2015). Emotional arousal predicts observed social support in German and American couples talking about breast cancer. Journal of Family Psychology , 29 , 744–754. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giddens, C. L. , Barron, K. W. , Byrd-Craven, J. , Clark, K. F. & Winter, A. S. (2013). Vocal indices of stress: A review. Journal of Voice , 27 , 390.e21–390.e29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 50 , 93–98. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Imel, Z. E. , Barco, J. S. , Brown, H. J. , Baucom, B. R. , Baer, J. S. , Kircher, J. C. et al. (2014). The association of therapist empathy and synchrony in vocally encoded arousal. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 61 , 146–153. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Juslin, P. N. & Scherer, K. R. (2005). Vocal expression of affect. In J. A. Harrigan K. R. Scherer R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Series in affective science. The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp.65–135). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kirschbaum, C. , Pirke, K. M. & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’–a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology , 28 , 76–81. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kliem, S. , Weusthoff, S. , Hahlweg, K. , Baucom, K. J. W. & Baucom, B. R. (2015). Predicting long-term risk for relationship dissolution using nonparametric conditional survival trees. Journal of Family Psychology , 29 , 807–817. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhn, R. , Milek, A. , Meuwly, N. , Bradbury, T. N. & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Zooming in: A microanalysis of couples’ dyadic coping conversations after experimentally induced stress. Journal of Family Psychology , 31 , 1063–1073. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laukka, P. , Juslin, P. N. & Bresin, R. (2005). A dimensional approach to vocal expression of emotion. Cognition and Emotion , 19 , 633–653. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levenson, R. W. & Gottman, J. M. (1992). Empathy: A Physiological Substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 63 , 334–346. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levenson, R. W. & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meuwly, N. , Bodenmann, G. , Germann, J. , Bradbury, T. N. , Ditzen, B. & Heinrichs, M. (2012). Dyadic coping, insecure attachment, and cortisol stress recovery following experimentally induced stress. Journal of Family Psychology , 26 , 937–947. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, L. , Franke, L. , Tkachenko, D. , Schiffer, M. & Zimmermann, T. (2018). Einfluss von Emotionsregulation und emotionaler Erregung auf Lebensqualität und Adhärenz bei Paaren nach Nierentransplantation. PPmP – Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie , 68 , 202–211. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pisanski, K. , Kobylarek, A. , Jakubowska, L. , Nowak, J. , Walter, A. , Błaszczyński, K. et al. (2018). Multimodal stress detection: Testing for covariation in vocal, hormonal and physiological responses to Trier Social Stress Test. Hormones and Behavior , 106 , 52–61. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preston, S. D. & Waal, F. B. M. de (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 25 , 1–20. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Randall, A. K. & Schoebi, D. (2018). Conceptual approaches to studying interpersonal emotion dynamics (Studies in emotion and social interaction – Second series). Interpersonal emotion dynamics in close relationships (pp.7–26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin , 99 , 143–165. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sondhi, S. , Khan, M. , Vijay, R. , Salhan, A. K. & Chouhan, S. (2015). Acoustic analysis of speech under stress. International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications , 11 , 417–432. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stalinski, S. M. , Schellenberg, E. G. & Trehub, S. E. (2008). Developmental changes in the perception of pitch contour: Distinguishing up from down. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 124 , 1759–1763. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, D. M. , Fischer, M. S. , Baucom, D. H. , Baucom, B. R. , Kirby, J. S. , Runfola, C. D. et al. (2019). The association between symptom accommodation and emotional coregulation in couples with binge eating disorder. Family Process , 58 , 920–935. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weusthoff, S. , Baucom, B. R. & Hahlweg, K. (2013). Fundamental frequency during couple conflict: An analysis of physiological, behavioral, and sex-linked in-formation encoded in vocal expression. Journal of Family Psychology , 27 , 212–220. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, T. , Krüger, J. H. & Weusthoff, S. (2017). Stimmlich enkodierte emotionale Erregung (Voice Stress) und Posttraumatische Reifung sowie Partnerschaftszufriedenheit bei Partnern von Brustkrebspatientinnen im Kontext der sozialen Unterstützung. PPmP – Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie , 67 , 288–295. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar